Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
No, I don't understandably say it's too bleeding edge. I didn't say
that at all. But, I don't mind testing packages.
Fine. So packages in rawhide should be moved continuously into updates
as each is found worthy of general use? But how? If by the time
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
As I understand it, Gentoo doesn't suffer this because each user is
compiling their own package sets. Updating libfoo doesn't require
recursively redownloading every package that requires it because the
user already has the
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
No, I don't understandably say it's too bleeding edge. I didn't say
that at all. But, I don't mind testing packages.
Fine. So packages in rawhide should be moved continuously into updates
as each is found worthy of general use? But
Original Message
Subject: Re: Feature Proposal: Rolling Updates (was Re: WHY I WANT TO
STOP USING FEDORA!!!)
From: Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 02/11/2009 10:04 AM
I'd
Alan Evans wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
As I understand it, Gentoo doesn't suffer this because each user is
compiling their own package sets. Updating libfoo doesn't require
recursively redownloading every package that requires it because the
Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
But what about appbar that also requires libfoo? Unless I'm
misunderstanding how Gentoo works (which is possible), you don't need
to redownload appbar because libfoo was updated. You only need to
recompile appbar after updating libfoo.
Not exactly. If
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
Normally, you only need to recompile if there is a major version in
the library. If it is a minor version change, it is supposed to be
backward compatible.
This maybe expected for libraries which advertises a
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
This maybe expected for libraries which advertises a stable API, but
its not a hard and fast rule for all libraries..especially for
libraries which do not advertise themselves as stable.
Mark Haney wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
No, I don't understandably say it's too bleeding edge. I didn't say
that at all. But, I don't mind testing packages.
Fine. So packages in rawhide should be moved continuously into updates
as each is found worthy of
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Mark Haney wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Mark Haney wrote:
Alan Evans wrote:
No, I don't understandably say it's too bleeding edge. I didn't say
that at all. But, I don't mind testing packages.
Fine. So packages in rawhide should be moved continuously into updates
as
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
It sounds like your example is the exception to the rule.
I'm pretty sure we went through the same sort of thing early on in the
d-bus process in previous Fedora releases before D-bus announced API
stability.
Original Message
Subject: Re: WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!
From: Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 02/10/2009 03:21 PM
Now, I'm done with this thread.
OK, great.
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!
From: Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 02/10/2009 03:21 PM
Now, I'm done with
Original Message
Subject: Re: Feature Proposal: Rolling Updates (was Re: WHY I WANT TO
STOP USING FEDORA!!!)
From: Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 02/10/2009 04:10 PM
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Original Message
You didn't get what I said. I realize that Gentoo provides all the same
latest and greatest stuff Fedora does, however, they mask most of the
bleeding-edge stuff that Fedora has already.
No, I understood. But what is masked
Mark Haney wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!
From: Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 02/10/2009 03:21 PM
Now,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!
From: Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
That won't work and will purely be annoying. If you want rolling
releases, setup a SIG to do so. These guys have work to do. They don't
seem to have free time that can be shifted to whatever you want, just
because you want it. That's the whole point of having a community
18 matches
Mail list logo
