On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 05:00 +, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
It looks like a lot of people were complaining about such reports
and asked to turn it off.
I'd be surprised if those sort of people even read the root mail, so I
wouldn't expect them to see, or even know about, a logwatch report
I don't see logwatch installed by default in f12. Is there a preferred
substitute these days, or should I just yum install logwatch to
get it back?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:55:15 +
Tom Horsley wrote:
I don't see logwatch installed by default in f12. Is there a preferred
substitute these days, or should I just yum install logwatch to
get it back?
I poked around some and didn't find any info on some substitute,
so yum install logwatch
Tom Horsley wrote:
I don't see logwatch installed by default in f12. Is there a
preferred substitute these days, or should I just yum install
logwatch to get it back?
I poked around some and didn't find any info on some substitute, so
yum install logwatch has been executed :-).
I installed
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:53:08 -0500
Todd Zullinger wrote:
Did you install via a live image or something else?
I installed from the DVD iso image. I guess it isn't on that
(I didn't add any network repos at install time either).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Tom Horsley wrote:
I installed from the DVD iso image. I guess it isn't on that (I
didn't add any network repos at install time either).
Apparently it's not. Good call. I guess that settles that minor
mystery. :)
--
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
Tom Horsley tom.hors...@att.net wrote:
I don't see logwatch installed by default in f12. Is there a preferred
substitute these days, or should I just yum install logwatch to
get it back?
After installation from DVD, I also missed some kind of daily
system report (be it generated
Greetings all;
Fedora 10 install, pretty well upto date, quad core phenom 9550, 4GB ram,
kernel 2.6.30-rc2. Uptime is about 6 days.
I noticed my machine was lagging badly, so I took a look with htop, and
/usr/bin/perl /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/shared/onlyservice init
is using 99% of a core
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 09:28:54 Gene Heskett wrote:
I noticed my machine was lagging badly, so I took a look with htop,
and
/usr/bin/perl /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/shared/onlyservice init
is using 99% of a core (4 core machine) and /dev/sda3 is showing
about a 15Meg/sec continuous read
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Garry T. Williams wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 09:28:54 Gene Heskett wrote:
I noticed my machine was lagging badly, so I took a look with htop,
and
/usr/bin/perl /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/shared/onlyservice init
is using 99% of a core (4 core machine) and /dev
What does this mean? Obviously something happened once, good or bad,
then what?
- Named Begin
Received control channel commands
stop: 1 Time(s)
**Unmatched Entries**
max open files (1024) is smaller than max sockets (4096): 1 Time(s)
Bob Goodwin wrote:
What does this mean? Obviously something happened once, good or bad,
then what?
- Named Begin
Received control channel commands
stop: 1 Time(s)
**Unmatched Entries**
max open files (1024) is smaller than max
Steven Stern wrote:
Bob Goodwin wrote:
What does this mean? Obviously something happened once, good or bad,
then what?
- Named Begin
Received control channel commands
stop: 1 Time(s)
**Unmatched Entries**
max open files (1024) is
Can anyone explain what this is about in my logwatch mail:
--- Connections (secure-log) Begin
**Unmatched Entries**
gdm-session-worker: gkr-pam: no password is available for user: 1 Time(s)
useradd: failed adding user `ntp', data deleted: 1 Time(s
I posted this message last week but didn'yt get any replies.
Trying again...
Steve zep...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
Every time I boot my machine I get a message like this in logwatch
WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
ACPI Error (nseval-0159): I ...: 12 Time(s)
$ uname -r
2.6.27.15
Every time I boot my machine I get a message like this in logwatch
WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
ACPI Error (nseval-0159): I ...: 12 Time(s)
$ uname -r
2.6.27.15-78.2.23.fc9.x86_64
I don't see anything in /var/log/messages and in /var/log/dmesg I see:
ACPI Error (nseval-0159
On occasion I get two logwatch reports for the same day. Usually 4
hours and 2 minutes later. Any ideas where to look for the problem?
Thanks,
--
Knute Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:53:12 -0800
Knute Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On occasion I get two logwatch reports for the same day. Usually 4
hours and 2 minutes later. Any ideas where to look for the problem?
Had you rebooted your system around that time? For me it was the
anacron service
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:53:12 -0800
Knute Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On occasion I get two logwatch reports for the same day. Usually 4
hours and 2 minutes later. Any ideas where to look for the problem?
