Mark Haney wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant
that just connects on bootup.
I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse.
But, they have that feature already. It's the way network interfaces
have started
William Case venit, vidit, dixit 18.03.2009 18:55:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 17:35 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
Hi;
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:26 +0200, Antti J. Huhtala wrote:
ke, 2009-03-18 kello 08:22 +0100, Kevin Kofler kirjoitti:
Aaron Konstam wrote:
And the latest NM can be configured to connect on boot.
1. What do you mean by the latest NM?
I get
[...@mary ~]$ grep NetworkManager /var/log/rpmpkgs
NetworkManager-0.7.0.99-3.fc10.i386.rpm
On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:11:19 Richard England wrote:
Mark Haney wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant
that just connects on bootup.
I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse.
But, they have that
William Case wrote:
I agree completely. The problem seems to be in the NetworkManager
Applet. First, there is no manual. Secondly, it seems to lack any
ability to affect the function of NetworkManager -- at least at the
simplest level. I can't use it to disconnect, if for some reason I
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 00:24 -0400, William Case wrote:
I agree completely. The problem seems to be in the NetworkManager
Applet. First, there is no manual. Secondly, it seems to lack any
ability to affect the function of NetworkManager -- at least at the
simplest level. I can't use it to
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Edit Connections is for primarily editing per-user settings. I think
there's also a plugin for systemwide settings which can be edited at the
same place, but Fedora is using a plugin to use the existing
system-config-network settings instead, so you have to fire up
ke, 2009-03-18 kello 08:22 +0100, Kevin Kofler kirjoitti:
William Case wrote:
I agree completely. The problem seems to be in the NetworkManager
Applet. First, there is no manual. Secondly, it seems to lack any
ability to affect the function of NetworkManager -- at least at the
simplest
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant
that just connects on bootup.
I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse.
But, they have that feature already. It's the way network interfaces
have started for a decade. Why
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:12:14 -0400
Mark Haney wrote:
As for the arguments about wireless connectivity, how many people
actually move between wireless connections? If you do it might be only
between 2, home and work.
I'm fairly certain from the empirical evidence that the NM developers
do all
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:54 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Am I alone in thinking the per user paradigm is crazy?
How many people actually have WiFi laptops used by several people
who want to connect in different ways?
How many average users would have a wireless access point that lets them
have
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:12:14 -0400
Mark Haney wrote:
As for the arguments about wireless connectivity, how many people
actually move between wireless connections? If you do it might be only
between 2, home and work.
I'm fairly certain from the empirical evidence that
Hi;
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:26 +0200, Antti J. Huhtala wrote:
ke, 2009-03-18 kello 08:22 +0100, Kevin Kofler kirjoitti:
William Case wrote:
I agree completely. The problem seems to be in the NetworkManager
Applet. First, there is no manual. Secondly, it seems to lack any
ability
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 14:18:50 Tim wrote:
PS: I'm quite sick of gmane news postings to this mailing list that
INAPPROPRIATELY set a post-to header to THEIR news server. I have to
manually remove the post-to header and manually add the proper to
header. It's quite a cheek to act as a
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 00:48 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:54 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Am I alone in thinking the per user paradigm is crazy?
How many people actually have WiFi laptops used by several people
who want to connect in different ways?
How many average users
Mark Haney wrote:
I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant
that just connects on bootup.
I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse.
But, they have that feature already. It's the way network interfaces
have started for a decade. Why bother
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
Hi;
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:26 +0200, Antti J. Huhtala wrote:
ke, 2009-03-18 kello 08:22 +0100, Kevin Kofler kirjoitti:
William Case wrote:
I agree completely. The problem seems to be in the NetworkManager
Applet. First,
On 03/18/2009 08:46:45 AM, William Case wrote:
1. A button that allows you to disconnect (turn it off)
temporarily
-- say to the next boot.
2. An Edit Connections that actually allows you to edit
connections.
3. Tie editing to root, if necessary, with the
Hi Mike;
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 04:49 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 00:24 -0400, William Case wrote:
Can't you just right click and uncheck the box that has Enabled
Networking to turn it off and then recheck again when want back online?
Not on my applet. Once it is
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 17:35 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
Hi;
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:26 +0200, Antti J. Huhtala wrote:
ke, 2009-03-18 kello 08:22 +0100, Kevin Kofler kirjoitti:
William Case wrote:
The lack of
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 09:12 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant
that just connects on bootup.
I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse.
But, they have that feature already. It's
NM sucks, everyone knows it, so let's can it and move to something that
doesn't.
Not everyone. I like it. And the latest NM can be configured to connect
on boot.
Can you edit your connections?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Mark Haney wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I had actually hoped that the profiles stuff might let me have
multiple configurations which work at multiple locations. I have three
locations needing credentials, and I'd like to have a Starbucks
configuration which found whatever was available. Doesn't
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 15:11 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
NM sucks, everyone knows it, so let's can it and move to something that
doesn't.
Not everyone. I like it. And the latest NM can be configured to connect
on boot.
Can you edit your connections?
Wireless ones with nm-applet.
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 09:12 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant
that just connects on bootup.
I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse.
But, they have that feature
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:44:30 -0500
Aaron Konstam wrote:
NM sucks, everyone knows it, so let's can it and move to something that
doesn't.
Not everyone. I like it.
I agree. I use NM on three laptops that regularly use two different wireless
access points and one EVDO modem. NM is the
Tim wrote:
PS: I'm quite sick of gmane news postings to this mailing list that
INAPPROPRIATELY set a post-to header to THEIR news server. I have to
manually remove the post-to header and manually add the proper to
header. It's quite a cheek to act as a gateway to someone else's
mailing list,
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:46 -0400, William Case wrote:
BTW, I have a desktop with a recent F10 install, fully up to date. It
has only a wired interface. That interface comes up at boot (before
login) with no problem using NM, not using the network service. I have
Hi;
For any one else who might have been following this problem:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 21:36 -0400, William Case wrote:
Hi;
I now have Fedora 10 on two systems. On both, NetworkManager fails to
connect at bootup + login. If I remember correctly, NM connected
automatically on booting when
William Case wrote:
It has been reported by someone else as a medium level bug. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470477
Or see the changelog of NetworkManager-0.7.0.99-3:
* Mon Mar 09 2009 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com - 1:0.7.0.99-3
- Missing ONBOOT should actually mean
Hi Todd;
At the risk of beating a dead horse ...
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 23:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
William Case wrote:
It has been reported by someone else as a medium level bug. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470477
Or see the changelog of
31 matches
Mail list logo
