"Stanisław T. Findeisen" wrote:
> Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
Because packages need to be patched to integrate with the rest of the
distribution and the kernel is no exception.
Because Fedora is about shipping new technologies which sometimes have to be
backported to stable relea
Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
STF
===
http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/ . My PGP key fingerprint is:
9D25 3D89 75F1 DF1D F434 25D7 E87F A1B9 B80F 8062
===
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 19:35 -0800, john wendel wrote:
> Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
> > Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
> >
> > STF
> >
> > ===
> > http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/ . My PGP key fingerprint is:
"Stanisław T. Findeisen" wrote:
> Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
It’s a bit out of date, but Dave Jones produced
http://people.redhat.com/davej/patchlist-fc3.txt
describing all the patches that went into an FC3 kernel. The kernel has
changed a lot, but Fedora still patches for simila
On 02/24/2009 04:57 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
"Stanisław T. Findeisen" wrote:
Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
It’s a bit out of date, but Dave Jones produced
http://people.redhat.com/davej/patchlist-fc3.txt
describing all the patches that went into an FC3 kernel. The kern
2009/3/11 pushparaj muthu :
> Hi
>
> I want to compile kernel source (kernel-2.6.23.1-42.fc8.i686) in my Linux
> fedora
>
> if I compile existing kernel source code of my Linux fedora pc. It gives
> error “No rule to make target "missing -syscalls " stop
>
> Please do provide link to download kern
pushparaj muthu wrote:
> I want to compile kernel source (kernel-2.6.23.1-42.fc8.i686) in my Linux
> fedora
Why do you want to compile such an old kernel?
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 19:35 -0800, john wendel wrote:
Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
STF
===
http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/ . My PGP key fingerprint is
pushparaj muthu wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> When I try to do make install of kernel 2.6.23.1 source code after
> successfully completion of make command
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste
Jelena i Zoran wrote:
I have not been able to update the kernel on FC8 since
kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8.
All later versions stop loading at udev stage. I looked on the interned and
others seem so have similar issues. None of the suggestions I found on
the internet worked.
The message I get at the bo
Jelena i Zoran wrote:
I have not been able to update the kernel on FC8 since
kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8.
All later versions stop loading at udev stage. I looked on the interned and
others seem so have similar issues. None of the suggestions I found on
the internet worked.
The message I get at the bo
Robert C Smith wrote:
I have been using Windows for over 15 years but I'm new to Linux. I
recently installed Fedora 9 from a Live CD and allowed it to update
itself over the net. I am trying to find out my kernel version. On the
GNOME desktop from the top menu bar I select System --> About Thi
2008/8/21 Robert C Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have been using Windows for over 15 years but I'm new to Linux. I
> recently installed Fedora 9 from a Live CD and allowed it to update
> itself over the net. I am trying to find out my kernel version. On the
> GNOME desktop from the top menu bar
Hi!
- Original Message
> From: Robert C Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 12:25:57 AM
> Subject: Kernel Version
>
> I have been using Windows for over 15 years but I'm new to Linux. I
> recently installed Fedora 9 from a Live CD and
--- On Sun, 9/21/08, David McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: David McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: KERNEL HEADERS
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases"
> Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008, 7:40 AM
> I have been trying to install drivers for a Marvell nic and
> an Atheros
>
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to them and can't figure out what file
they are in in order to link to them.
Dave
Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sun, 9/21/08, David McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: David McCor
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
> Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
> that I have to install a link to them and can't figure out what file
> they are in in order to link to them.
Are the headers for the exact same kernel you are comp
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to them and can't figure out what file
they are in in order to link to them.
Are the headers for
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:15 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
>
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
> >> that I have to install a link to them and can't figure
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Agile Aspect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi - I have a Toshiba Satellite L355D-S7815 laptop with r8108E (10/100
> Mbits/sec)
> NIC which I'm trying to get working.
>
> There's appears to be a bug in the default kernel (2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64)
> for Fedora 9:
>
> Se
Kam Leo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Agile Aspect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi - I have a Toshiba Satellite L355D-S7815 laptop with r8108E (10/100
>> Mbits/sec)
>> NIC which I'm trying to get working.
>>
>> There's appears to be a bug in the default kernel (2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_6
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:15 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to th
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:18 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
> I just noticed that you are using the ath5k driver on your system.
