On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 14:58 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Craig White wrote:
> > http://directory.fsf.org/project/netcat/
>
> which distributions ship that. OpenSuse isn't shipping that as far as
> I can tell. Neither is Debian stable. Fedora's never shipped that.
Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
> It seems to be a BSD license. I choosen Linux for the GPL license and
> I usually avoid the non-GPL software (Free Software) when adviced of
> that, of course.
2 clause BSD is free software, and in fact GPL-compatible. It's not
copyleft itself, but that's no reason to
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Craig White wrote:
> http://directory.fsf.org/project/netcat/
which distributions ship that. OpenSuse isn't shipping that as far as
I can tell. Neither is Debian stable. Fedora's never shipped that. It
appears to be a fork of the original codebase if I'm reading
Craig White wrote:
>> I can not find reference to the GPL in packaging of other
>> distributions that I have just checked. OpenSuse and Debian ship a
>> netcat which is effectively public domain, according to the copyright
>> notices I have found.
>
> http://directory.fsf.org/project/netcat/
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 00:41 +0100, Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Jeff Spaleta :
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano
> > wrote:
> >> Does that netcat version is shipped under BSD license, or still GNU/GPL?
> >
> > First why do you assume it was GPL before? Can you emphatica
2009/1/10 Jeff Spaleta :
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano
> wrote:
>> Does that netcat version is shipped under BSD license, or still GNU/GPL?
>
> First why do you assume it was GPL before? Can you emphatically state
> that the license on the version you are expecting was in fac
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 14:24 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano
> wrote:
> > Does that netcat version is shipped under BSD license, or still GNU/GPL?
>
> First why do you assume it was GPL before? Can you emphatically state
> that the license on the vers
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano
wrote:
> Does that netcat version is shipped under BSD license, or still GNU/GPL?
First why do you assume it was GPL before? Can you emphatically state
that the license on the version you are expecting was in fact the GPL?
I can not find reference
2009/1/9 Jeff Spaleta :
> Fedora's package uses the nc codebase from openBSD.
> rpm -qi nc
>
> We package things with the upstream project url encoded in the header
> information so you know exactly where the sourcecode base is coming
> from in our packages. Do the other distributions you use do t
Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
Hi list.
I recently installed Fedora and today I got a little time after work
to configure it on my laptop. The first thing I did was configure the
network to access to the internet and to my LAN at home. To test the
connection I used netcat to listen to a dummy port,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano
wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I recently installed Fedora and today I got a little time after work
> to configure it on my laptop. The first thing I did was configure the
> network to access to the internet and to my LAN at home. To test the
> connectio
Hi list.
I recently installed Fedora and today I got a little time after work
to configure it on my laptop. The first thing I did was configure the
network to access to the internet and to my LAN at home. To test the
connection I used netcat to listen to a dummy port, as I usually do.
The thing
12 matches
Mail list logo
