On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:12:43 -0500, Dave wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 09:17:28PM +1030, Tim wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 05:21 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > > I am again in a continuously repeating cycle of failing updates.
> > > How do I kill the update process?
> >
> > You should say w
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 09:17:28PM +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 05:21 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > I am again in a continuously repeating cycle of failing updates.
> > How do I kill the update process?
>
> You should say what you're using (YUM, package kit, command line,
> GUI...).
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 05:21 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> I am again in a continuously repeating cycle of failing updates.
> How do I kill the update process?
You should say what you're using (YUM, package kit, command line,
GUI...).
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686
Don't send
I am again in a continuously repeating cycle of failing updates.
How do I kill the update process?
Thanks.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuide
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 05:35:16PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:30:21PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Dave Feustel wrote:
> >>
> >> > fc9 update is failing because of a missing dependency.
> >> > the missing dependency, according to yum, is kdepi
Dave Feustel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:30:21PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Dave Feustel wrote:
>>
>> > fc9 update is failing because of a missing dependency.
>> > the missing dependency, according to yum, is kdepim 6:3.5.9-10.fc9.
>>
>> What does yum say *exactly*?
>>
>> -- Rex
>
> I
Try to remove it , then after updating your system reinstall it.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 23:14, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fc9 update is failing because of a missing dependency.
>
> the missing dependency, according to yum, is kdepim 6:3.5.9-10.fc9.
>
> This for 32-bit fedora, the
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:30:21PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Dave Feustel wrote:
>>
>> > fc9 update is failing because of a missing dependency.
>> > the missing dependency, according to yum, is kdepim 6:3.5.9-10.fc9.
>>
>>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:30:21PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > fc9 update is failing because of a missing dependency.
> > the missing dependency, according to yum, is kdepim 6:3.5.9-10.fc9.
>
> What does yum say *exactly*?
>
> -- Rex
I remember using yum to get kde 4.1
Dave Feustel wrote:
> fc9 update is failing because of a missing dependency.
> the missing dependency, according to yum, is kdepim 6:3.5.9-10.fc9.
What does yum say *exactly*?
-- Rex
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fed
fc9 update is failing because of a missing dependency.
the missing dependency, according to yum, is kdepim 6:3.5.9-10.fc9.
This for 32-bit fedora, the last successful update for which on my
system was on 9/18/2008.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.r
Rahul Sundaram fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Since Fedora has changed its key now, new pushes requires packages to be
> (re)signed with the new key. Release engineering is still working out
> the details with Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
IMHO it would be much safer to push them out wit
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:08:30 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since Fedora has changed its key now, new pushes requires packages to be
> (re)signed with the new key. Release engineering is still working out
> the details with Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
Tha
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:46:35 -0700,
"Daniel B. Thurman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has there been any updates as of 1 week or so. Seems that
I am not getting any updates since the announcement.
Pending updates are flowing again. They seem to be stuck in pending ri
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:46:35 -0700,
"Daniel B. Thurman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has there been any updates as of 1 week or so. Seems that
> I am not getting any updates since the announcement.
Pending updates are flowing again. They seem to be stuck in pending right now.
So you do ha
Has there been any updates as of 1 week or so. Seems that
I am not getting any updates since the announcement.
Do I need to do anything if there were updates?
Thanks!
Dan
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:07:45AM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 08:59 -0400, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > My fedora 9 system has not updated since Aug 1, although I have refreshed
> > several times. Is there a way to confirm that my system is up-to-date?
> >
> > Also, I am
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 08:48:05AM -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 08:59 -0400, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > My fedora 9 system has not updated since Aug 1, although I have refreshed
> > several times. Is there a way to confirm that my system is up-to-date?
> >
> > Also, I am having
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 08:59 -0400, Dave Feustel wrote:
> My fedora 9 system has not updated since Aug 1, although I have refreshed
> several times. Is there a way to confirm that my system is up-to-date?
>
> Also, I am having a lot of problems with Konqueror. Are 4.1 kde updates
> out yet?
Not on
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 08:59 -0400, Dave Feustel wrote:
> My fedora 9 system has not updated since Aug 1, although I have refreshed
> several times. Is there a way to confirm that my system is up-to-date?
>
> Also, I am having a lot of problems with Konqueror. Are 4.1 kde updates
> out yet?
>
> Th
My fedora 9 system has not updated since Aug 1, although I have refreshed
several times. Is there a way to confirm that my system is up-to-date?
Also, I am having a lot of problems with Konqueror. Are 4.1 kde updates
out yet?
Thanks.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubsc
2008/7/29 Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 07:54 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
>> Is there a place we can find all the groups that Fedoras rpm has?
>
> Do you mean "yum grouplist"?
>
> If so, you might also want to try: yum grouplist
How lazy of me. :-(
Thanks.
--
Martín Marqué
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 07:54 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> Is there a place we can find all the groups that Fedoras rpm has?
Do you mean "yum grouplist"?
If so, you might also want to try: yum grouplist
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my
2008/7/25 Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Craig White wrote:
>> how can I enable fedora-testing and get these AND ONLY these packages?
>
> Perhaps something like this would work?
>
> yum --enablerepo updates-testing groupupdate 'KDE (K Desktop Environment)'
Is there a place we can find all t
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks...apparently there is some clean up still required on kdebindings...
> I'll have to double-check the qscintilla/kdebindings thing.
confirmed. we'll sort that out.
-- Rex
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Craig White wrote:
> Thanks...apparently there is some clean up still required on kdebindings
> and kdegraphics but that does allow it to get installed except,
> developers should note the following on kdegraphics...
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/kdc
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 17:21 +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 26 July 2008 16:50:46 Craig White wrote:
> >
> > problem...
> >
> > # yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install kdesdk kdebase kdepimlibs sip
> > qscintilla qgtkstyle kdeedu kdebindings soprano kdeplasma-addons
> > kdegames kdea
On Saturday 26 July 2008 16:50:46 Craig White wrote:
>
> problem...
>
> # yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install kdesdk kdebase kdepimlibs sip
> qscintilla qgtkstyle kdeedu kdebindings soprano kdeplasma-addons
> kdegames kdeaccessibility compiz kdenetwork kdegraphics kdeadmin
> kdebase-runti
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 22:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:20 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
> >> repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
> >> filter
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 13:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > Well, naturally it's up to me, but I was hoping for some insight into
> > the relationship between the various repos.
>
> kde-redhat is a personal repo of mine. essentially the "rawhide of kde",
> where I so
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:30 +, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan gmail.com> writes:
> > Well, naturally it's up to me, but I was hoping for some insight into
> > the relationship between the various repos. I started using kde-redhat a
> > few weeks back in order to get a preview of KDE
On Friday 25 July 2008 03:20:41 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Just to give a word of warning (and spread hype. :) )
>
> A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
> repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
> filter last-minute bugs. Please help t
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 19:27 -0300, Germán Racca wrote:
> I'm using KDE 4.0.5.
> How can I install KDE 4.0.99 in a separate place in F9?
> I mean, I don't want to override or upgrade KDE 4.0.5, I just whant to
> have the option to choose between KDE 4.0.5, KDE 4.0.99, GNOME, etc...
> Thanks,
yo
I'm using KDE 4.0.5.
How can I install KDE 4.0.99 in a separate place in F9?
I mean, I don't want to override or upgrade KDE 4.0.5, I just whant to
have the option to choose between KDE 4.0.5, KDE 4.0.99, GNOME, etc...
Thanks,
German.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Well, naturally it's up to me, but I was hoping for some insight into
> the relationship between the various repos.
kde-redhat is a personal repo of mine. essentially the "rawhide of kde", where
I sometimes put the latest kde bits built for fedora releases (like F-9
Joonas Sarajärvi gmail.com> writes:
> Wouldn't these [libraries] be upgraded due to dependencies?
Only where the dependencies are versioned.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Patrick O'Callaghan gmail.com> writes:
> Well, naturally it's up to me, but I was hoping for some insight into
> the relationship between the various repos. I started using kde-redhat a
> few weeks back in order to get a preview of KDE 4.1, and it has gone
> pretty well all in all. What I'd like t
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 22:19 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:20 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
> >> repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
> >>
2008/7/25 Kevin Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Todd Zullinger pobox.com> writes:
>> Perhaps something like this would work?
>>
>> yum --enablerepo updates-testing groupupdate 'KDE (K Desktop Environment)'
>
> Most likely not. The comps groups don't include libraries, and those should be
> upgraded
Todd Zullinger pobox.com> writes:
> Perhaps something like this would work?
>
> yum --enablerepo updates-testing groupupdate 'KDE (K Desktop Environment)'
Most likely not. The comps groups don't include libraries, and those should be
upgraded too.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 23:36 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > how can I enable fedora-testing and get these AND ONLY these packages?
>
> Perhaps something like this would work?
>
> yum --enablerepo updates-testing groupupdate 'KDE (K Desktop Environment)'
>
> That wouldn't be
Craig White wrote:
> how can I enable fedora-testing and get these AND ONLY these packages?
Perhaps something like this would work?
yum --enablerepo updates-testing groupupdate 'KDE (K Desktop Environment)'
That wouldn't be quite as limited as the command you had, but it's
sure a lot less to typ
Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:20 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
>> repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
>> filter last-minute bugs. Please help test and offer feedback
>> http:
Craig White wrote:
> I presume
> because you said these packages are 'queued' and not in the repositories
> yet)...
yes. . I wanted to make sure folks had a chance to see an announcement
*before* stuff happened.
-- Rex
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:20 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
>> repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
>> filter last-minute bugs. Please help test and offer feedback.
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:20 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Just to give a word of warning (and spread hype. :) )
>
> A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
> repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
> filter last-minute bugs. Please he
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 21:20 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Just to give a word of warning (and spread hype. :) )
>
> A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
> repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
> filter last-minute bugs. Please he
Just to give a word of warning (and spread hype. :) )
A kde-4.1-rc2 update is queued for release to fedora 9's updates-testing
repository. It is meant for testing the upcoming KDE 4.1 release and to
filter last-minute bugs. Please help test and offer feedback.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
48 matches
Mail list logo
