DB wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:53:04 +0100
Thanks to all who tried to help me out of my predicament!
2 weeks of flu + family visiting meant I didn't get a chance to follows
Anne's off-list suggestion to reinstall till last night, but I now seem
to be more or less back
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, yum solves this problem, but sadly you are trying to install
> it. ;(
>
> You can look in the package directories (the same ones the other
> packges are in) and pull down the likely packages and add them to your
> rpm command line.
>
> If
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:11:39 +0100
DB wrote:
...snip...
>
> Thanks again Kevin It seems that each time you give me another
> lead, rpm wants another 2 or 3 files.. It'd be alright if I
> could find a readable list of what is required to install an rpm!
Well, yum solves this problem, bu
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:53:04 +0100
DB wrote:
Message: 9 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:03:48 -0700 From: Kevin Fenzi
Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system
(again!) To: fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID:
<20081221170348.42475...@ohm.scrye.com> Content-Type: text
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:38:57 -0800, suvayu wrote:
> > They are found in the "gpgme" package. In the 9/Everything repo at least.
> > Be prepared that you also need "gnupg2" and "pth" as additional
> > dependencies,
> > if not installed already.
> >
>
> The way its going he will soon end up getting
2008/12/22 Michael Schwendt
> They are found in the "gpgme" package. In the 9/Everything repo at least.
> Be prepared that you also need "gnupg2" and "pth" as additional
> dependencies,
> if not installed already.
>
The way its going he will soon end up getting a really long dependency list.
cor
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:53:04 +0100
DB wrote:
> >
> > Message: 9 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:03:48 -0700 From: Kevin Fenzi
> > Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system
> > (again!) To: fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID:
> > <20081221170348.42475...@ohm.sc
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:53:04 +0100, DB wrote:
> I tried installing them t'other way around:
>
> [r...@localhost ~]# rpm -ivh
> http://mirrors.tummy.com/pub/fedora.redhat.com/fedora/linux/releases/9/Everything/i386/os//Packages/pygpgme-0.1-8.fc9.i386.rpm
>
> http://mirrors.tummy.com/pub/fedora.
Message: 9 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:03:48 -0700 From: Kevin Fenzi
Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system (again!)
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID:
<20081221170348.42475...@ohm.scrye.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii" On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:13:46 +
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 22:00:16 DB wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 21:21:01 DB wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:21:10 DB wrote:
error: Failed dependencies:
pygpgme is needed by yum-3.2.2
On Monday 22 December 2008 00:03:48 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Except that he is trying to install yum. ;)
Duh! shouldn't work when I'm tired. Sorry!
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://w
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Paul Newell wrote:
> I've been following this since it got posted trying to determine if it is a
> local problem to Dave or if there is, in fact, an issue with PackageKit
> updates on F9 (I think Anne used the phrase "dirty electricity" which I took
> mean nothing
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:13:46 +
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 22:00:16 DB wrote:
[d...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qi pygpgme
package pygpgme is not installed
[d...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qi python-iniparse
package python-iniparse is not installed
[d...@localh
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:13:46 +
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 21 December 2008 22:00:16 DB wrote:
> >
> > [d...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qi pygpgme
> > package pygpgme is not installed
> > [d...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qi python-iniparse
> > package python-iniparse is not installed
> > [d...@localhost ~
On Sunday 21 December 2008 22:00:16 DB wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 December 2008 21:21:01 DB wrote:
> >> Anne Wilson wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:21:10 DB wrote:
> error: Failed dependencies:
> pygpgme is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
> pyth
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 21:21:01 DB wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:21:10 DB wrote:
error: Failed dependencies:
pygpgme is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
python-iniparse is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
So wh
On Sunday 21 December 2008 21:21:01 DB wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:21:10 DB wrote:
> >> error: Failed dependencies:
> >> pygpgme is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
> >> python-iniparse is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
> >
> > So what happened when you
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:21:10 DB wrote:
error: Failed dependencies:
pygpgme is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
python-iniparse is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
So what happened when you installed these?
Anne
Hi Anne,
any suggestions on an ad
On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:21:10 DB wrote:
> error: Failed dependencies:
> pygpgme is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
> python-iniparse is needed by yum-3.2.20-5.fc9.noarch
So what happened when you installed these?
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:18:22 -0700
From: Kevin Fenzi
Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system (again!)
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:36:30 +0100
DB wrote:
Hi Kevin, thanks for the speedy reply... My responses are in-line:
> Evening all,
>
> I just did the latest
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:12:37 + From: Richard Hughes
Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system
(again!) To: freddog...@yahoo.co.uk, "Community assistance,
encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
Message-ID: <1229854357.3382.6.ca...@hughsie-work.lan> Content-T
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 22:36 +0100, DB wrote:
> I just did the latest batch of F9 PackageKit updates - with disastrous
> effect! (See attached list)
I don't see how applying the updates removed yum. Did you try removing
yum manually?
Richard.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
T
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:36:30 +0100
DB wrote:
> Evening all,
>
> I just did the latest batch of F9 PackageKit updates - with
> disastrous effect! (See attached list)
Quite strange. How did you apply those updates?
PackageKit? yum? With what command?
Is there anything non standard in your /etc
Evening all,
I just did the latest batch of F9 PackageKit updates - with disastrous
effect! (See attached list)
I think (!) RPM is still working but Packagekit & yum amongst (many)
others have gone. I've tried to re enable the rpmfusion reps & rpm
tells me that the latest ones are installe
24 matches
Mail list logo
