Quoting Stuart :
At which point does it say that?
Do you get as far as the grub menu?
Partition type 0x5 is an 'Extended' partition. (/dev/sda4 or
equivalent, usually) - this suggests to me that your grub.conf is
incorrect, probably containing a line similar to
root (hd0,3)
But you can see thi
Quoting Stuart :
[snip]
okay, how many are there? And which one do you want to boot from?
According to the installer, it's going to write the boot info to
/dev/sda. Boot is /dev/sdb1.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
Quoting Stuart :
At which point does it say that?
Do you get as far as the grub menu?
Yes. It gets that far, and when I select that, it gives me the error.
Even if I go as far as editing it to try and get into single mode.
Partition type 0x5 is an 'Extended' partition. (/dev/sda4 or
equivale
'm using X86_64 where before I was using i386, but that shouldn't
matter, should it?
nope
All data drives are IDE/PATA, but I'm installing off a SATA DVD ROM.
okay, how many are there? And which one do you want to boot from?
HELP!!! I need to get this up and running as it&#
install over the old version (except for "/home" and a storage
partition.)
I'm using X86_64 where before I was using i386, but that shouldn't
matter, should it?
All data drives are IDE/PATA, but I'm installing off a SATA DVD ROM.
HELP!!! I need to get this up and ru
On 12/29/2008 01:56 PM, Don Raikes wrote:
Hi all,
I have fedora 10 installed on my gateway desktop.
It has been running fine for several weeks.
Over the weekend, I had ot reboot the system, and when the grub boot menu
appears, the system just locks up.
I have no keyboard control, and cannot g
Hi all,
I have fedora 10 installed on my gateway desktop.
It has been running fine for several weeks.
Over the weekend, I had ot reboot the system, and when the grub boot menu
appears, the system just locks up.
I have no keyboard control, and cannot get the system to proceed at all.
There is o
Simon Slater wrote:
> An urgent but not life-or-death question. I went to
> http://rolexsydneyhobart.com/yacht_tracker.asp?key=522 to check the race
> progress but the yacht tracker downloaded but doesn't run. Right
> clicking shows it is using gnash. Where do I start looking?
Right now that si
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 00:52 -0600, David Orman wrote:
> Gave it a shot, like the others mentioned - the site is extremely slow
> in
> responding. Doesn't seem to be network related, looks like server load
> issues.
>
> That said, it didn't work for me using Gnash on a Fedora 8 kick I
> installed
Gave it a shot, like the others mentioned - the site is extremely slow in
responding. Doesn't seem to be network related, looks like server load
issues.
That said, it didn't work for me using Gnash on a Fedora 8 kick I installed
to test it for you, but it does work on Fedora 10 x64 beta flash plug
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 08:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Simon Slater wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 20:18 +1100, Simon Slater wrote:
> >
> >>Merry Christmas All.
> >>
> >>An urgent but not life-or-death question. I went to
> >> http://rolexsydneyhobart.com/yacht_tracker.asp?ke
Simon Slater wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 20:18 +1100, Simon Slater wrote:
>
>> Merry Christmas All.
>>
>> An urgent but not life-or-death question. I went to
>> http://rolexsydneyhobart.com/yacht_tracker.asp?key=522 to check the race
>> progress but the yacht tracker downlo
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 20:18 +1100, Simon Slater wrote:
> Merry Christmas All.
>
> An urgent but not life-or-death question. I went to
> http://rolexsydneyhobart.com/yacht_tracker.asp?key=522 to check the race
> progress but the yacht tracker downloaded but doesn't run. Right
Merry Christmas All.
An urgent but not life-or-death question. I went to
http://rolexsydneyhobart.com/yacht_tracker.asp?key=522 to check the race
progress but the yacht tracker downloaded but doesn't run. Right
clicking shows it is using gnash. Where do I start looking?
use-emulator - since I don't
really need it either - maybe later.
I'm happy as a clam now ;)
Thanks for all the help!
Dan
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:05:20 -0800, Dan wrote:
I get this error from Yum...
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy in place
prevents this send
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:05:20 -0800, Dan wrote:
>
> I get this error from Yum...
>
> ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
> :1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
> org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy in place
> prevents this sender from sending
Todd Denniston wrote:
N. James Bridge wrote, On 12/17/2008 01:55 PM:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:40 -0800, Dan Thurman wrote:
I get this error from Yum...
