I reinstalled Fedora 9 on a HP NetServer 2000 that had been previously
running Fedora 4.
Rebooting the machine following the install gives the following errors:
Booting the kernel
APCI: Resource is not an IRQ entry
pnp: PnPACPI: METHOD_NAME__CRD failure for PNP0400
i2o: iop0 could not
i2o: iop0 could not activate controller
(it stalls here...)
As I recall when I originally installed FC4 it needed the megaraid_mbox
driver. I sure it's not loading the right i2o driver either.
Thats an ancient AMI Megaraid by the sound of it.
Go into the megaraid bios settings and turn
Seann Clark wrote:
under linux, with the HP370 driver loaded into the kernel, it will work
as a RAID that isn't managed or taxing the CPU. The HP controller will
take care of all mirroring and striping aspects leaving the CPU free to
do whatever else.
Sorry, but I’m pretty sure this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID
see the section on Firmware / Driver based RAID
t4l.
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
by the way, there are no additional connectors for RAID as hard drive
connections are entirely standardized and you use one of the known
standards like IDE/PATA, SATA, SCSI-LVD, SCSI-SCA and probably some
others.
not true.
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 06:34 +, g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
by the way, there are no additional connectors for RAID as hard drive
connections are entirely standardized and you use one of the known
standards like IDE/PATA, SATA,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
OK - understand, motherboard with fake raid connectors for fake raid.
not fake. see;
http://www.motherboard.cz/mb/abit/kt7-raid.htm
for view of board.
[no longer shown on abit site]
[note: do not get sidetracked and lost
g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
OK - understand, motherboard with fake raid connectors for fake raid.
not fake. see;
http://www.motherboard.cz/mb/abit/kt7-raid.htm
for view of board.
[no longer shown on abit site]
[note: do not get
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:26 -0500, Seann Clark wrote:
g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
OK - understand, motherboard with fake raid connectors for fake raid.
not fake. see;
http://www.motherboard.cz/mb/abit/kt7-raid.htm
for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seann Clark wrote:
I have to define, kt7-RAID, which I own a board with that on it, is
i bow to your knowledge as an owner.
raid was not a feature that caused me to buy board, but did help. i need a
faster board and wanted amd. cpu and board were
g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seann Clark wrote:
I have to define, kt7-RAID, which I own a board with that on it, is
i bow to your knowledge as an owner.
raid was not a feature that caused me to buy board, but did help. i need a
faster board and wanted amd.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 20:01:47 +,
g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if ide1,2 are non raid, can ide3,4 be used as true raid under linux after
linux install?
There are significant advantages to just using software raid until Linux
and not using the on board raid. (In particular you won't need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
translation...high point is fake raid though I don't want to denigrate
high point stuff or their attempts to support Linux.
from seann's later response, fake if all 8 drives are raid. not fake
if ide1,2 = non raid and ide3,4 =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
There are significant advantages to just using software raid until Linux
and not using the on board raid.
this i understand, and have done. just not of late as needed drives for
separate systems. did cause a lot of extra
translation...high point is fake raid though I don't want to denigrate
high point stuff or their attempts to support Linux.
To be honest the software RAID interfaces are usually better than
hardware ones especially once you reach the world of PCI express where
each controller has its own
I've got an ASUS M3N78-EMH HDMI motherboard with 2 Gb RAM AMD 5600 X2
proc.
There are (2) Seagate ST350032NS (500 GB SATA drives) configure in the
BIOS for a RAID1. The OS is RedHat Fedora 9.
Following successful installation, it fails to boot. The grub boot
loader displays correctly but
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 11:39 -0700, Jack Lauman wrote:
I've got an ASUS M3N78-EMH HDMI motherboard with 2 Gb RAM AMD 5600 X2
proc.
There are (2) Seagate ST350032NS (500 GB SATA drives) configure in the
BIOS for a RAID1. The OS is RedHat Fedora 9.
Following successful installation, it
Here's the results of 'lspci -v'
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 Host Bridge
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 82f1
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0
Capabilities: [c4] HyperTransport: Slave or Primary Interface
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BIOS Raid1 ? on ASUS motherboard? sounds like fake raid and wouldn't be
supported...at least not without some tacky vendor supplied driver.
Perhaps you need to give us info on this BIOS RAID (lspci -v)
I have a SuperMicro
I tied setting up a software RAID1 during the install but I kept getting
an error saying that there was an existing partition on the second disk.
I checked with fdisk /dev/sdb and found that there were no partitions
that fdisk could see. I've never had this problem before.
Is there something
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jack Lauman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tied setting up a software RAID1 during the install but I kept getting an
error saying that there was an existing partition on the second disk.
I checked with fdisk /dev/sdb and found that there were no partitions that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
BIOS Raid1 ? on ASUS motherboard? sounds like fake raid and wouldn't be
supported...at least not without some tacky vendor supplied driver.
do not know about 'fake raid' on asus boards, but a few years back i had an
asus main
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:30 +, g wrote:
not familiar with 'fake raid', but have noted it mentioned before. any
suggestions where i might look to increase my knowledge about 'fake raid'?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID
see the section on Firmware / Driver based RAID
Craig
--
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:30 +, g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
BIOS Raid1 ? on ASUS motherboard? sounds like fake raid and wouldn't be
supported...at least not without some tacky vendor supplied driver.
do not know about 'fake raid' on
24 matches
Mail list logo
