Sometimes I like to experiment with the latest version of some
component. And sometimes I'm shocked when I try to do it:
# yum --enablerepo=rawhide update subversion
Transaction Summary
=
Install 27 Package(s)
Update 96 Package(
o Rhythmbox. I tried
to play one of the stations and got another popup advising me that I was
missing a particular codec and would I like it to try to find it for me.
Feeling brave I agreed. That's when I had my WOW moment.
It went exploring and installed some files from a "bad&qu
Alan Evans gmail.com> writes:
> Yikes. Won't be casually trying *that* today.
That's exactly why one should *never* --enablerepo=rawhide (except for a
complete and wholesale update to Rawhide). Not only do Rawhide packages depend
on other Rawhide packages, but those in turn force the packages d
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Kevin Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's exactly why one should *never* --enablerepo=rawhide (except for a
> complete and wholesale update to Rawhide).
Basically, I'd agree. But for some limited cases, I've found it useful.
It's just that in this case, I di
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Alan Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Alan Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Wow.
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008, 5:42 PM
> On Tue, Oct 7,
Alan Evans gmail.com> writes:
> It's just that in this case, I didn't expect updating subversion to
> pull in a new version of openoffice! And sendmail???
If packages A and B both depend on library L and if Rawhide has a newer version
of L with a different soname major version (the number which
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Alan Evans gmail.com> writes:
It's just that in this case, I didn't expect updating subversion to
pull in a new version of openoffice! And sendmail???
If packages A and B both depend on library L and if Rawhide has a newer version
of L with a different
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Alan Evans gmail.com> writes:
It's just that in this case, I didn't expect updating subversion to
pull in a new version of openoffice! And sendmail???
If packages A and B both depend on library L and if Rawhide has a newer version
of L with a different soname major versio
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:38:43PM -0700, john wendel wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> If packages A and B both depend on library L and if Rawhide has a newer
>> version of L with a different soname major version (the number which
>> indicates which versions of a library are binary-compatible w
and once I find a keeper I add it to Rhythmbox. I tried
to play one of the stations and got another popup advising me that I was
missing a particular codec and would I like it to try to find it for me.
Feeling brave I agreed. That's when I had my WOW moment.
It went exploring and installed
> Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run
> audacious,
> vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them. Of
> course, I can't
> set the volume of each individually, but why would I want
> to do this in
> the first place.
>
> Most recent (last 10 years) sound hardware h
On 07/31/2009 08:46 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run
audacious,
vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them. Of
course, I can't
set the volume of each individually, but why would I want
to do this in
the first place.
Most recent (las
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:32 -0700, john wendel wrote:
> Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run audacious,
> vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them.
Lucky you to have hardware that supports than, but not everybody does.
And in things like laptops, you don't have m
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:32 -0700, john wendel wrote:
>> Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run audacious,
>> vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them.
>> Of course, I can't set the volume of each individually, but why would
>> I want to do this in the first place.
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:01 -0400, Mike Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:32 -0700, john wendel wrote:
> >> Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run audacious,
> >> vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them.
> >> Of course, I can't set the volume of each indi
On 02/08/09 15:36, Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:01 -0400, Mike Williams wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:32 -0700, john wendel wrote:
Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run audacious,
vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them.
Of cou
john wendel wrote:
On 07/31/2009 08:46 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run
audacious,
vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them. Of
course, I can't
set the volume of each individually, but why would I want
to do this in
the first plac
Antonio Olivares wrote:
Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run
audacious,
vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them. Of
course, I can't
set the volume of each individually, but why would I want
to do this in
the first place.
Most recent (last 10 years) sound ha
On 02/08/2009, at 08:01, Mike Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:32 -0700, john wendel wrote:
Uh, I don't use pulseaudio at all, just alsa, and I can run
audacious,
vlc and mplayer simultaneously and hear all of them.
Of course, I can't set the volume of each individually, but why
w
19 matches
Mail list logo