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDeni
I get this error from Yum...
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy in place
prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, see
message bus configuratio
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Marc Ferguson wrote:
> Funny thing though, if YUM is broken, will a "YUM update {package}" work?
the dbus update last week should not have affected basic yum
functionality. The post error is most likely being emitted by the
refresh-packagekit yum plugin and not
N. James Bridge wrote, On 12/17/2008 01:55 PM:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:40 -0800, Dan Thurman wrote:
I get this error from Yum...
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy i
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM, N. James Bridge wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:40 -0800, Dan Thurman wrote:
> > I get this error from Yum...
> >
> > ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
> > :1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
> > org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Acces
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:40 -0800, Dan Thurman wrote:
> I get this error from Yum...
>
> ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
> :1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
> org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy in place
> prevents this sender from send
I get this error from Yum...
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy in place
prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, see
message bus configuratio
I get this error from Yum...
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.31:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy in place
prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, see
message bus configuratio
ow_bug.cgi?id=13 takes so long
IOW: Not everything is as easy as it might look like.
BTW - I have been trying to get into the RPMFusion Wiki to help with a
few things documentation-wise.
Just FYI, Steward (one of the amd and nvidia graphics driver
maintainers) did some work a f
s of that directory conflic). That
> are more reasons why
>
> * it not a freebie / it's not that easy to grab the bits from the
> livna package
>
> * https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 takes so long
>
> IOW: Not everything is as easy as it might look like.
BTW -
tested patches.
After I posted my message I rechecked, found the new main web page,
and the neutered release rpm. Bummer. I'm beginning to think this
merger is a shotgun wedding.
Then consider to help to make it better to suit your needs.
BTW, quoting
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmf
and apt; I
> guess the livna people will readd it if somebody sends tested patches.
>
After I posted my message I rechecked, found the new main web page,
and the neutered release rpm. Bummer. I'm beginning to think this
merger is a shotgun wedding.
>> P.S. I would have submitt
On 17.12.2008 08:21, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 17.12.2008 07:53, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
wrote:
Here's a freebie: Borrow from Livna's install script. It already has
provisions for smart and apt.
Guess what: it's not free -- packaging it/adding it
RPM
Fusion website layout overwhelmed me.
Wanna help? The wiki afaics really needs a lot of improvements. But each
day only has 24 hours and I right now put other things higher on my todo
list.
It's too modern, too much low
contrast light blue on white, and required a login!
Without
r it and do something do fix
> it (which often, but not always works and sometimes takes a long time until
> you get the outcome)
>
> (2) do it yourself/help other with it
>
> For smart complaining and waiting might be enough, because people work on
> is; but if you help it might
ity project open to everyone. Hence if you want
that project to do something you can either
(1) complain and hope that the right people hear it and do something do
fix it (which often, but not always works and sometimes takes a long
time until you get the outcome)
(2) do it yourself/help other w
RGH wrote:
I know vaguely how to do this, but can't find the right file: What do I
need to change so that the permissions on /dev/fw* aren't just root and
ordinary users can access e.g. the video camera? Same question for
/dev/video*.
Cheers,
rh
Hi,
You could look /etc/udev/rules.d and make t
I know vaguely how to do this, but can't find the right file: What do I
need to change so that the permissions on /dev/fw* aren't just root and
ordinary users can access e.g. the video camera? Same question for
/dev/video*.
Cheers,
rh
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubsc
你好，我用的电脑是Toshiba Satellite m215 ，
显卡是ATI Mobility Radeon HD2400,在用fedora 10时，显卡驱动的问题还是没能解决，
请求帮助。--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 02:50:51 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Horsley) wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 23:44:19 -0800 (PST)
> "Dean S. Messing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The FAQ entry also contains a pointer to _this bug_:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459756
>
> Yea, and i
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 23:48:32 -0800 (PST) "Dean S. Messing"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I forgot to say THANK YOU MAX! for providing the clue
> to my problem with using the rpmfusion repos.
Hey, you're welcome. :-) No problem.
-Max
--
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Competent, F
Deepak Shrestha wrote:
> Dean Messing wrote:
>> ONBOOT=no
>By the way isn't that ONBOOT should be set to "yes"?
