On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, John Horne wrote:
[Apologies for cross-posting from the opensuse list]
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could tell me why there is a difference in
the reported inode number of a file from the 'ls' command, and from the
'rpm' command. For example, using the /usr/bin/wget
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 20:18 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, John Horne wrote:
[Apologies for cross-posting from the opensuse list]
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could tell me why there is a difference in
the reported inode number of a file from the 'ls' command,
[Apologies for cross-posting from the opensuse list]
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could tell me why there is a difference in
the reported inode number of a file from the 'ls' command, and from the
'rpm' command. For example, using the /usr/bin/wget file, I get:
ls -i /usr/bin/wget
John Horne john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk writes:
I realise that prelinking will cause the inode number to change, but
even without prelinking the numbers reported are not the same.
All the other inodes for the supporting txt files also differ, so it
is not a case of just the executable's inode
