On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 20:18:09 -0800,
Michael Rohan wrote:
>
> Just a minor additional suggestion: since this is for a home network, you
> probably have DNS servers supplied by your ISP. You should configure your
> named server as a forwarder rather than doing your own full resolution,
That
Michael:
>> Just a minor additional suggestion: since this is for a home network,
>> you probably have DNS servers supplied by your ISP. You should
>> configure your named server as a forwarder rather than doing your own
>> full resolution,
gms...@yahoo.com:
> After cat /etc/resolve.conf, got thi
Hi,
This is for named.conf, not resolv.conf
Take care,
Michael.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:14 PM, wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
> [
> Just a minor additional suggestion: since this is for a home network, you
> probably have DNS servers supplied by your ISP. You should configure your
> named server a
Michael wrote:[
Just a minor additional suggestion: since this is for a home network, you
probably have DNS servers supplied by your ISP. You should configure your
named server as a forwarder rather than doing your own full resolution,
e.g., add
forward only;
forwarders {
1/28/09, Seann Clark //* wrote:
>>
>>
>>From: Seann Clark
>>Subject: Re: How to set up a DNS server(at Home)
>>To: gms...@yahoo.com, "Community assistance, encouragement, and
>>advice for using Fedora."
>>Date: Wednesday, Janua
Clark
Subject: Re: How to set up a DNS server(at Home)
To: gms...@yahoo.com, "Community assistance, encouragement, and
advice for using Fedora."
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 10:35 PM
gms...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi,
> Typing this "rpm -q bind&q
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:14:58 -0600,
> "Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
>> He may also find that dnsmasq, witch is in the repository
>> (dnsmasq-2.45-1.fc10.i386) may do the job, and is much simpler to
>> set up then bind.
>
> That's a forwarder isn't it?
>
> (When I wa
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:14:58 -0600,
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> He may also find that dnsmasq, witch is in the repository
> (dnsmasq-2.45-1.fc10.i386) may do the job, and is much simpler to
> set up then bind.
That's a forwarder isn't it?
(When I was listing DNS server types I forgot to
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> For a general overview of DNS, DJB's pages (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html)
> are probably a better start. Though he should note that neither tinydns
> nor dnscache are in Fedora, so he probably isn't going to want to use
> because of the extra work involved.
>
> You respo
> Can anyone explain the file contents in detail and about named.ca?
> And what I have to do in step by step to set up a dns server ?
http://magazine.redhat.com/2006/11/16/how-to-set-up-a-home-dns-server/
http://magazine.redhat.com/2006/12/15/dns/
Those are some slightly old redhat magazine artic
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:35:30 -0600,
Seann Clark wrote:
> I hate to plug books, but this may be the easiest way to get an good
> explanation to a home user of the components on a DNS server. Check out
> http://my.safaribooksonline.com/0596100574 Which is the DNS BIND book,
> which is a
gms...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Typing this "rpm -q bind" got this:
bind-9.5.1-0.8.b2.fc10.i386
In "named.conf file" I got this:
//
// named.conf
//
// Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS
// server as a caching only nameserver (as a localhost DNS resolver only).
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 08:06 -0800, gms...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Can anyone explain the file contents in detail and about named.ca?
> And what I have to do in step by step to set up a dns server ?
>
you might find this useful
http://www.brennan.id.au/
Craig
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedo
Hi,
Typing this "rpm -q bind" got this:
bind-9.5.1-0.8.b2.fc10.i386
In "named.conf file" I got this:
//
// named.conf
//
// Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS
// server as a caching only nameserver (as a localhost DNS resolver only).
//
// See /usr/share/doc/b
14 matches
Mail list logo