>From what I've read, I don't think so if Network Manager is running.
> > I think NetworkManager
> > is "taking care of things" for me. This is my first
> > experience with NM. (I usu
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Md. Nazmul Hamid Reza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
> i am running fedora 9 shulphur. i could not install any software in it.
> when i try to install then it shows 'You don't have the necessary privileges
> to install local packages&#
gt; privileges to install local packages'.
> what can i do?
> plz help me
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicat
the baserul (i.e. remove the "#"
character), and disable the mirrorlist (i.e place a "#" at beginning
of line).
See also:
http://rpmfusion.org/FAQ
[...] I did that already (by hand) before I wrote
to the list; didn't help.
[...]
> ONBOOT=no
By the way isn't that ONBOOT should be set to "yes"?
> I think NetworkManager
> is "taking care of things" for me. This is my first
> experience with NM. (I usually hand edit
> ifcfg-eth0 on mh other systems.)
>
> Right after installation I was able to yum update w/o
> a proble
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 23:44:19 -0800 (PST)
"Dean S. Messing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FAQ entry also contains a pointer to _this bug_:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459756
Yea, and it still isn't listed in the "Common Bugs" list
the last time I checked.
--
fedora-list m
I forgot to say THANK YOU MAX! for providing the clue
to my problem with using the rpmfusion repos.
Dean
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidel
This message, from Max Kanat-Alexander in a parallel thread, is the
fix to my and many other people's similar problem:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:14:24 -0500 Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Errno 4] IOError:
> > Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for
> > repository: rpmfus
Deepak Shrestha wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Dean S. Messing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't imagine this being a network problem on my machine, router, or
> > provider as I can get to the darn repomd.xml file (and look inside
> > it!) via Firefox.
> >
> > Other suggestions?
> >
d directory, enable the baserul (i.e. remove the "#"
> >>> character), and disable the mirrorlist (i.e place a "#" at beginning
> >>> of line).
> >> See also:
> >> http://rpmfusion.org/FAQ
> >>
> >[...] I did that already (by ha
Jim wrote:
Janez Košmrlj wrote:
Jim wrote:
Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
The simplest workaround is these instructions:
http://www.fedorafaq.org/f10/#dns-slow
They are working perfectly well for me.
-Max
Max is right, And I second that.
Jim
Hi,
I tried the workaround me
Janez Košmrlj wrote:
Jim wrote:
Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:32:47 -0200 "Andre Costa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm having a *real* hard time trying to use F10 due to DNS problems [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459756]
The simplest workaround i
Jim wrote:
Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:32:47 -0200 "Andre Costa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm having a *real* hard time trying to use F10 due to DNS problems [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459756]
The simplest workaround is these instructions:
equires root privileges. If you are using yum to
install, you'd need to use su or sudo to run the command. For
example:
su -c 'yum install git'
It might help others to help you if you provided a little more detail
of what you are trying to do, how you are trying to do it, and how it
hi
i am running fedora 9 shulphur. i could not install any software in it.
when i try to install then it shows 'You don't have the necessary privileges to
install local packages'.
what can i do?
plz help me
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To uns
Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:32:47 -0200 "Andre Costa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm having a *real* hard time trying to use F10 due to DNS problems [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459756]
The simplest workaround is these instructions:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:32:47 -0200 "Andre Costa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm having a *real* hard time trying to use F10 due to DNS problems [
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459756]
The simplest workaround is these instructions:
http://www.fedorafaq.org/f10/#dns
ion*free*repo"
>> > }}}
>> >
>> > To undo the change later use this command:
>> > {{{
>> > su -c "sed -i 's|^baseurl|#baseurl| ; s|^#mirrorlist|mirrorlist|'
>> > /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion*free*repo"
>> > }}}
>
gested---namely
to comment out the mirrorlist URL and uncomment the baseurl?
Yes -- it was just meant as a "this is the easier way to do that" and
"feel free to point to this FAQ entry if similar problems show up in the
future". Sorry, should have mentioned that.
If yes
#mirrorlist|mirrorlist|'
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion*free*repo"
> > }}}
> >
Am I missing something here?