Had you rebooted your system around that time? For me
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:53:12 -0800
Knute Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On occasion I get two logwatch reports for the same day. Usually 4
hours and 2 minutes later. Any ideas where to look for the problem?
Had you rebooted your system around that time? For me
Björn Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Schwartz wrote:
Perhaps the references to just localhost in the config files I posted in
my prior reply need to be expanded/altered to be more explicit to
localdomain?
I think your configuration is OK but you can test it by sending mail to
Björn Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Schwartz wrote:
There is no reference to ghost.localhost.com or the IP address that was
referenced in the error messages anywhere on my system (at least in the
places that I have looked, which include the relevant config files.)
Are there any
Björn Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Schwartz wrote:
Over the past couple of weeks or so, I have noted new error messages in
Logwatch pertaining to Postfix.
[...]
1 Oct 5 21:38:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[7960]: connect to
ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed
Marc Schwartz wrote:
Over the past couple of weeks or so, I have noted new error messages in
Logwatch pertaining to Postfix.
[...]
1 Oct 5 21:38:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[7960]: connect to
ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
10.11.12.13 is in the private address
Marc Schwartz wrote:
There is no reference to ghost.localhost.com or the IP address that was
referenced in the error messages anywhere on my system (at least in the
places that I have looked, which include the relevant config files.)
Are there any references to localhost.com or just localhost?
Marc Schwartz wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you change the firewall or mail configuration on
ghost.localhost.com? If ghost.localhost.com is the local machine,
then you should be using localhost (127.0.0.1) and not
ghost.localhost.com to send mail to.
Hi Mikkel,
Hi all,
Over the past couple of weeks or so, I have noted new error messages in
Logwatch pertaining to Postfix. I use Postfix and Dovecot to support an
IMAP configuration for the local delivery of root's e-mail to my user
account, with Thunderbird as the client. These messages had not appeared
Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi all,
Over the past couple of weeks or so, I have noted new error messages in
Logwatch pertaining to Postfix. I use Postfix and Dovecot to support an
IMAP configuration for the local delivery of root's e-mail to my user
account, with Thunderbird as the client
Mikkel L. Ellertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi all,
Over the past couple of weeks or so, I have noted new error messages in
Logwatch pertaining to Postfix. I use Postfix and Dovecot to support an
IMAP configuration for the local delivery of root's e-mail to my user
I wrote:
You need to plan around a security problem being found with your version
of ipop3d. Either you need to follow the appropriate security lists, and
be ready to patch your version of ipop3d quickly, or you need to use a
supported operating system which will do this for you.
Roberto
Hi,
I'm getting a lot of this entries in the LogWatch mail under ipop3d section:
Success, while reading line user=appowner
host=customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net [200.123.149.157]: 1
Time(s)
Success, while reading line user=mysql
host=customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net
Roberto Figueroa wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting a lot of this entries in the LogWatch mail under ipop3d
section:
Success, while reading line user=appowner
host=customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net
http://customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net [200.123.149.157
http://200.123.149.157]: 1
Time(s
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Roberto Figueroa wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting a lot of this entries in the LogWatch mail under ipop3d
section:
Success, while reading line user=appowner
host=customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net
http://customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net [200.123.149.157
http
Roberto Figueroa wrote:
I'm getting a lot of this entries in the LogWatch mail under ipop3d
section:
Success, while reading line user=appowner
host=customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net
http://customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net [200.123.149.157
http://200.123.149.157]: 1
Time(s
-- Forwarded message --
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
It looks like john is checking his mail from home/work using
iplannetworks.net as their ISP.
the problem is I don't have user john neither mysql, appowner :-/
so it appears to be a brute force attack ?
how do I know
From: James Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to plan around a security problem being found with your version
of ipop3d. Either you need to follow the appropriate security lists, and
be ready to patch your version of ipop3d quickly, or you need to use a
supported operating system which
Hi,
I'm getting a lot of this entries in the LogWatch mail under ipop3d section:
Success, while reading line user=appowner
host=customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net [200.123.149.157]: 1
Time(s)
Success, while reading line user=mysql
host=customer123-149-157.iplannetworks.net
2008/7/21 Knute Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for the response. Some others have suggested that is where the
problem lies as well. I'm not sure why denyhosts sometimes puts a name
rather than an IP. I guess I'll have to see if there is a denyhosts list
and ask there.