> That
> is what I am tring to get working on my Tosiba laptop. How did you
> insall it.
I didn't. It came with the system.
> I am using FC09 is that what you are usin
William Biggs wrote:
where and how do I download kernel-PAE for fedora 9 32 bit and how do I
install it ?
yum install kernel-PAE
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Com
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 09:00:27PM -0400, William Biggs wrote:
> where and how do I download kernel-PAE for fedora 9 32 bit and how do I
> install it ?
On an internet-connected system, you can just use System >
Administration > Add/Remove Software, or at a command prompt try:
$ su -c 'yum instal
2008/9/21 Antonio Olivares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --- On Sun, 9/21/08, David McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: David McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: KERNEL HEADERS
>> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases"
>> Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008, 7:40 AM
>> I have been trying
I have gotten all the files I needed to compile the software. I can now
use the Marvell ethernet, however when I try to connect with the Atheros
wifi it tries to connect but then comes back with the error message
network disconnected. Any one have an idea.
I tried upgrading via yum to get the
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run for a few seconds:
$ vmstat 1
look at system|in = interrupts per
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run for a few seconds:
$ vmstat 1
look at system|in = interrupts per
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:49 -0500, Steve West wrote:
> > Steve West wrote:
> >> I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
> >> thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
> > Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
> > http://kerneltrap.org/node/46
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:49 -0500, Steve West wrote:
> > Steve West wrote:
> >> I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
> >> thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
> > Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
> > http://kerneltrap.org/node/46
> Steve West wrote:
>> I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
>> thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
> Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
>
> run for a few seconds:
> $ vmstat 1
>
> look at system|i
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 14:45 -0500, Steve West wrote:
> >> > Steve West wrote:
> >> >> I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
> >> >> thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
> >> > Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
> >> > http://kernelt
>> > Steve West wrote:
>> >> I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
>> >> thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
>> > Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
>> > http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
>> >
>> > run for a few seconds:
>> > $ vmsta
David Timms wrote:
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run for a few seconds:
$ vmstat 1
look at system
On 17Nov2008 15:19, Steve West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The ticks matter when the threads are competing for cpu, but it looks
>> like in your case they'll mostly be waiting for socket calls (during
>> which the schedular will hand off to another thread anyway), so
>> increasing the timeslice f
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 07:51 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Do you really expect all 1000 to be CPU bound? Most machines would give
> terrible response no matter the tick rate.
>
> As I recall, the tick rate only matters when the threads are, as Patrick
> said, _competing_ for CPU. Most TCP handl
The ticks matter when the threads are competing for cpu, but it looks
like in your case they'll mostly be waiting for socket calls (during
which the schedular will hand off to another thread anyway), so
increasing the timeslice frequency is probably not going to make a
difference. Hard to know wit
On 17Nov2008 21:24, Wayne Feick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| If you're trying to service 1000's of sockets, you should at least take
| a look at select(2)
Select() should be replaced with epoll() on modern linux. Select() has
O(n) performance with the number of filedescriptors (because the bitmap
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 14:45 -0500, Steve West wrote:
> >> > Steve West wrote:
> >> >> I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
> >> >> thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
> >> > Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
> >> > http://kernelt
Steve West wrote:
>> > Steve West wrote:
>> >> I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
>> >> thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
>> > Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
>> > http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
>> >
>> > run for a few se
yes
download 2.6.30 in koji and install in your FC11
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Is it possible to build Kernel 2.6.30 for Fedora 11 using the same
> configuration parameters used by Fedora 11?.
>
> FC
>
--
Ita
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Itamar Reis
Peixoto wrote:
> yes
>
> download 2.6.30 in koji and install in your FC11
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
Interesting that the "koji" project page lacks two important links:
1. What is Koji?
2. How does it work?
FC
--
fedora-list mailing li
koji is the fedora build system
there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
> 1. What is Koji?
> 2. How does it work?
>
> FC
>
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/msn: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55 34 3221 8599
--
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Itamar Reis
Peixoto wrote:
> koji is the fedora build system
used by whom? public? internal? how does it work?
> there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
But the $1M dollar question is ... is there a way to make it use the
same kernel spec file as, say 2.6.29 used i
yes, it's alrealy the same spec.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Itamar Reis
> Peixoto wrote:
>> koji is the fedora build system
>
> used by whom? public? internal? how does it work?
