On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 08:03 -0700, scm in seattle wrote:
Surely you can, in some manner... as I replied much earlier, I had by
mistake enabled the Rawhide development repository.
The scary thing is that the normal/typical update manager found these
packages and proceeded to 'upgrade' my
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:09 +, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Andrew Kelly akelly at corisweb.org writes:
Even Sidux won't yet touch KDE4, and that's right out there on the scary
edge and KDE-centric to boot. One must learn to read the omens.
Sidux is based on Debian unstable (sid).
Hence the
Todd Zullinger wrote:
scm in seattle wrote:
I have been using F8 for a while now and simply put it was the only
distro that supported my laptop (fairly) well.
Today I accepted what appeared to be 'typical' updates. The size of
the update concerned me slightly (500Mb) but turned to horror when
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:09 +, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If you want old stuff, use Fedora 8, not 9.
Has 8 got proper working sound yet? And without having to rip out
pulseaudio to achieve it?
I'm still using 7 on these boxes, because what I've read on this tends
to suggest that it doesn't. 9
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 21:12 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:09 +, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If you want old stuff, use Fedora 8, not 9.
Has 8 got proper working sound yet? And without having to rip out
pulseaudio to achieve it?
FWIW, I'm running F9 (w/ pulseaudio) and everything
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:59:48 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
scm in seattle wrote:
I have been using F8 for a while now and simply put it was the only distro
that supported my laptop (fairly) well.
Today I accepted what appeared to be 'typical' updates. The size of the
update concerned
Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:09 +, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If you want old stuff, use Fedora 8, not 9.
Has 8 got proper working sound yet? And without having to rip out
pulseaudio to achieve it?
I'm still using 7 on these boxes, because what I've read on this tends
to suggest that it
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 21:12 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:09 +, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If you want old stuff, use Fedora 8, not 9.
Has 8 got proper working sound yet? And without having to rip out
pulseaudio to
for me to accept.
Surely you cannot upgrade to Fedora-9 by mistake?
If in fact you have not upgraded to Fedora-9
why call your posting F8-F9 horror.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2
Sam,
My script is simpler - insert DVD, restart, follow the prompts
So much changed that it would be and exercise in futility to try undo the mess.
But thanks for the inspiration!
Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, this is an excellent opportunity for you to learn how to recover a
2008/5/30 scm in seattle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Surely you can, in some manner... as I replied much earlier, I had by
mistake enabled the Rawhide development repository.
The scary thing is that the normal/typical update manager found these
packages and proceeded to 'upgrade' my system. In effect
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
2008/5/30 scm in seattle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Surely you can, in some manner... as I replied much earlier, I had by
mistake enabled the Rawhide development repository.
yum can only do what you asked/told it to do. If you enable the rawhide
or testing repos and there's
Le Vendredi, 30 Mai 2008 10:09:22 + (UTC),
Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
If you want old stuff, use Fedora 8, not 9.
Anytime. I like old stuff that recognizes network printers right off
the install. Bravo F8.
I hate new stuff that not only does not recognize printers after
the
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 21:31 -0400, lanas wrote:
And please, keep your new stuff to play with. When it reaches a state
that can be acceptable, then let it out.
Not before.
You do realize that the way it gets to be acceptable is by people
using it? You do realize that that is precisely what
I have been using F8 for a while now and simply put it was the only distro that
supported my laptop (fairly) well.
Today I accepted what appeared to be 'typical' updates. The size of the update
concerned me slightly (500Mb) but turned to horror when it finished and I
rebooted.
My useful KDE3
scm in seattle wrote:
I have been using F8 for a while now and simply put it was the only distro
that supported my laptop (fairly) well.
Today I accepted what appeared to be 'typical' updates. The size of the
update concerned me slightly (500Mb) but turned to horror when it finished
and I
scm in seattle wrote:
I have been using F8 for a while now and simply put it was the only distro
that supported my laptop (fairly) well.
Today I accepted what appeared to be 'typical' updates. The size of the
update concerned me slightly (500Mb) but turned to horror when it finished
and I
scm in seattle wrote:
I have been using F8 for a while now and simply put it was the only
distro that supported my laptop (fairly) well.
Today I accepted what appeared to be 'typical' updates. The size of
the update concerned me slightly (500Mb) but turned to horror when
it finished and I
Hi Rex,
yum repolist shows: Fedora - Rawhide...
My own doing surely while looking for some other package I required. I guess
it's time to rebuild the installation, unless you have any other suggestions on
how to recover this mess. Thanks for your help.
Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: scm
2008/5/29 scm in seattle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No I did not read the release notes because... I was NOT intending to
upgrade to F9! I did accept the updates that the update notifier prompted
for me to accept.
Fedora may have bugs, but it doesn't auto update to a different version.
Perhaps I
scm in seattle writes:
Hi Rex,
yum repolist shows: Fedora - Rawhide...
My own doing surely while looking for some other package I required. I
guess it's time to rebuild the installation, unless you have any other
suggestions on how to recover this mess. Thanks for your help.
Well, it
scm in seattle scmsea at yahoo.com writes:
yum repolist shows: Fedora - Rawhide...
Then that must be it. Note that Rawhide is actually F10 pre-alpha, not F9, so
no wonder it's buggy (but it has KDE 4.1 beta 1, so your complaints about 4.0
are missing the point).
Kevin Kofler
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
