Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

Tim wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:22 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Must be local, but I have no idea what, and now I have another F10 install which works fine, so two fine, two warning but updating. Most odd. Any of them go through a (bad) proxy? No, all behind the same firewall, going out vi

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:22 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Must be local, but I have no idea what, and now I have another F10 > install which works fine, so two fine, two warning but updating. Most > odd. Any of them go through a (bad) proxy? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.5-41.fc9.i686

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

Tim wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:59 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Since the packages are being updated, I'm somewhat dubious that an out-of-date repo is the cause here. Does your computer clock go out of whack from time to time? If your clock had gone into the future when you did an update,

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:59 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Since the packages are being updated, I'm somewhat dubious that an > out-of-date repo is the cause here. Does your computer clock go out of whack from time to time? If your clock had gone into the future when you did an update, that might

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:59:48 -0500, Bill wrote: Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: Since the packages are being updated, I'm somewhat dubious that an out-of-date repo is the cause here. The mirror-list pointed Yum at a mirror that

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:59:48 -0500, Bill wrote: > >>> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: > Since the packages are being updated, I'm somewhat dubious that an > out-of-date > repo is the cause here. The mirror-list pointed Yum at a mirror that offers metadata

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:23:23 -1000, Dave wrote: On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: I'm getting this message on two of my three FC10 installs. Any ideas (a) what caused it, and (b) if it's causing more than cosmetic damage? I'm still getting updates ap

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

Robert L Cochran wrote: I get the very same warning. I'll use Steve's yum clean all suggestion the next time I want to update. I think just cleaning the metadata is safer. Since I'm getting the the updates in spite of this message (just got all the dbus stuff over the weekend, same packages a

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:37:13 -0600, Steven wrote: > On 12/07/2008 09:16 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we > yum clean all > yum update > > should fix it. No. Bad advice. Also see my other reply in this thread. This bears the ris

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:23:23 -1000, Dave wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > I'm getting this message on two of my three FC10 installs. > > > > Any ideas (a) what caused it, and (b) if it's causing more than cosmetic > > damage? I'm still getting updates applied...

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

I get the very same warning. I'll use Steve's yum clean all suggestion the next time I want to update. Bob Bill Davidsen wrote: > I'm getting this message on two of my three FC10 installs. > > Any ideas (a) what caused it, and (b) if it's causing more than > cosmetic damage? I'm still getting u

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2008 09:16 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Dave Burns wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >> >> I'm getting this message on two of my three FC10 installs. >> >>

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

Dave Burns wrote: On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I'm getting this message on two of my three FC10 installs. Any ideas (a) what caused it, and (b) if it's causing more than cosmetic damage? I'm still getting upda

Re: Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting this message on two of my three FC10 installs. > > Any ideas (a) what caused it, and (b) if it's causing more than cosmetic > damage? I'm still getting updates applied... > > Attached to prevent mail damage. > >

Odd yum warning (error?) with FC10

I'm getting this message on two of my three FC10 installs. Any ideas (a) what caused it, and (b) if it's causing more than cosmetic damage? I'm still getting updates applied... Attached to prevent mail damage. -- Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "We have more to fear from the bungling of t