Re: How to uninstall kmod-nvidia

2009-12-21 Thread Neal Becker
Also, there is a new xorg-x11 in updates-testing. Working for me. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: How to uninstall kmod-nvidia

2009-12-21 Thread steven bellens
to 15 seconds before coming up (same with clicking a >> couple of the other widgets like the calendar). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533620 , the fix from Rex Dieter fixed the problem for me. regards, Steven >> >> So, how does one uninstall kmod-nvidia? >&g

Re: kmod-nvidia some actions X 100% CPU

2009-12-21 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 06:21 -0800, Rich Emberson wrote: > Need to fix kmod-nvidia or uninstall it. > > This weekend installed fedora 12 on laptop replacing > fedora 9. > Laptop has a GeForce 9600M GT nvidia card. > With fedora 9, used kmod with no problems. > After initi

Re: How to uninstall kmod-nvidia

2009-12-21 Thread Mauriat Miranda
ts like the calendar). > > So, how does one uninstall kmod-nvidia? > > In a previous post I asked for help to fix the problem, > now I'd just like to go back to the nouveau driver. Worth looking at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F12_bugs#Problems_when_using_KDE_

How to uninstall kmod-nvidia

2009-12-21 Thread Rich Emberson
: The panel "Kickstart Application launcher" when clicked now causes 100% X process CPU usage for 10 to 15 seconds before coming up (same with clicking a couple of the other widgets like the calendar). So, how does one uninstall kmod-nvidia? In a previous post I asked for help to fix t

kmod-nvidia some actions X 100% CPU

2009-12-21 Thread Rich Emberson
Need to fix kmod-nvidia or uninstall it. This weekend installed fedora 12 on laptop replacing fedora 9. Laptop has a GeForce 9600M GT nvidia card. With fedora 9, used kmod with no problems. After initial install, using the default nouveau worked. Following: http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm

Re: F11 Nvidia 8300 GS and kmod-nvidia-PAE fail

2009-11-08 Thread Zacharie Elcor
same problem for me with a 7900GS except I don't see any syslog message about selinux when X tries to start. Disabling selinux seems to get round it. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > > Has anyone had a total failure to run kmod-nvidia with an 8300 GS graphics &g

F11 Nvidia 8300 GS and kmod-nvidia-PAE fail

2009-10-28 Thread Mike Cloaked
Has anyone had a total failure to run kmod-nvidia with an 8300 GS graphics card in f11? My system (http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_0461ec99-2d05-44bf-ac48-1a0d78a17c52) used to run with the kmod-nvidia-PAE installed from rpmfusion just fine in f10 with no issues at all. When I installed

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
Please don't post in HTML to this list. See the Guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Commu

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-19 Thread arelem
  On 19/10/2009 7:01 PM Mike Cloaked wrote:Roger-111 wrote:> > > I found the repos are dangerous and very difficult to find. Yum could > not find kmod-nvidia nor akmod-nvidia but locked up until I manually > removed them from repos.d .They don't or didn't for me provide

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-19 Thread Tim
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 20:27 +1100, Roger wrote: > I found the repos are dangerous and very difficult to find. Yum could > not find kmod-nvidia nor akmod-nvidia but locked up until I manually > removed them from repos.d I don't, and didn't... On the converse, the NVidia

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-19 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 08:34 +1000, are...@bigpond.com wrote: > > > > > __ > > Just another data point: F11 kmod-nvidia packages from rpmfusion work > fine with my GeForce 8300 and my Quadro NVS 140

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-19 Thread Mike Cloaked
Roger-111 wrote: > > > I found the repos are dangerous and very difficult to find. Yum could > not find kmod-nvidia nor akmod-nvidia but locked up until I manually > removed them from repos.d .They don't or didn't for me provide any > useful applications and c

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-18 Thread anpa0508
- Följande är ett automatiskt svar - på ditt meddelande till anpa0...@telia.com --- Begin Message ---    Just another data point: F11 kmod-nvidia packages from rpmfusion workfine with my GeForce 8300 and my Quadro NVS 140M.Matthew SaltzmanWhere did you find the F11

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-18 Thread arelem
   Just another data point: F11 kmod-nvidia packages from rpmfusion workfine with my GeForce 8300 and my Quadro NVS 140M.Matthew SaltzmanWhere did you find the F11 kmod-nvidia. I must have found the wrong info.Roger-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-18 Thread Matthew Saltzman
> If you are building it yourself, you'll have to rebuild it again > > I've been through the painful process of getting nvidia drivers to work, > > it's taken days of experimetnation. > I found the repos are dangerous and very difficult to find. Yum could &g

