You need to open the ports in your firewall (iptables).
John
William Case wrote:
Hi;
I am having newbie problems with boinc, ports and SELinux -- I think.
Networks and SELinux are two subjects I have put off learning to any
rudimentary depth. So here goes.
I can get Boinc to connect to the
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:19 -0400, John Munn wrote:
> You need to open the ports in your firewall (iptables).
Didn't have iptables running. I do now with ports 80 and 443 set as
trusted -- still nothing.
Do I have to move or link some file(s) from /var/lib/boinc to $HOME?
>
> John
>
>
> Wil
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 23:22 -0400, William Case wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:19 -0400, John Munn wrote:
> > You need to open the ports in your firewall (iptables).
> Didn't have iptables running. I do now with ports 80 and 443 set as
> trusted -- still nothing.
>
> Do I have to move or lin
Hi Craig;
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 20:55 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 23:22 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:19 -0400, John Munn wrote:
> > > You need to open the ports in your firewall (iptables).
> > Didn't have iptables running. I do now with ports 80 a
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 00:44 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Hi Craig;
>
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 20:55 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 23:22 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:19 -0400, John Munn wrote:
> > > > You need to open the ports in your firewall (ipt
Hi Craig;
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:54 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 00:44 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > Hi Craig;
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 20:55 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 23:22 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:19 -04
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 01:45 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Hi Craig;
>
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:54 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 00:44 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > > Hi Craig;
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 20:55 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 2
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 22:52 -0700, Craig White wrote:
[big snip]
>
> yum install mod_ssl
> service httpd restart
>
Port 443 now appears in netstat. Thanks.
Boinc still not working -- but that is an application problem to be
figured out in the morning.
> seems hard to believe that mod_ssl w
Craig White kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai, 28.
kesäkuuta 2008):
>
> don't know anything about BOINC but do you have/need httpd
> running (sounds like it)
You don't need httpd to run the BOINC client. It doesn't need any
incoming firewall ports open either. I think this thread
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 23:22 -0400, William Case wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:19 -0400, John Munn wrote:
>> > You need to open the ports in your firewall (iptables).
>> Didn't have iptables running. I do now with ports 80 and 443 set as
>> trusted -- still nothing.
>>
>> Do I have to move
Hi Markku;
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 12:37 +0300, Markku Kolkka wrote:
> Craig White kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai, 28.
> kesäkuuta 2008):
> >
> > don't know anything about BOINC but do you have/need httpd
> > running (sounds like it)
>
> You don't need httpd to run the BOINC clie
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 09:50 -0400, William Case wrote:
> My problem is I keep getting this error message from bonicmgr: "BOINC is
> unable to communicate with a project and needs an Internet connection.
> "Please connect to the Internet, then select the 'retry communications'
> item off the advanc
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 AM, William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But... Any suggestions on how I get my boinc working.
>
> --
> Regards Bill;
> Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.2
> Evo.2.22.2, Emacs 22.2.1
>
>
Greetings William,
I have used the following site to get my boinc going:
http://www.gaz
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 15:59 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 06:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 16:19 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > >
> > >> If it can't I will try Patrick's Network Manager solution.
> > >>
> > >> If that works, I th
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 19:57 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 22:52 -0400, William Case wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> report it just like you did above...if the packager has questions, he'll
> ask but I would suggest that you file it against NetworkManager package.
>
> It's important to
Hi;
I give up. I am filing a bug.
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 09:48 -0600, Tom Weniger wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 AM, William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But... Any suggestions on how I get my boinc working.
> >
> > --
> Greetings William,
>
> I have used the following site to
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 14:30 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I give up. I am filing a bug.
>
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 09:48 -0600, Tom Weniger wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 AM, William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > But... Any suggestions on how I get my boinc working.
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 12:51 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 14:30 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I give up. I am filing a bug.
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 09:48 -0600, Tom Weniger wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 AM, William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi Craig;
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 12:51 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 14:30 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I give up. I am filing a bug.
