Re: fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-29 Thread Bill Davidsen
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: Stuart Sears wrote: Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: The Fedora installer has insisted on requiring four drives for raid-10 install, and then not using raid-10, but rather raid-1+0 which is *NOT* the same thing.

Re: fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-29 Thread Bill Davidsen
Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Saturday 27 September 2008 09:32:27 pm Bill Davidsen wrote: The Fedora installer has insisted on requiring four drives for raid-10 install, and then not using raid-10, but rather raid-1+0 which is *NOT* the same thing. Any hope that this could be fixed in fc10, as it is

Re: fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-29 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Bill Davidsen wrote: The problem is that there is a raid10 entry in the raid part of the installer. And since this is being done by the software raid, it's confusing to have raid10 mean one thing to the installer and another in the man pages and to the man who maintains the code. I would like

Re: fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-28 Thread Stuart Sears
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: The Fedora installer has insisted on requiring four drives for raid-10 install, and then not using raid-10, but rather raid-1+0 which is *NOT* the same thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#Nested_levels ah, but...

Re: fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-28 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday 27 September 2008 09:32:27 pm Bill Davidsen wrote: The Fedora installer has insisted on requiring four drives for raid-10 install, and then not using raid-10, but rather raid-1+0 which is *NOT* the same thing. Any hope that this could be fixed in fc10, as it is a real PITA to fight

Re: fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-28 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Stuart Sears wrote: Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: The Fedora installer has insisted on requiring four drives for raid-10 install, and then not using raid-10, but rather raid-1+0 which is *NOT* the same thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#Nested_levels ah, but...

fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-27 Thread Bill Davidsen
The Fedora installer has insisted on requiring four drives for raid-10 install, and then not using raid-10, but rather raid-1+0 which is *NOT* the same thing. Any hope that this could be fixed in fc10, as it is a real PITA to fight a way around it and get a proper raid configured. This is a

Re: fc10 and raid-10

2008-09-27 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Bill Davidsen wrote: The Fedora installer has insisted on requiring four drives for raid-10 install, and then not using raid-10, but rather raid-1+0 which is *NOT* the same thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#Nested_levels -Jeroen -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To