Doesn't this `sed' script do precisely what Kam Lao suggested---namely
to comment out the mirrorlist URL and uncomment the baseurl? If yes,
then
oarch.rpm
> >
> > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-stable.noarch.rpm
> >
> > which installed just fine.
> >
> > In fact:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | fgrep rpmfus
> > rpmfusion-nonfree-release-8-6.
elease-8-6.noarch
I can get to the metadata file "repomd.xml" just fine by plugging the
URL from the rpmfusion repo into Firefox, but try as I might, yum
refuses to go there or work at all unless I disable the rpmfusion
repos.
Can anyone help me (other some others) fix this?
Thanks
AIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | fgrep rpmfus
> rpmfusion-nonfree-release-8-6.noarch
> rpmfusion-free-release-8-6.noarch
>
> I can get to the metadata file "repomd.xml" just fine by plugging the
> URL from the rpmfusion repo into Firefox, but try as I might, yum
> refuses to
sion repo into Firefox, but try as I might, yum
refuses to go there or work at all unless I disable the rpmfusion
repos.
Can anyone help me (other some others) fix this?
Thanks
Dean
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-l
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 15:40, Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:14:48 -0200
> Andre Costa wrote:
>
> > Any additional ideas?
>
> 'fraid not :-(. I don't know where that nnswitch line
> came from, I've never seen that entry on my system,
> I just had file nis dns (and r
fault).
I have NM with static IP working just fine. Using the GUI may or may
not be causing the problems (as in, not writting to correct files or not
getting it correct or whatever), but you can try to get around it or
using a little simpler way to help? Try running
"system-config-network-tu
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:14:48 -0200
Andre Costa wrote:
> Any additional ideas?
'fraid not :-(. I don't know where that nnswitch line
came from, I've never seen that entry on my system,
I just had file nis dns (and removed nis when a
different bug cropped up).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-li
Hi Tom,
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 13:12, Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:32:47 -0200
> Andre Costa wrote:
>
> > Anyone knows what could cause this specific behavior? Any help will be
> much
> > appreciated. Let me know if you need add
Tom Horsley wrote:
> The absolute simplest way to get things running again is to install
> "bind" from the installation media (if it isn't already there),
> don't configure it at all, but just go ahead and start the "named"
> service it will install. This will get you a local DNS server that
> talk
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:32:47 -0200
Andre Costa wrote:
> Anyone knows what could cause this specific behavior? Any help will be much
> appreciated. Let me know if you need additional info.
The absolute simplest way to get things running again is to install
"bind" from the installat
's been designed for offline use... ;-)
So, I'll sum it all up here, hoping someone can help me.
I disabled ipv6 by putting
alias ipv6 off
alias net-pf-10 off
on my modprobe.conf
I installed 'named' so that I could have a IPv4-only local DNS cache, but
its configuration is not a
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 09:10 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I have a tiny program called "zeroify" which reads a line from input
> up to a
> newline, replaced the newline with a zero byte, and pushes it out
> stdout. Then I
> can use the "-0" option of xargs and not worry about special
> characters
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
That won't work if filenames contain blanks, something I fight daily.
For blanks, do something like "find . -name "*log" -exec rm -fr "{}" \;
I have a tiny program called "zeroify" which reads a line from input u
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 08:35:15PM -0500, RGH wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> Dave Ihnat wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
>>>
>>> Or for that matter, just "echo *log" instead of
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
Or for that matter, just "echo *log" instead of ls.
Neither of those are reliable. If there are enough matches to requi
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
That won't work if filenames contain blanks, something I fight daily.
For blanks, do something like "find . -name "*log" -exec rm -fr "{}" \;
Of course, that's assuming the name pattern is what you want.
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
Or for that matter, just "echo *log" instead of ls.
Neither of those are reliable. If there are enough matches to require
xargs, then both ls
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> That won't work if filenames contain blanks, something I fight daily.
For blanks, do something like "find . -name "*log" -exec rm -fr "{}" \;
Of course, that's assuming the name pattern is what you want. You can
also specify if you
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 04:10:50PM -0500, RGH wrote:
> The problem is that you're getting things like "Nov28-log:" back, with
> the trailing colon. Try this:
>ls -1d *log | xargs rm -Rf
> Note that the first option is a one, not an el.
Or for that matter, just "echo *log" instead of ls.