>
>> there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
>
> But the
В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 00:44 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto пишет:
> koji is the fedora build system
>
> there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
I am using F10. Would it be safe for me to install
kernel-2.6.29.5-84.fc10 from koji? Or even kernel-2.6.30-6.fc12 keeping
in mind I'm no tester? :-)
--
Misha S
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:44:17 +0900, Misha wrote:
> В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 00:44 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto пишет:
> > koji is the fedora build system
> >
> > there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
>
> I am using F10. Would it be safe for me to install
> kernel-2.6.29.5-84.fc10 from koji? Or even kern
В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 11:41 +0200, Michael Schwendt пишет:
> The F10 kernel build you refer to is pending as a future test-update:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.29.5-84.fc10,hal-0.5.12-15.20081027git.fc10
OK, I'll better wait. :) Thank you.
--
Misha Shnurapet
°v° I ♥ L
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:44:17 +0900, Misha wrote:
В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 00:44 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto пишет:
koji is the fedora build system
there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
I am using F10. Would it be safe for me to install
kernel-2.6.29.5-84.fc10 from koji? Or e
On 06/18/2009 03:14 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:44:17 +0900, Misha wrote:
В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 00:44 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto пишет:
koji is the fedora build system
there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
I am using F10. Would it be safe for me to i
john wendel wrote:
On 06/18/2009 03:14 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:44:17 +0900, Misha wrote:
В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 00:44 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto пишет:
koji is the fedora build system
there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
I am using F10. Would it
--- On Fri, 6/19/09, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> From: Bill Davidsen
> Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Friday, June 19, 2009, 5:44 AM
> john wendel wrote:
> > On 06/18/2009 03:14 PM,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:44:52 -0400
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I'm going to assume that question is for the O.P. and pass on it.
> Fedora kernels are not kernel.org kernels, there are patches applied,
> so there is at least some justification for starting with a Fedora
> source. I wish there was a too
On 06/19/2009 06:10 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
[snip]
BTW,
If kernel.org releases 2.6.30.1, Are there any delta *.tar.gz's that one can
download instead of downloading
the full kernel source again to update to 2.6.30.1? I have been
yearning to ask this question, but never had the
courage o
--- On Fri, 6/19/09, stan wrote:
> From: stan
> Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Friday, June 19, 2009, 7:20 AM
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:44:52 -0400
> Bill Davidsen
> wrote:
>
> > I'm going to assume that question is for th
john wendel wrote:
On 06/19/2009 06:10 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
[snip]
BTW,
If kernel.org releases 2.6.30.1, Are there any delta *.tar.gz's that
one can download instead of downloading
the full kernel source again to update to 2.6.30.1? I have been
yearning to ask this question, but nev
On 06/19/2009 11:17 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
john wendel wrote:
On 06/19/2009 06:10 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
[snip]
BTW,
If kernel.org releases 2.6.30.1, Are there any delta *.tar.gz's that
one can download instead of downloading
the full kernel source again to update to 2.6.30.1? I have
stan wrote:
> Second this. That would be great. I dropped the size by 90% for a
> time by eliminating unneeded functionality, then some change came along
> that made my config file unstable, and I couldn't get back. This seems
> to be a problem generally, that there is a lot of dependency betwee
> >>> If kernel.org releases 2.6.30.1, Are there any
> delta *.tar.gz's that
> >>> one can download instead of downloading
> >> the full kernel source again to update to
> 2.6.30.1? I have been
> >> yearning to ask this question, but never had the
> >> courage or the determination to do so. I gene
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.30.1.bz2
>
> Patch is out for 2.6.30.1, how exactly do I do it. I
> run
> patch -P1 < patch-2.6.30.1.bz2 in /linux-2.6.30
> directory where the 2.6.30 source was?
> Do I extract the patch?
