Hi!
I've now upgraded to Fedora 9. I'm using KDE as a desktop now. My Udev
problem still exists but I can live with that. (I guess it's related to
my motherboard which is Asus A8V Deluxe which comes with wlan.)
But my current problem is something I cannot live with. I have sound
problems. I cann
As of today I cannot get sound at all. PulseAudio Volume Control keeps
ringing saying that "connection failed: connection refused". And Phonon
says that PulseAudio doesn't work. All the rest of the apps say that
they cannot do playback at all and give various error reports.
--
Antti Aspinen <[EM
Antti Aspinen wrote:
As of today I cannot get sound at all. PulseAudio Volume Control keeps
ringing saying that "connection failed: connection refused". And Phonon
says that PulseAudio doesn't work. All the rest of the apps say that
they cannot do playback at all and give various error reports.
Yes, PulseAudio server was not running. And when I tried to start it it
told me following:
ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
E: alsa-util.c: Error opening PCM device plug:dmix:0: Tiedostoa tai
hakemistoa ei ole
E: module.c: Failed to load module "module-alsa-sink" (
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 19:12 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Antti Aspinen wrote:
> > As of today I cannot get sound at all. PulseAudio Volume Control keeps
> > ringing saying that "connection failed: connection refused". And Phonon
> > says that PulseAudio doesn't work. All the rest of the apps say tha
On Sat, 31 May 2008 19:42:59 -0400 Ric Moore wrote:
> how about changing the order of the soundcard with the webcam ? Just
an
> edit of /etc/modprobe.conf ought to set it straight. The webcam is
mono,
> right? But since it is loaded first, then I would think that it is the
> default sound devic
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 19:40 +0300, Antti Aspinen wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 19:42:59 -0400 Ric Moore wrote:
> > how about changing the order of the soundcard with the webcam ? Just
> an
> > edit of /etc/modprobe.conf ought to set it straight. The webcam is
> mono,
> > right? But since it is l
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:27:52 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> Sorry, Antti. I'm still running F7 and I have no clue. I pine for
> simpler days and feel your pain. This may be even more clueless,
but
Thanks for the message Ric. It gave me one of the brightest ideas for a
few days. And by the way,
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 21:36 +0300, Antti Aspinen wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:27:52 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > Sorry, Antti. I'm still running F7 and I have no clue. I pine for
> > simpler days and feel your pain. This may be even more clueless,
> but
>
> Thanks for the message Ric. I
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 02:57 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> That's all I ever wanted. Sound out of my speakers. You would think it
> would be something made rock-solid stable many versions of Fedora
> before ...then left alone. The less layers of crap and code between the
> file and the speakers is good
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 06:43 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 02:57 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
>
> > That's all I ever wanted. Sound out of my speakers. You would think it
> > would be something made rock-solid stable many versions of Fedora
> > before ...then left alone. The less lay
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 03:03 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 06:43 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 02:57 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> >
> > > That's all I ever wanted. Sound out of my speakers. You would think it
> > > would be something made rock-solid stable many
On Thursday 05 June 2008 13:36, Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 03:03 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 06:43 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 02:57 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > > > That's all I ever wanted. Sound out of my speakers. You would think
>
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:11 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 June 2008 13:36, Craig White wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 03:03 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 06:43 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 02:57 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > > > > That's
On Thursday 05 June 2008 14:31:34 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:11 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 June 2008 13:36, Craig White wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 03:03 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 06:43 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > >
Around 03:08pm on Thursday, June 05, 2008 (UK time), Anne Wilson scrawled:
> That's less stable than 3, though :-)
No, if you saw apropriate amounts off each of the legs it will be
stable.
Steve
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting a
On Thursday 05 June 2008 15:14, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 03:08pm on Thursday, June 05, 2008 (UK time), Anne Wilson scrawled:
> > That's less stable than 3, though :-)
>
> No, if you saw apropriate amounts off each of the legs it will be
> stable.
>
Ever tried doing that? :-) No - 3-legged stoo
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:39 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 June 2008 15:14, Steve Searle wrote:
> > Around 03:08pm on Thursday, June 05, 2008 (UK time), Anne Wilson scrawled:
> > > That's less stable than 3, though :-)
> >
> > No, if you saw apropriate amounts off each of the legs it wi
On Thursday 05 June 2008 16:33:48 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Somewhat OT, but there's a proof that a 4-legged table (under the above
> conditions) can always be placed in a stable -- i.e. non-rocking --
> position on an irregular (but non-stepped) surface by rotating it about
> its vertical axis.
19 matches
Mail list logo
