Markku Kolkka wrote:
> Steven Stern kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika perjantai, 26.
> kesäkuuta 2009):
>> Updating : 1:cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586
>>
>> Why are some packages named like that? Is the "1:"
>> meaningful?
>
> It's the epoch number, and it's the most significant part of the
> p
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:26:13 -0500,
Steven Stern wrote:
> I noticed this in yum today:
>
> Updating : 1:cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586
>
> Why are some packages named like that? Is the "1:" meaningful?
It is the epoch. It is higher priority than the version when comparing
packages for poss
Steven Stern kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika perjantai, 26.
kesäkuuta 2009):
> Updating : 1:cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586
>
> Why are some packages named like that? Is the "1:"
> meaningful?
It's the epoch number, and it's the most significant part of the
package version number. I.e. a pack
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:26:13 -0500
Steven Stern wrote:
> I noticed this in yum today:
>
> Updating : 1:cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586
>
> Why are some packages named like that? Is the "1:" meaningful?
I wondered the same thing just the other day :-).
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-lis
I noticed this in yum today:
Updating : 1:cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586
Why are some packages named like that? Is the "1:" meaningful?
--
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedora
