John Austin wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 13:07 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Reg Clemens wrote:
Thanks, I loaded all the modules mentioned above with yum.
BOY, the i386 modules pulled in a LOT of other 386 modules, but
I guess thats why we have big disks today...
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 13:07 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Reg Clemens wrote:
> >> Thanks, I loaded all the modules mentioned above with yum.
> >> BOY, the i386 modules pulled in a LOT of other 386 modules, but
> >> I guess thats why we have big disks today...
> >>
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Reg Clemens wrote:
Thanks, I loaded all the modules mentioned above with yum.
BOY, the i386 modules pulled in a LOT of other 386 modules, but
I guess thats why we have big disks today...
There's a 64-bit flash plugin now available. I'd suggest installing that
in
Reg Clemens wrote:
Thanks, I loaded all the modules mentioned above with yum.
BOY, the i386 modules pulled in a LOT of other 386 modules, but
I guess thats why we have big disks today...
There's a 64-bit flash plugin now available. I'd suggest installing that
instead.
--
fedora-list mai
> Reg Clemens wrote:
> >
> >>> Ive been trying on and off now for a week to try to get the Flash Player
> >>> plugin working with Netscape on f9_64.
> >>>
> >> Netscape? That old crusty, unsupported browser?
> >>
> >> Do you mean Firefox?
> >>
> > Yes I meant Firefox,- just a slip.
>
> Yes, F9 x