> This is where I need more guidance as I have no
--- On Fri, 7/3/09, Mail Lists wrote:
> From: Mail Lists
> Subject: kernel 2.6.30.1
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2009, 7:47 AM
>
> 2.6.30.1 is the recommended stable kernel by
> upstream - are there
> plans to make th
> I will come back in about an 1 hour or 2 and post if I have
> 2.6.30.1 kernel or not. Thanks for the help and
> encouragement :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio
>
>
>
>
> --
To add closure to this thread, Thank you Mr. John Wendel, your instructions
worked and I am now running 2.6.31 o
Antonio Olivares wrote:
If kernel.org releases 2.6.30.1, Are there any
delta *.tar.gz's that
one can download instead of downloading
the full kernel source again to update to
2.6.30.1? I have been
yearning to ask this question, but never had the
courage or the determination to do so. I gener
Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/3/09, Mail Lists wrote:
From: Mail Lists
Subject: kernel 2.6.30.1
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
Date: Friday, July 3, 2009, 7:47 AM
2.6.30.1 is the recommended stable kernel by
upstream - are there
plans to
> > I hear you and I am applying the patch from 2.6.30 to
> 2.6.30.1 as of now.
> > I know your frustrations, but Fedora is staying a bit
> behind as of now
> > because apparently many things were changed from
> 2.6.29 to 2.6.30?
> >
> I think that sums it up, with any new release there will be
>
> drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_init.c:1250: confused by earlier
> errors, bailing out
> The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or
> OS problem.
> make[3]: *** [drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_init.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [drivers/scsi/qla4xxx] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [drivers/scsi] Error 2
2010/1/9 Luca :
> Hi all,
> I created a kernel module which can be passed some command line arguments
> (I tried that with insmod and it works).
>
> Now I would like, when I start the kernel with grub, to have this module
> loaded at boot time so I can pass, at boot time, a kernel boot option to i
paul s wrote:
> how do you build the kernel-firmware rpm?
You need to build the noarch parts. Do a:
rpmbuild --target=noarch --rebuild kernel-src.rpm
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
G
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:23:34 -0700
Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oct 28 08:53:28 myhost kernel: martian source 255.255.255.255 from
> what do they mean?
A "martian source" is an invalid IP address. In your case, 255.255.255.255 is
the IP address. It's impossible for that to be a valid
Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:23:34 -0700
Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oct 28 08:53:28 myhost kernel: martian source 255.255.255.255 from
what do they mean?
A "martian source" is an invalid IP address. In your case, 255.255.255.255 is
the IP address. It'
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Seann Clark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>. I see this a lot on my firewall, but that is because
> both my ISP and myself use a 10.x.x.x private IP range that overlaps. They
> use it for the management of the cable modems, and I use it for more
> traditional uses.
Frank Cox wrote:
> A "martian source" is an invalid IP address. In your case, 255.255.255.255 is
> the IP address. It's impossible for that to be a valid address, not least
> because *.*.*.255 is a broadcast address.
Usually. If you’re using anything larger than a Class C (= /24 = netmask
of 255
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:46 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
> I put this question up yesterday, but didnt get any responses.
> Im trying again, as this stopping me from running on f9.
F9 already has a 2.6.27 kernel. Are you sure you need to recompile?
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redha
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:46 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
> > I put this question up yesterday, but didnt get any responses.
> > Im trying again, as this stopping me from running on f9.
>
> F9 already has a 2.6.27 kernel. Are you sure you need to recompile?
>
Yes, I need to add the PPS stuff, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pushparaj muthu a écrit :
" No rule to make target "missing -syscalls " stop
>
> Please do provide link to download kernel-2.6.23 tar file .( Not rpm
> package)
>
>
> Raj
>
>
fc8 is end of life however the vanilla kernel source with historica
Thierry wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pushparaj muthu a écrit :
" No rule to make target "missing -syscalls " stop
Please do provide link to download kernel-2.6.23 tar file .( Not rpm
package)
You can get Fedora RPMs using yum, and kernel.org unpatched kernels at
ke
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Thierry wrote:
pushparaj muthu a écrit :
" No rule to make target "missing -syscalls " stop
Please do provide link to download kernel-2.6.23 tar file .( Not rpm
package)
You can get Fedora RPMs using yum, and kernel.org unpatched kernels at
kernel.org. Be *very* awa
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for kernel
> 2.6.29-rc8-git and it would unpack due to "MD5 errors" in the install.
> Don't know what that's all about,
Rawhide has switched to using SHA256 instead of MD5 everywhere including
RPM. Details in the
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for kernel
2.6.29-rc8-git and it would unpack due to "MD5 errors" in the install.