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-18 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:42 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 10/17/2009 07:32 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote: > > I upgraded the kernel. What's the process to get the corresponding matching > > nvidia driver? > > Depending on where you got your *last* nvidia driver from (either > rpmfusion or atrpms

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-18 Thread Roger
ken days of experimetnation. I found the repos are dangerous and very difficult to find. Yum could not find kmod-nvidia nor akmod-nvidia but locked up until I manually removed them from repos.d .They don't or didn't for me provide any useful applications and crashed the system. I resort

Re: Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-17 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 10/17/2009 07:32 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I upgraded the kernel. What's the process to get the corresponding matching > nvidia driver? Depending on where you got your *last* nvidia driver from (either rpmfusion or atrpms), you should just have to do a "yum update". Remember to enable the appr

Upgrade to2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.PAE Can I get kmod-nvidia to go with it?

2009-10-17 Thread Steven W. Orr
I upgraded the kernel. What's the process to get the corresponding matching nvidia driver? TIA -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided

Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Danesh Manoharan
t > > update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new > > kernel. > > > > Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ? > > It would probably better to ask this on an rpm fusion list. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list &

Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 00:56:23 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote: > 'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available. However, those of us > running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot > update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the

Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Linuxguy123
drivers (for various reasons) cannot > > > update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new > > > kernel. > > > > > > Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > PS

Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:04 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Linuxguy123 wrote: > > 'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available. However, those of us > > running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot > > update because the new kmod-nvidia

Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Joachim Backes
Linuxguy123 wrote: 'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available. However, those of us running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new kernel. Could someone build it and push it out to t

kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-17 Thread Linuxguy123
'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available. However, those of us running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new kernel. Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ? Than

Re: kmod-nvidia revisited

2009-08-06 Thread gilpel
>>sam.sharpe wrote: >> >>> There is however, no guarantee that akmod will generate a working >>> module >> >>I'm sure experts on this group aren't afraid the lesser bit by what you >>say here, but I find that rpmfusion does a really good job of making >>sure everything just works. And they do it in

Re: kmod-nvidia revisited

2009-08-06 Thread sam . sharpe+lists . redhat
>sam.sharpe wrote: > >> There is however, no guarantee that akmod will generate a working >> module > >I'm sure experts on this group aren't afraid the lesser bit by what you >say here, but I find that rpmfusion does a really good job of making >sure everything just works. And they do it in a very

Re: kmod-nvidia revisited

2009-08-06 Thread gilpel
sam.sharpe wrote: > There is however, no guarantee that akmod will generate a working > module I'm sure experts on this group aren't afraid the lesser bit by what you say here, but I find that rpmfusion does a really good job of making sure everything just works. And they do it in a very timely m

Re: kmod-nvidia revisited

2009-08-06 Thread sam . sharpe+lists . redhat
g-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64 Aug 06 14:34:22 >Updated: kmod-nvidia-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64 Aug 06 14:34:24 Updated: >xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64 Aug 06 14:34:29 Updated: >kmod-nvidia-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.x86_64-185.18.29-1.fc11.x86_64 >Aug 06 14:34:36 Installed: &

Re: kmod-nvidia revisited

2009-08-06 Thread Phil Meyer
On 08/06/2009 01:11 PM, Michael Hannon wrote: Hi, folks. I just wanted to say a few (more) words about the kmod-nvidia issue that I raised yesterday. First, I apologize for hijacking a previous thread. I was just trying to grab the address of the list. The deeper ramifications didn't

kmod-nvidia revisited

2009-08-06 Thread Michael Hannon
Hi, folks. I just wanted to say a few (more) words about the kmod-nvidia issue that I raised yesterday. First, I apologize for hijacking a previous thread. I was just trying to grab the address of the list. The deeper ramifications didn't occur to me at the time. Second, as several p

Re: kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-06 Thread Marko Vojinovic
I gave up eventually... If people are not capable of searching the list archives, repeating it over and over gets very boring at some point. ;-) Besides, this is a hijacked thread, most people will not even see it. On a side note, I wonder why the kmod-nvidia is not just a link to the akmod- nvi

Re: kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-06 Thread Linuxguy123
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 07:35 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote: > > > > Hi, folks. I've got an AMD, 64-bit PC running Fedora 11. I've been using > > the kmod-nvidia driver for graphics. With the update to the latest > > kernel: > > > > 2.6.29.6-2

