Sawrub wrote:
> I don't see that al this a problem of torrent . As mentioned earlier
> [though i'm still confused] its some issue in the signing of the
> ISO. let me give a try creating the boot-able USB under windows.
No, the problem is that your download is not complete. You stated
earlier:
>
On 12/19/2009 09:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 19 December 2009, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 01:24 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Ktorrent hangs in there till somebody starts seeding what it needs, but I
have very very little experience with the others so
On Saturday 19 December 2009, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 01:24 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Ktorrent hangs in there till somebody starts seeding what it needs, but I
>> have very very little experience with the others so can't say what they
>> do.
>>
>> I have seen the se
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 01:24 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Ktorrent hangs in there till somebody starts seeding what it needs, but I
> have very very little experience with the others so can't say what they do.
>
> I have seen the seed count goto zero a couple of times, but when I got up the
> ne
On Friday 18 December 2009, Tim wrote:
>Tim:
>>> One of their prior posts said they got it using a torrent.
>
>Gene Heskett:
>> In which case they should restart the torrent. Most clients do a full
>> check and will re-pull anything that doesn't pass that 64kb blocks
>> crc.
>
>One thing that spra
Tim:
>> One of their prior posts said they got it using a torrent.
Gene Heskett:
> In which case they should restart the torrent. Most clients do a full
> check and will re-pull anything that doesn't pass that 64kb blocks
> crc.
One thing that sprang to my mind, would be whether the torrent hadn
2009/12/18 Gene Heskett :
> On Friday 18 December 2009, Tim wrote:
>>On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 11:53 -0800, suvayu ali wrote:
>>> This shows that your download is corrupted. That would explain all
>>> your other problems too. You need to download the iso again. If you
>>> are using direct download, I w
On Friday 18 December 2009, Tim wrote:
>On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 11:53 -0800, suvayu ali wrote:
>> This shows that your download is corrupted. That would explain all
>> your other problems too. You need to download the iso again. If you
>> are using direct download, I would suggest you to switch to to
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 11:53 -0800, suvayu ali wrote:
> This shows that your download is corrupted. That would explain all
> your other problems too. You need to download the iso again. If you
> are using direct download, I would suggest you to switch to torrent.
> While downloading torrents, your t
Hi Saurabh,
2009/12/18 Sawrub :
> On 12/18/2009 12:29 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> In addition to what Rick mentioned in another post, your command is
>> missing a flag. It should be,
>>
>> $ sha256sum -c *-CHECKSUM
>>
> Executed that also now as a part of other commands, but still in vain.
>
> [saw.
On 12/18/2009 12:29 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Thursday 17 December 2009 10:21 AM, Sawrub wrote:
On 12/17/2009 11:50 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Well, I'm not going to say that the above is not a problem as I saw
the same thing when using the same steps, however, nothing you have
done so far has anyt
On 12/18/2009 12:08 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/17/2009 10:20 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Sawrub
wrote:
I downloaded the Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.iso using the torrent client,
taking
the torrent from
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-12-x86_64-Live
Rick Stevens wrote:
> I know that and you know that, but there seems to be a lot of folk
> who haven't seen the page, forgotten about it or are simply
> confused.
Indeed. I figured mentioning it once again might help spread the
information. I realize it will remain a problem until F-13 when we
a
On 12/17/2009 11:02 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
This has been discussed before on the list.
The header indicates that the checksum file _itself_ was signed with
an SHA1 checksum. The checksums _inside_ the checksum file are the
SHA256 checksums of the various .iso images.
A
Rick Stevens wrote:
> This has been discussed before on the list.
>
> The header indicates that the checksum file _itself_ was signed with
> an SHA1 checksum. The checksums _inside_ the checksum file are the
> SHA256 checksums of the various .iso images.
And this is why we added the large red war
On Thursday 17 December 2009 10:21 AM, Sawrub wrote:
On 12/17/2009 11:50 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Well, I'm not going to say that the above is not a problem as I saw
the same thing when using the same steps, however, nothing you have
done so far has anything to do directly with the ISO. That does
On 12/17/2009 10:20 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Sawrub wrote:
I downloaded the Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.iso using the torrent client, taking
the torrent from
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.torrent.
But the creation of bootable USB was
On 12/17/2009 11:50 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Sawrub wrote:
I downloaded the Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.iso using the torrent client, taking
the torrent from
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.torrent.
But the creation of bootable USB
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Sawrub wrote:
> I downloaded the Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.iso using the torrent client, taking
> the torrent from
> http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.torrent.
> But the creation of bootable USB was not possible as the iso verification
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