--
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 04:42 +0800, adrian kok wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have script to remove files but it can't work in
> directory
>
>
> ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
>
> those folders are:
>
> Nov28-log
> Nov29-log
> Nov30-log
You need to explain what you're trying to do exactly.
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
What is it you are trying to do here? Are you trying to remove files in the
directory leaving the directory name,
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
By 'folders', do you mean that these are directories? You need to 'rm
-rf' directories to remove the with their
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
The problem is that you're getting things like "Nov28-log:" back, with
the trailing colon. Try this:
ls -1
I did try it and it doesn't work!
Thank you
--- James Kosin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> adrian kok wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have script to remove files but it can't work in
> > directory
> >
> >
> > ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
> >
> > those folders are:
> >
> > Nov28-log
>
adrian kok wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have script to remove files but it can't work in
> directory
>
>
> ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
>
> those folders are:
>
> Nov28-log
> Nov29-log
> Nov30-log
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
You hav
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Read the thread from the beginning. Anne hadn't understood that a
> synopsis line such as:
i pick up on thread beginning with reg clemens post. problem is that i had
picked up wrong glasses and was not focusing correctly.
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 19:17 +, g wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > Indeed. In fact I don't know if it's even documented anywhere.
>
> years back when using cromix, it was documented. but i do believe that like
> a lot of other man p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Indeed. In fact I don't know if it's even documented anywhere.
years back when using cromix, it was documented. but i do believe that like
a lot of other man pages, things have been downsized or eliminated and moved
into
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 15:53 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2008 14:20:57 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 20:49 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thursday 27 November 2008 19:51:57 Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > > The options work, but they must be specified cor
On Friday 28 November 2008 14:20:57 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 20:49 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2008 19:51:57 Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > The options work, but they must be specified correctly. For example,
> > > the --provides and --whatprovides
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 20:49 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2008 19:51:57 Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > The options work, but they must be specified correctly. For example,
> > the --provides and --whatprovides options are "select-options" which
> > should be specified after the -q
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2008 19:51:57 Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> SYNOPSIS
>> QUERYING AND VERIFYING PACKAGES:
>> rpm {-q|--query} [select-options] [query-options]
>> [...]
>> select-options
>> [PACKAGE_NAME] [-a,--all] [-f,--file FILE]
>> [-g,--group
On Thursday 27 November 2008 19:51:57 Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The options work, but they must be specified correctly. For example,
> the --provides and --whatprovides options are "select-options" which
> should be specified after the -q or --query option. The man page does
> show this IMO.
>
> SY
Anne Wilson wrote:
> Yes, it all sounds very grand, doesn't it. But if all my efforts to
> understand it, over a period of more than 6 years, have failed,
> there is something not too smart about the situation. Why does the
> 'help' for rpm give so many options tha
On Thursday 27 November 2008 16:34:13 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>
> Well, like you'd do with any other program :)
>
> 1. consult a program's man-pages (man )
>
> 2. consult a program's "help"
> GNU standard compliant programs issue it with "
es had been abandoned in RH's/Fedora's rpm a long
time ago, because it's hardly applicable to dynamically evolving distros
such as Fedora.
No idea, why Mandriva has kept it.
> All I've seen in my experiments is
> 'no package provides packagename' but that coul
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:06:30 +
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How is anyone supposed to find their way through this maze?
It is stuff like this that makes linux fun! Think of it as
a game!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/ma
On Thursday 27 November 2008 05:10:50 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 22:00 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
> > I posted this question several hours ago, but it has never shown up on
> > the list,- here we go again...
> >
> > How do I find out what RPM package a given file is from?
>
> rpm
Reg Clemens wrote:
> I posted this question several hours ago, but it has never shown up
> on the list,- here we go again...
It looks like the original message you sent was help up for moderation
because it matched mailman's "administrivia" filter (it had only the
word "
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:00:09 -0700
Reg Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I find out what RPM package a given file is from?
> I know I knew how to do this at one time, but Ive reread the RPM
> MAN page 3 times and I cant find the right magic.
>
> In particular, I would like to know what
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 22:00 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
> I posted this question several hours ago, but it has never shown up on
> the list,- here we go again...
>
> How do I find out what RPM package a given file is from?
rpm -qf
> I know I knew how to do this at one time, but Ive reread the RP
801 - 900 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
