Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-11 Thread Niels Weber
2008/12/10 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-10 Thread Phil Meyer
Steve Snyder wrote: Hello. I'm about to wipe my x86_64 F8 installation in preparation for installing x86_64 F10. Since I'll be doing a clean install, I'm feeling adventurous. My plan is to go 64-bit only - no 32-bit binaries. Mind if I ask a few questions? 1. In prior versions of Fedora

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-10 Thread Niels Weber
2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All 32bit binary programs you want to

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-09 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. >> >> I think you mean "not all 32-bi

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-09 Thread Niels Weber
2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. > > I think you mean "not all 32-bit programs you want to run will work". All dynamically linked 32bit programs w

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-09 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. I think you mean "not all 32-bit programs you want to run will work". poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-09 Thread Niels Weber
2008/12/8 Steve Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1. In prior versions of Fedora there was no provision for doing a > 64-bit-only installation. You had to do a standard x86_64 install, > then erase all the i386/i686 RPMs. Is that still the case, or can I > opt at installation to only install x86_64 a

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-08 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:07:05 -0500 Steve Snyder wrote: > 2. What functionality will I be giving up to go 64-bit-only? In times > past the immediate answers to this was Flash Player and the Sun JVM > browser plug-in. Between the alpha 64-bit Flash Player (which I've > been successfully using f

Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?

2008-12-08 Thread Globe Trotter
Hi, I have this experience: I installed using a live F8 xfce spin cd and yum erased all 386/586/686 RPMs as you suggest. Thus, all my rpms are either x86_64 or noarch. Btw, I may be wrong on this, but I thought the F10 xfce spin cd (x86_64) did not have any ?86 RPMS. The only functionality I