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 09:48 -0600, Tom Weniger wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 AM, William Case <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 16:19 -0400, William Case wrote:
> If it can't I will try Patrick's Network Manager solution.
>
> If that works, I then have to decide whether this is a Network Manager
> bug; a Boinc bug; or both. Of course, if boincmgr does successfully
> reconnect to WCG and download add
Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 16:19 -0400, William Case wrote:
If it can't I will try Patrick's Network Manager solution.
If that works, I then have to decide whether this is a Network Manager
bug; a Boinc bug; or both. Of course, if boincmgr does successfully
reconnect to WCG and
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 06:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 16:19 -0400, William Case wrote:
> >
> >> If it can't I will try Patrick's Network Manager solution.
> >>
> >> If that works, I then have to decide whether this is a Network Manager
> >> bug; a Boin
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 06:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> If the analysis of NM starting too late in the boot process is
> correct, wouldn't one of these make life a bit more tolerable?
> Keeping in mind that I don't use F9, NM, or BOINC. :-)
>
> 1. Change the script number in /etc/init.d of NM to
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 14:10 +0930, Tim wrote:
> It strikes me that something is *really* broken with Network Manager.
> Other services wait until they start before returning to the next item
> in the startup sequence. Network Manager seems to be returning as
> ready, before it is, and buggering u
It strikes me that something is *really* broken with Network Manager.
Other services wait until they start before returning to the next item
in the startup sequence. Network Manager seems to be returning as
ready, before it is, and buggering up other things that follow.
My experience wit
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Mike Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> It strikes me that something is *really* broken with Network Manager.
>>> Other services wait until they start before returning to the next item
>>> in the startup sequence. Network Manager seems to be returning as
>>>
Mike Evans wrote:
> For machines with a wired connection I have been in the habit of
> disabling NM and using the good old network service. Works like a dream
> and doesn't need tampering with. You can do that through the
> Admin->services gui if you don't like fiddling with the links in the
> i
[snip]
> If that works, I then have to decide whether this is a Network Manager
> bug; a Boinc bug; or both. Of course, if boincmgr does successfully
bug; a Boinc bug; or both. Of course, if boinc-clent does successfully
> reconnect to WCG and download additional work units, I will write the
>
Hi Patrick and Craig;
Thanks a million, I would and thousands of others would never have
guessed NetworkManager was BOINC's problem in a thousand years.
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 12:51 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 14:30 -0400, William Case wrote:
>
> I believe that what Pat
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 22:52 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Hi Patrick and Craig;
>
> Thanks a million, I would and thousands of others would never have
> guessed NetworkManager was BOINC's problem in a thousand years.
>
> On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 12:51 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-06-28
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 22:52 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Thanks a million, I would and thousands of others would never have
> guessed NetworkManager was BOINC's problem in a thousand years.
Lucky guesses sometimes work out :-)
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscrib
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 22:52 -0400, William Case wrote:
> I then added '/sbin/service boinc-client restart'
> to /etc/rc.d/rc.local and re-booted once again. --BINGO
Seeing as the problem's with Network Manager, I'd move the restart
script away from the rc.local file to the scripts that Network
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:52:49 -0400
William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some poor unlucky shmuck could get caught from 2 days to a week trying
> to figure out what was wrong.
But there is nothing wrong! Don't you know that NetworkManager is
a vast improvement? Don't you know that any other p
Tom Horsley wrote:
I don't think any problems in NetworkManager will ever be considered
bugs until RedHat foists it on their paying RHEL customers
There is a little problem with that theory. Both Red Hat and upstream
bugzilla shows a considerable amount of bugs being filed and fixed on a
reg
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 16:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> >
> > I don't think any problems in NetworkManager will ever be considered
> > bugs until RedHat foists it on their paying RHEL customers
>
> There is a little problem with that theory. Both Red Hat and upstream
> b
Andrew Kelly wrote:
>> There is also a large amount of work that needs to
>> be done on fixing software that doesn't react well to network
>> connections disappearing underneath them as happens often with wireless
>> networks on laptops and mobile systems.
>>
>> Rahul
> As much as I am "not a fa
Timothy Murphy wrote:
But this was a specific, concrete query.
