Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Tom Horsley
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:24:35 +0100 Alan Cox wrote: > Old ??? > > I have a 386 here, and a DEC VT220 terminal. Pentium II is merely > "recent". I've got a model 12 5bit baudot code western union teletype! But my old 16 bit x86 something (I forget what chip it had) recently went to the electronic

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread alan
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Alan Cox wrote: I have a friend with an even older box that I'm working hard to rescue. That one has a 4 Gb SCSI hard drive and a Pentium II. It is old, old, old, equipment. It runs OpenServer 5.0.4 which is another migraine headache for me. That's my opinion of old hardwa

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Alan Cox
> > > I have a friend with an even older box that I'm working hard to rescue. > That one has a 4 Gb SCSI hard drive and a Pentium II. It is old, old, > old, equipment. It runs OpenServer 5.0.4 which is another migraine > headache for me. That's my opinion of old hardware. Old ??? I have a

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >> F11 is -march=i586 -mtune=generic, F12 is going to be -march=i686 >> -mtune=atom. Everything from PPro up is i686, so everything should work >> just fine. > > VIA processors such as the C3 are PPro compatible *but* the GNU C > compiler definition

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Robert L Cochran wrote: > > My advice to you is to give the Pentium III box to a charity, and get > yourself a new quad core Intel machine. Why Intel? I prefer to support the underdog. Plus, AMD Opteron is better. ;-) I didn't say that was my only machine. It's an

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Robert L Cochran
On 06/23/2009 09:52 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: I´m contemplating what to do with one of my old desktops which is a dual Pentium III, 650Mhz, with 1 Gig of RAM and ATA-33 hard disk controller, plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI video adapters (video chipset? I don´t even remember) for a dual-dis

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Alan Cox
> F11 is -march=i586 -mtune=generic, F12 is going to be -march=i686 > -mtune=atom. Everything from PPro up is i686, so everything should work > just fine. VIA processors such as the C3 are PPro compatible *but* the GNU C compiler definition of i686 is (was ?) broken and incorrectly used cmov witho

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 14:00 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Fernando Cassia wrote: > > All PIIIs are single cores, AFAIK. Mine is dual in the sense of having > > two CPUs, including heatsink. You know, good ole "SMP" before the > > multicore craze started. > > > > Good to know F11 runs OK. I wasn´t

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Bill Davidsen
Fernando Cassia wrote: 2009/6/23 Alan Evans : On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: I惴 contemplating what to do with one of my old desktops which is a dual Pentium III, 650Mhz, with 1 Gig of RAM and ATA-33 hard disk controller, plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI video adapte

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread James Kosin
Alan Evans wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> All PIIIs are single cores, AFAIK. > > Of course I knew that. In my mind, "dual" and "dual core" are the same > thing and don't necessarily mean that the cores are on the same die. > Kind of like when I say a Sun E1

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Alan Evans
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > All PIIIs are single cores, AFAIK. Of course I knew that. In my mind, "dual" and "dual core" are the same thing and don't necessarily mean that the cores are on the same die. Kind of like when I say a Sun E1 is 64-core, I don't mean on

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Alan Cox
> > (Single-core Pentium III, 750MHz, 384MB RAM, Blah video hardware.) > > All PIIIs are single cores, AFAIK. Mine is dual in the sense of having Yes. > two CPUs, including heatsink. You know, good ole "SMP" before the > multicore craze started. > > Good to know F11 runs OK. I wasn´t even sure

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Cassia
2009/6/23 Alan Evans : > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> I惴 contemplating what to do with one of my old desktops which is a >> dual Pentium III, 650Mhz, with 1 Gig of RAM and >> ATA-33 hard disk controller, plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI >> video adapters (video chi

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Alan Evans
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > I惴 contemplating what to do with one of my old desktops which is a > dual Pentium III, 650Mhz, with 1 Gig of RAM and > ATA-33 hard disk controller, plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI > video adapters (video chipset? I don�� even remember)

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:52:39 -0300 > Fernando Cassia wrote: > >> plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI >> video adapters (video chipset? I don´t even remember) for a >> dual-display config. > > I was running a dual PIII with about the same specs

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Tom Horsley
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:52:39 -0300 Fernando Cassia wrote: > plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI > video adapters (video chipset? I don´t even remember) for a > dual-display config. I was running a dual PIII with about the same specs not too long ago. It wasn't horrible, but it wasn't really pepp

Re: OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Tim
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:52 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: > I´m contemplating what to do with one of my old desktops which is a > dual Pentium III, 650Mhz, with 1 Gig of RAM and ATA-33 hard disk > controller, plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI video adapters Do you have a network of computers?

OT: Dual Pentium III, good enough for current 2.6 kernel linux?

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Cassia
I´m contemplating what to do with one of my old desktops which is a dual Pentium III, 650Mhz, with 1 Gig of RAM and ATA-33 hard disk controller, plus two Elsa Gloria Synergy 8MB PCI video adapters (video chipset? I don´t even remember) for a dual-display config. Would Fedora 11 run OK in such a sy