There is a config
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:38:58 -0700
Knute Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really know what the log message means. Why would it specify
line 2305 but then show another address in the log message? Any
enlightenment would be appreciated.
I had a lot of trouble with
I am running F9 with denyhosts and my deny.hosts file has a lot of
entries. I'm getting the following log entries for sendmail:
warning: /etc/hosts.deny, line 2305: can't verify hostname:
getaddrinfo(121.246.40.136.dynamic-hyderabad.vsnl.net.in, AF_INET)
failed: 1 Time(s)
warning:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:17 +0200, KAPTURKIEWICZ Patrick wrote:
The Dept of Agriculture in Texas used it to monitor hundreds of machines
on their intranet. It was free, very basic, and it worked like a charm.
For the life of me, I cannot remember the name of it, for the life of
me. But,
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 23:20:39 Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm actually running a dovecot/IMAP server on the machine, alfred,
that I want the email sent to.
I read my email on my laptops from this server.
This works beautifully.
If you changed to postfix-sendmail I could tell you exactly how to
,
and am trying to find out if this belief is justified.
Hmm, if you're a fetchmail guru, why not use that? Send the logwatch
reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then on Alfred use fetchmail every 5 minutes to
fetch [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s mail.
This would require me to run a POP3 or IMAP server on helen, I
Tim wrote:
Maybe I shouldn't
define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp.eircom.net')dnl
If you have a properly set up local DNS and mail system, then your
internal mail will be handled all internally, and mail that goes to
outside addresses will be relayed from your SMTP server to the ISP's.
Tim:
If you have a properly set up local DNS and mail system, then your
internal mail will be handled all internally, and mail that goes to
outside addresses will be relayed from your SMTP server to the ISP's.
That's the smart part about it - it working out what's internal or
external, and
try that and tell you what happens.
As I said, it used to be simple to forward logwatch to a local machine.
(I'm thinking 2 or 3 years ago, possibly pre-Fedora, on Redhat systems.)
I'm not sure what has changed.
The one other thing you'll need to do if you haven't already, is
configure
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 13:52 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I think that is exactly my problem -
sendmail is not distinguishing properly between internal and external
mail.
This is usual with MTAs. Their world view distinguishes pretty much
between mail I am accepting for my input queue, to be
Steven Tardy wrote:
It seems to be more difficult than I thought
to send email from one machine on a LAN to another.
echo alfred.gayleard.com esmtp:[192.168.2.1] /etc/mail/mailertable
/etc/init.d/sendmail restart
Thanks very much.
That certainly changed things.
According to
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Steven Tardy wrote:
It seems to be more difficult than I thought
to send email from one machine on a LAN to another.
echo alfred.gayleard.com esmtp:[192.168.2.1] /etc/mail/mailertable
/etc/init.d/sendmail restart
Thanks very much.
That certainly changed things.
Steven Tardy wrote:
echo alfred.gayleard.com esmtp:[192.168.2.1] /etc/mail/mailertable
/etc/init.d/sendmail restart
Thanks very much.
That certainly changed things.
According to /var/log/maillog on helen the email was sent
without involving my ISP:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:29:20PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
No, the IP address of alfred is 192.168.2.1 ,
as it says in /etc/mail/mailertable on helen:
alfred.gayleard.com esmtp:[192.168.2.1]
Thanks for your help.
I'll pursue the missing message -
I should be able to work out
On 4. juuni 2008. a. 2:56, Timothy Murphy wrote
How can I get the logwatch report on one machine (helen.gayleard.com)
sent to another machine (alfred.gayleard.com) on the same LAN?
I tried editing /etc/aliases on the first machine,
changing the last line to
root: [EMAIL
? Could it be that
his machine has the hostname set as 'alfred' and is on the
gayleard.com network, so thinks of itself as alfred.gayleard.com, but
his ISP (gayleard?) has not set things up so that DNS can resolve that
name?
Anyhow, logwatch may or may not be configured correctly, but the
reports
Craig White wrote:
Speaking of which, you could try changing the mailto field in
/etc/logwatch/conf/logwatch.conf.
This file was empty (except for a comment line) on my Fedora-9 system.
But I've added
---
MailTo = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MailFrom = Logwatch
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 19:52 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Craig White wrote:
Speaking of which, you could try changing the mailto field in
/etc/logwatch/conf/logwatch.conf.
