On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 14:50 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 29.11.2008 19:08, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 18:11 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 29.11.2008 17:52, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:53 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Some of you may know this, but I didn't and thus I'll share what I
> learned.
>
> The rpmfusion nvidia driver needs a special xorg.conf file. It might
> not operate properly with a file that previously operated properly
> with say a livna sourced driver.
I posted this last
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:37:43 -0500
Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I keep hearing rumors that Intel might make a PCI-E video card
> someday. I wish they would, I'd switch to one just to support their
> open source driver.
For the past several years I've always made sure that any computer
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:17:12 -0700
"Christopher A. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kind of ironic that the "slower" Intel controller works better, with a
> default "out of the box" setup than the ATI controller, ain't it. :)
Nah, that's not ironic, that's just Intel always having had
suppo
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 00:05 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:52:28 -0700
> "Christopher A. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wow... A simple "No, it's not working on F10 yet because, among other
> > things, the only known way to get it to work is to downgrade libdrm -
> >
Just a quick update to say that the developer chatter on the bugzilla
for this matter is pretty interesting. They are taking this matter to
heart.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman
On 29.11.2008 19:08, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 18:11 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.11.2008 17:52, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:53 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Perhaps it woul
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:52:28 -0700
"Christopher A. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow... A simple "No, it's not working on F10 yet because, among other
> things, the only known way to get it to work is to downgrade libdrm -
> which we think is a _really_ bad idea!" would have done just fin
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:31:43 -0700
"Christopher A. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... Could be useful indeed. The only question here is if we can both
> modify the ATI proprietary code as needed with it AND then legally
> distribute the modified version via RPMFusion.
Or maybe the lawy
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:57 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:08:04 -0700
> "Christopher A. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (Sheesh! I can't believe developers still like to
> > hard code directory paths when there's no reason to!!!) would be to use
> > bad packaging pr
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:08:04 -0700
"Christopher A. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Sheesh! I can't believe developers still like to
> hard code directory paths when there's no reason to!!!) would be to use
> bad packaging practice.
Hey, if it will help anyone I have a handy program I've o
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 18:11 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 29.11.2008 17:52, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:53 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> >>>
> > Wow... A simple "No, it's not working on F10 yet beca
On 29.11.2008 17:52, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:53 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Come to think of it, the fglrx drivers are also missing. ATI/AMD just
released a new version of these on 11-18 as well.
If you get
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:53 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> >
> > Come to think of it, the fglrx drivers are also missing. ATI/AMD just
> > released a new version of these on 11-18 as well.
>
> If you get them to work in a proper way(¹) let
On 28.11.2008 18:29, Linuxguy123 wrote:
Some of you may know this, but I didn't and thus I'll share what I
learned.
The rpmfusion nvidia driver needs a special xorg.conf file. It might
not operate properly with a file that previously operated properly with
say a livna sourced driver.
Specifi
On 28.11.2008 23:17, Jim wrote:
> [...]
Rpmfusion is also missing the xine package.
You seems to be quite sure with that. But what's this then:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/10/Everything/i386/os/repoview/xine.html
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/10/Eve
On 29.11.2008 00:16, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
>
Come to think of it, the fglrx drivers are also missing. ATI/AMD just
released a new version of these on 11-18 as well.
If you get them to work in a proper way(¹) let the RPM Fusion packagers
know via http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org. But they
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 17:17 -0500, Jim wrote:
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > Right now I am unsure if the xorg or nvidia xorg.conf configuration
> > tools will put both these lines in the xorg.conf file. I doubt they do,
> > actually.
> >
> > You can read more about this issue here:
> > https://bugzill
Linuxguy123 wrote:
Some of you may know this, but I didn't and thus I'll share what I
learned.
The rpmfusion nvidia driver needs a special xorg.conf file. It might
not operate properly with a file that previously operated properly with
say a livna sourced driver.
Specifically, it needs this
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 14:51 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:29:35 -0500
> Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Right now I am unsure if the xorg or nvidia xorg.conf configuration
> > tools will put both these lines in the xorg.conf file. I doubt they do,
> > actually.
>
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:29:35 -0500
Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now I am unsure if the xorg or nvidia xorg.conf configuration
> tools will put both these lines in the xorg.conf file. I doubt they do,
> actually.
I thought that was among the things the livna-config-display scrip
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 12:29 -0500, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> The rpmfusion nvidia driver needs a special xorg.conf file. It might
> not operate properly with a file that previously operated properly with
> say a livna sourced driver.
>
> Specifically, it needs this to be present:
>
> Section "Files
Some of you may know this, but I didn't and thus I'll share what I
learned.
The rpmfusion nvidia driver needs a special xorg.conf file. It might
not operate properly with a file that previously operated properly with
say a livna sourced driver.
Specifically, it needs this to be present:
Sectio
23 matches
Mail list logo