Don't know what that's all about,
Rawhide has switched to using SHA256 instead of MD5 everywhere including
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>
>>> And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for kernel
>>> 2.6.29-rc8-git and it would unpack due to "MD5 errors" in the install.
>>> Don't know what that's all about,
>>
>> Rawhide has switched to using SH
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for kernel
2.6.29-rc8-git and it would unpack due to "MD5 errors" in the install.
Don't know what that's all about,
Rawhide has switched to using
On 3/26/2009 12:47 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for kernel
> 2.6.29-rc8-git and it would unpack due to "MD5 errors" in the install.
David wrote:
On 3/26/2009 12:47 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for kernel
2.6.29-rc8-git and it would unpack due to "MD5 errors" in the install.
Don't
David wrote:
On 3/26/2009 12:47 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for kernel
2.6.29-rc8-git and it would unpack due
psmith wrote:
David wrote:
On 3/26/2009 12:47 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
And as a side note, I just pulled a source rpm off rawhide, for
kernel
2.6.29-rc8-git and it would
Konstantin Svist wrote:
> So what's wrong with this picture? Is it different kind of modesetting?
> Is F10 using a pre-release version of it? Something else?
Fedora 10 is using a backported patch for it. Support is only included for
some Radeon hardware, widespread support is coming in Fedora 11 (
2009/11/9 Andrew Jamison
> Is there an easy way to see the changes between Fedora kernel versions
> so we can see what has been altered/added when we update a kernel?
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
Thanks this should work for what i need
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 16:59 +0100, Pikachu_2014 wrote:
>
>
> 2009/11/9 Andrew Jamison
> Is there an easy way to see the changes between Fedora kernel
> versions
> so we can see what has been altered/added when we update a
>
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 07:45 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> On two separate machines (both running Fedora 9) VLC fails when trying
> to play DVDs, complaining of kernel errors trying to read a particular
> sector (and just repeats - it is very hard to actually stop - in one
> case i had to reboot
> "Patrick" == Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 07:45 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>> On two separate machines (both running Fedora 9) VLC fails when
>> trying to play DVDs, complaining of kernel errors trying to
>> read a particu
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 21:06:29 -0500,
Dave Feustel wrote:
> Will f9 be upgraded to the 2.6.28 kernel?
There are already f9 (and f10) versions of 2.6.28 in koji.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:44:03 Jim wrote:
> FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start,
> esc, tab, What ??
Here's what I do:
1) edit /boot/grub/grub.conf
change "timeout=0" to "timeout=20"
Comment out the "hiddenmenu" line
2) save the above changes
reboot - now yo
Kevin Kempter wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:44:03 Jim wrote:
FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start,
esc, tab, What ??
Here's what I do:
1) edit /boot/grub/grub.conf
change "timeout=0" to "timeout=20"
Comment out the "hiddenmenu" line
2) save the a
2009/1/27 Jim :
> Kevin Kempter wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:44:03 Jim wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start,
>>> esc, tab, What ??
>>>
>>
>> Here's what I do:
>>
>>
>> 1) edit /boot/grub/grub.conf
>> change "timeout=0" to "timeout=20"
>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Jim wrote:
> FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start, esc,
> tab, What ??
I usually just hold down a Ctrl key during boot to see the menu.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg finge
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 11:09 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Kernel 217.2.3 is working OK for me. I can live without 217.2.8,
> except that I am worried that the next kernel update will delete it
> and I might be left with zero working kernels.
Change the configuration in yum.conf to keep more than t
> From: linuxguy...@gmail.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:09:19 -0600
> Subject: kernel 217.2.8 won't boot.
>
> Kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.i586 works fine on my laptop, but 217.2.8
> won't boot at all. It seems to run throug
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 03:35 +0930, Tim wrote:
> Change the configuration in yum.conf to keep more than two kernels.
> Two's not enough for exactly the reason that you're concerned with.
>
> e.g. installonly_limit=6
Thanks for the tip. I made this change.
LG
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora
Markus Kesaromous wrote:
From: linuxguy...@gmail.com
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:09:19 -0600
Subject: kernel 217.2.8 won't boot.
Kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.i586 works fine on my laptop, but 217.2.8
won't boot at all. It seems
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
