On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Dave Cross wrote:
2008/11/27 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In F10, I cannot compile neither Perl-RPM nor Perl-RPM2.
Am I boned?
Looks like the Fedora Perl package maintainers might have reached the
same conclusion. RPM2 was included in Fedora 9, but appears to have
2008/11/27 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In F10, I cannot compile neither Perl-RPM nor Perl-RPM2.
Am I boned?
Looks like the Fedora Perl package maintainers might have reached the
same conclusion. RPM2 was included in Fedora 9, but appears to have
been dropped for Fedora 10.
2008/11/27 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thought, perhaps, there might be a replacement package for Perl bindings
for RPM.
It looks like there might be.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RPM4/
I assume that the '4' in its name means that it's based on RPM 4.x.
But it doesn't seem to be any
Dave Cross writes:
2008/11/27 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thought, perhaps, there might be a replacement package for Perl bindings
for RPM.
It looks like there might be.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RPM4/
I assume that the '4' in its name means that it's based on RPM 4.x.
But it
In F10, I cannot compile neither Perl-RPM nor Perl-RPM2.
Am I boned?
pgptz9f60IsLb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
In F10, I cannot compile neither Perl-RPM nor Perl-RPM2.
Am I boned?
No idea if you're boned or not, but rpm-4.6 was a major update to rpm,
so I'd guess that any bindings will need some changes. Are either of
those bindings actively maintained?
--
ToddOpenPGP
Todd Zullinger writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
In F10, I cannot compile neither Perl-RPM nor Perl-RPM2.
Am I boned?
No idea if you're boned or not, but rpm-4.6 was a major update to rpm,
so I'd guess that any bindings will need some changes. Are either of
those bindings actively maintained?
