Patrick O'Callaghan schrieb:
Hello!
As I said earlier, it would be useful to keep only the latest versions,
i.e. when a package is updated, remove the old cached rpm. Maybe that's
what keepcache=1 already does, but the man page is not clear.
You could use repomanage (a part of yum-utils
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 17:35 +0200, Adalbert Prokop wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan schrieb:
Hello!
As I said earlier, it would be useful to keep only the latest versions,
i.e. when a package is updated, remove the old cached rpm. Maybe that's
what keepcache=1 already does, but the man page
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Suvayu Ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.comfatkasuvayu%2bli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday 15 August 2009 12:35 PM, Jay Mistry wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 23:32:48 +0530,
Jay
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 02:00:14 +0530,
Jay Mistry jaylinu...@gmail.com wrote:
Are they to be copied from /var/cache/yum to the dir that is to be used as
local repo ? On my PC (this is a non-networked desktop PC), this directory
has:
/fedora/packages/ /updates/packages - both
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 02:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If the rpms are currently in the cache directory you'd want them
someplace else so that they don't get deleted by yum.
Or set yum to not delete the cache...
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 23:52 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 02:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If the rpms are currently in the cache directory you'd want them
someplace else so that they don't get deleted by yum.
Or set yum to not delete the cache...
+1
An option to not delete
On 08/15/2009 08:22 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 02:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If the rpms are currently in the cache directory you'd want them
someplace else so that they don't get deleted by yum.
Or set yum to not delete the cache...
Which you can do by editing
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 09:06 -0600, Stuart McGraw wrote:
On 08/15/2009 08:22 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 02:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If the rpms are currently in the cache directory you'd want them
someplace else so that they don't get deleted by yum.
Or set yum to not
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 23:32:48 +0530,
Jay Mistry jaylinu...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to re-install Fedora 10 on a home desktop PC. In regard to this:
Is it possible to have a local cache/ repository of all
1) Updates
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 01:05:29 +0530,
Jay Mistry jaylinu...@gmail.com wrote:
As an extension of this: is it possible to upgrade a Fedora 10 install to
Fedora 11, by using the Fedora 11 DVD as a local repository ? This would
save me (and also lot of other people who do not have fast
On Saturday 15 August 2009 12:35 PM, Jay Mistry wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 23:32:48 +0530,
Jay Mistryjaylinu...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to re-install Fedora 10 on a home desktop PC. In regard to this:
Is it possible
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 10:40 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
An option to not delete the latest version of installed packages from
the cache would be useful in some scenarios, e.g. cloning an
installation.
I wish there was an easy way to specify 2 or 3 versions of all packages
should be kept.
I had to re-install Fedora 10 on a home desktop PC. In regard to this:
Is it possible to have a local cache/ repository of all
1) Updates (Critical, Security, Bug-fixes), and
2) Additional installed rpm's (that were installed through PackageKit), e.g.
Opera, Adobe Reader, etc.
so that I do not
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 23:32:48 +0530,
Jay Mistry jaylinu...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to re-install Fedora 10 on a home desktop PC. In regard to this:
Is it possible to have a local cache/ repository of all
1) Updates (Critical, Security, Bug-fixes), and
2) Additional installed rpm's (that
14 matches
Mail list logo
