Re: Grub and Chainloaders

suvayu ali wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Dan Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > title Fedora 9 > norootverify (hd0,4) > > ... > > title Fedora (2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686) > root (hd0,4) > > > I am very new to linux, but could

Re: Grub and Chainloaders

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Dan Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > title Fedora 9 > norootverify (hd0,4) > ... > title Fedora (2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686) > root (hd0,4) > I am very new to linux, but could this be correct? both of them (hd0,4)? -- Suvayu Open source is the future

Re: Grub and Chainloaders

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:24 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote: > Thinking that the chainloader +1 was not finding the right > partition, I assumed that +1 means to locate the next partition, No, it's to do with how it reads *that* partition. 13.3.4 chainloader -- -- Command: chainloader

Re: Grub and Chainloaders [SOLVED]

Daniel B. Thurman wrote: I have successfully arranged Grubs in the following way: -Primary--Primary--Primary--Extended--> [boot-sys] [boot-f8] [boot-f9] [ [root-f8] [root-f9] [f-App1] [swap] ] boot-sys: [...] #boo

Grub and Chainloaders

I have successfully arranged Grubs in the following way: -Primary--Primary--Primary--Extended--> [boot-sys] [boot-f8] [boot-f9] [ [root-f8] [root-f9] [f-App1] [swap] ] boot-sys: [...] #boot=/dev/sda timeout=10 defa