On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Claude Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2008 18:12:39 Curt Stauffer wrote:
>> Good suggestion - I had a USB Ethernet adapter which I plugged in,
>> configured via s-c-network for DHCP and the new adapter is working
>> just fine. I'm thinki
On Thursday 04 December 2008 18:12:39 Curt Stauffer wrote:
> Good suggestion - I had a USB Ethernet adapter which I plugged in,
> configured via s-c-network for DHCP and the new adapter is working
> just fine. I'm thinking that implies that there is something wrong
> with the "tulip" driver that c
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Claude Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2008 14:05:12 Curt Stauffer wrote:
>> Network card is working just fine - booted from a Ubuntu Live CD I had
>> laying around and no problems.
>>
>> I then tried a F10 Live CD - had network for a few
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 14:05:12 Curt Stauffer wrote:
> Network card is working just fine - booted from a Ubuntu Live CD I had
> laying around and no problems.
>
> I then tried a F10 Live CD - had network for a few moments and
> suddenly the network widget thing up in the upper left hand corn
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Claude Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2008 16:46:52 Curt Stauffer wrote:
>> OK, I admit it - I messed up. At first when I decided to switch to
>> DHCP I also switched NM on (it was disabled since I was originally
>> using a static address)
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 16:46:52 Curt Stauffer wrote:
> OK, I admit it - I messed up. At first when I decided to switch to
> DHCP I also switched NM on (it was disabled since I was originally
> using a static address). When I did this I *think* that I got a valid
> ip and gateway. I've now s
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Claude Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2008 14:15:18 Curt Stauffer wrote:
>> Switching to DHCP made no difference, although I did notice that the
>> DHCP negotiaton must have happened because I saw reasonable-looking IP
>> numbers for the wo
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 14:15:18 Curt Stauffer wrote:
> Switching to DHCP made no difference, although I did notice that the
> DHCP negotiaton must have happened because I saw reasonable-looking IP
> numbers for the workstation and gateway.
>
> I feel like I'm missing something really obvious h
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Curt Stauffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Claude Jones
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon December 1 2008, Curt Stauffer wrote:
>>> One unusual thing is that I see
>>> quite a few "errors" in the packets sent part of the ifconfig
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Claude Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon December 1 2008, Curt Stauffer wrote:
>> One unusual thing is that I see
>> quite a few "errors" in the packets sent part of the ifconfig display,
>> which is unusual for my network connection (at work on the
>> Univer
On Mon December 1 2008, Curt Stauffer wrote:
> One unusual thing is that I see
> quite a few "errors" in the packets sent part of the ifconfig display,
> which is unusual for my network connection (at work on the
> University's Academic network, rock solid).
could it be something as dumb as a bad
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:16:43 -0500
> "Curt Stauffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'd appreciate any suggestions for troubleshooting this. I'm not new
>> to Linux but spoiled since I've had virtually no problems since RH7 o
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:16:43 -0500
"Curt Stauffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd appreciate any suggestions for troubleshooting this. I'm not new
> to Linux but spoiled since I've had virtually no problems since RH7 or
> so.
Sometimes some part of the networking stuff overwrites /etc/resolv.co
I searched but didn't find a situation that looked similar to what I
just encountered. This AM I upgraded my F9 box (static IP) to F10.
Now I seem to have no network connectivity, despite the fact that
Network Manager is showing as disabled and s-c-network looks just fine
(including the right netm
14 matches
Mail list logo