Why does NM wait until the user has logged in to start?
That's a wrong assumption. NM doesn't wait until the user has started.
It is a system service which starts at boot. nm-applet(GNOME) or
Knetworkmanager (KDE) is just a front
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> But this was a specific, concrete query.
>> Why does NM wait until the user has logged in to start?
>
> That's a wrong assumption. NM doesn't wait until the user has started.
> It is a system service which starts at boot. nm-applet(GNOME) or
> Knetworkmanager (KDE) is jus
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Sorry, Rahul, you have lost me here.
When I say that NM waits until the user logs in
I mean that NetworkManager does not connect me to my AP
until I login.
Again, you are confusing between NM and nm-applet.
Therefore any application that requires me to be connected
has t
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:30 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> >> But this was a specific, concrete query.
> >> Why does NM wait until the user has logged in to start?
> >
> > That's a wrong assumption. NM doesn't wait until the user has started.
> > It is a system service
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Think about how accessing wireless systems works. If you have to
> authenticate, then you have to be logged in to do it (or you have to
> preconfigure it). If you are a mobile user, you may have to do it
> several times--NM makes the p
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 14:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> > Think about how accessing wireless systems works. If you have to
> > authenticate, then you have to be logged in to do it (or you have to
> > preconfigure it). If you
Timothy Murphy:
>> Perhaps if there was some minimal documentation for NM this might be clear.
Rahul Sundaram:
> Perhaps if you will volunteer to contribute, it would have been done by
> now. If you want to wait for someone else to do the work, it is going to
> be done when others find time and
Tim wrote:
Timothy Murphy:
Perhaps if there was some minimal documentation for NM this might be clear.
Rahul Sundaram:
Perhaps if you will volunteer to contribute, it would have been done by
now. If you want to wait for someone else to do the work, it is going to
be done when others find ti
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Sorry, Rahul, you have lost me here.
>> When I say that NM waits until the user logs in
>> I mean that NetworkManager does not connect me to my AP
>> until I login.
>
> Again, you are confusing between NM and nm-applet.
I don't think so.
I am using the term NetworkManage
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 16:40 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Occasionally I try to access the internet from a WiFi "hotspot"
> but my experience in Ireland is that this is rarely as simple as it
> sounds.
> (Last time I tried in a pub here it turned out that they wanted me to
> pay
> the equivalent o
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 16:40 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> >> Sorry, Rahul, you have lost me here.
> >> When I say that NM waits until the user logs in
> >> I mean that NetworkManager does not connect me to my AP
> >> until I login.
> >
> > Again, you are confusing betw
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>> But it seems to me that it should be easy enough to cater for all users,
>> by having a setting in some /etc/NM.conf which will allow NM to start
>> with a specific connection before anyone logs in
>> _if that is what one wants_,
>> or if not requires the user to authent
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> Occasionally I try to access the internet from a WiFi "hotspot"
>> but my experience in Ireland is that this is rarely as simple as it
>> sounds.
>> (Last time I tried in a pub here it turned out that they wanted me to
>> pay
>> the equivalent of several pints of beer
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 14:58 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> >> But it seems to me that it should be easy enough to cater for all users,
> >> by having a setting in some /etc/NM.conf which will allow NM to start
> >> with a specific connection before anyone logs in
> >>
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>> >> But it seems to me that it should be easy enough to cater for all
>> >> users, by having a setting in some /etc/NM.conf which will allow NM to
>> >> start with a specific connection before anyone logs in
>> >> _if that is what one wants_,
>> >> or if not requires the
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 12:33 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Since this subject is bout Boinc and solved, shouldn't another thread be
started, at least about what your currently talking about so can be
followed from archives a little easier? Otherwise, who would know to
search for boinc when discus
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 15:03 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> >> Occasionally I try to access the internet from a WiFi "hotspot"
> >> but my experience in Ireland is that this is rarely as simple as it
> >> sounds.
> >> (Last time I tried in a pub here it turned out tha
53 matches
Mail list logo