This file was empty (except for a comment line) on my Fedora-9 system.
But I've added
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that these names are not known to the real world.
But I imagine that there must be some way of sending email
from one machine on a LAN to another
I can think of four ways, there could be more:
* use 'real' DNS
*
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 09:05 -1000, Dave Burns wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that these names are not known to the real world.
But I imagine that there must be some way of sending email
from one machine on a LAN to another
I can
g wrote:
also curious if you have considered either a cron to copy files over
your own lan to like '/var/log/lan.new/*.timestamp'.
another cron or what ever to kick them into logwatch.
read about it in one of my networking books. said to be easier
and better. have not had need to try
Frederick William New wrote:
How can I get the logwatch report on one machine (helen.gayleard.com)
sent to another machine (alfred.gayleard.com) on the same LAN?
It seems to be more difficult than I thought
to send email from one machine on a LAN to another.
Is there some line I could add
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 20:33 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Frederick William New wrote:
How can I get the logwatch report on one machine (helen.gayleard.com)
sent to another machine (alfred.gayleard.com) on the same LAN?
It seems to be more difficult than I thought
to send email from
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 20:33 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Frederick William New wrote:
How can I get the logwatch report on one machine (helen.gayleard.com)
sent to another machine (alfred.gayleard.com) on the same LAN?
It seems to be more difficult than I thought
to send
to incoming packets.
I don't really want my logwatch report to go to my ISP.
If I did there would be no problem, I would send the email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , which is my email address.
My hope is that it is possible to send email locally
without involving anything outside one's own system.
I still
Dave Burns wrote:
I realize that these names are not known to the real world.
But I imagine that there must be some way of sending email
from one machine on a LAN to another
I can think of four ways, there could be more:
* use 'real' DNS
* make your own DNS server locally
* put name in
Craig White wrote:
/etc/hosts is easy, but will break whenever the IP numbers change.
unless I am missing something here, mail will still not work because it
will still query for a MX record for the domain and thus /etc/hosts is
not suitable for mail handling
But does sendmail always
, I'll try that and tell you what happens.
As I said, it used to be simple to forward logwatch to a local machine.
(I'm thinking 2 or 3 years ago, possibly pre-Fedora, on Redhat systems.)
I'm not sure what has changed.
Also on that system, you will need to make it a POP3/IMAP
server so you can
, that
would explain why you don't receive any. If on the other system,
irrelevant.
I don't really want my logwatch report to go to my ISP.
My hope is that it is possible to send email locally
without involving anything outside one's own system.
It is possible but not easy, at leatst for me.
I still
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get the logwatch report on one machine (helen.gayleard.com)
sent to another machine (alfred.gayleard.com) on the same LAN?
I tried editing /etc/aliases on the first machine,
changing the last line
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 23:07 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Maybe I shouldn't
define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp.eircom.net')dnl
If you have a properly set up local DNS and mail system, then your
internal mail will be handled all internally, and mail that goes to
outside addresses will be relayed
] wrote:
How can I get the logwatch report on one machine (helen.gayleard.com)
sent to another machine (alfred.gayleard.com) on the same LAN?
I tried editing /etc/aliases on the first machine,
changing the last line to
root: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(and running newaliases
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 02:54 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Dave Burns wrote:
How can I get the logwatch report on one machine (helen.gayleard.com)
sent to another machine (alfred.gayleard.com) on the same LAN?
I tried editing /etc/aliases on the first machine,
changing the last line
On 2006-09-14 13:03:17 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:54:02AM +0200, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)
wrote:
at the bottom of the file. Apparently the entries in yum.log do not
contain years in their dates, so logwatch doesn't know these updates
were
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:54:02AM +0200, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)
wrote:
at the bottom of the file. Apparently the entries in yum.log do not
contain years in their dates, so logwatch doesn't know these updates
were installed a year ago instead of now. Is this something I should
-
Fedora Update Notification
FEDORA-2006-270
2006-04-04
-
Product : Fedora Core 5
Name: logwatch
Version : 7.2.1
Release
-
Fedora Update Notification
FEDORA-2006-202
2006-03-22
-
Product : Fedora Core 4
Name: logwatch
Version : 7.2.1
Release
-
Fedora Update Notification
FEDORA-2006-048
2006-01-20
-
Product : Fedora Core 4
Name: logwatch
Version : 7.0
Release
75 matches
Mail list logo