Re: kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-06 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:01:35 -0700 (PDT), Michael Hannon wrote: > > Hi, folks. I've got an AMD, 64-bit PC running Fedora 11. I've been > using the kmod-nvidia driver for graphics. With the update to the > latest kernel: > > 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 > &g

Re: kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-06 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:18 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:01 -0700, Michael Hannon wrote: > > Hi, folks. I've got an AMD, 64-bit PC running Fedora 11. I've been using > > the kmod-nvidia driver for graphics. With the update to the latest kern

Re: kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-05 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:01 -0700, Michael Hannon wrote: > Hi, folks. I've got an AMD, 64-bit PC running Fedora 11. I've been using > the kmod-nvidia driver for graphics. With the update to the latest kernel: > > 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 > > I s

Re: kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-05 Thread Armin Moradi
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:35 PM, wrote: >> >> Hi, folks.  I've got an AMD, 64-bit PC running Fedora 11.  I've been using >> the kmod-nvidia driver for graphics.  With the update to the latest >> kernel: >> >>     2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 >>

Re: kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-05 Thread gilpel
> > Hi, folks. I've got an AMD, 64-bit PC running Fedora 11. I've been using > the kmod-nvidia driver for graphics. With the update to the latest > kernel: > > 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 > > I seem to have lost that driver. You haven't. It

kmod-nvidia?

2009-08-05 Thread Michael Hannon
Hi, folks. I've got an AMD, 64-bit PC running Fedora 11. I've been using the kmod-nvidia driver for graphics. With the update to the latest kernel: 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 I seem to have lost that driver. [root ~]# rpm -qa | grep kmod libmikmod-3.2.0-4.beta2.f

Re: (Solved) Did I really install Kmod-Nvidia ?

2009-07-12 Thread gilpel
d to run nvidia-xconfig or other tools. > > GeForce 6 and higher (mine is a 9400 GT) > > yum install kmod-nvidia > > Fedora 11 and nouveau > > As nouveau is enabled by default starting with Fedora 11, you may > experience problem which is caused by the nouveau kernel modu

Re: Did I really install Kmod-Nvidia ?

2009-07-10 Thread gilpel
Paul W. Frields wrote: > I think this is a known problem; I filed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501601 This is not the problem I have. Mine has nothing to do with power management. I never have to reboot. As I said, I had it before with an old ATI card and very common GPLed dri

Re: Did I really install Kmod-Nvidia ?

2009-07-10 Thread gilpel
here is no need to run nvidia-xconfig or other tools. GeForce 6 and higher (mine is a 9400 GT) yum install kmod-nvidia Fedora 11 and nouveau As nouveau is enabled by default starting with Fedora 11, you may experience problem which is caused by the nouveau kernel module being present in the in

Re: Did I really install Kmod-Nvidia ?

2009-07-10 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 08:24:32PM -0400, Bret wrote: > On 07/09/2009 10:13 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote: [...SNIP...] >> The Nouveau driver worked very well and, since I'm not too sure I'll >> install 3D, maybe I could have kept it. But my screen kept blanking once >> in a while for a few seconds.

Re: Did I really install Kmod-Nvidia ?

2009-07-09 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:13 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote: > the process was so transparent, I can't help but wonder if all those > modifications to the kernel that I read about in the doc have been > made. What modifications to the kernel are you expecting? kmod's just another set of drivers an

Re: Did I really install Kmod-Nvidia ?

2009-07-09 Thread Bret
On 07/09/2009 10:13 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote: There are all sorts of instructions as to how to install Kmod-Nvidia on Fedora, but I thought yum would do a better job of guessing my configuration (x86_64, 9400 GT) to get the most up-to-date correct package and getting everything right. So, I

Did I really install Kmod-Nvidia ?

2009-07-09 Thread gilpel
There are all sorts of instructions as to how to install Kmod-Nvidia on Fedora, but I thought yum would do a better job of guessing my configuration (x86_64, 9400 GT) to get the most up-to-date correct package and getting everything right. So, I just typed: yum install kmod-nvidia Now, /etc/X11

Re: kmod-nvidia yum update problem

2009-05-05 Thread Steve
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 05.05.2009 15:54, Steve wrote: > > I get this error when trying to update kmod-nvidia package: > > > > Test Transaction Errors: > > file /lib/modules/2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia.ko from > > install of >

Re: kmod-nvidia yum update problem

2009-05-05 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 05.05.2009 15:54, Steve wrote: I get this error when trying to update kmod-nvidia package: Test Transaction Errors: file /lib/modules/2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia.ko from install of kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64-173.14.15-1.fc9.12.x86_64 conflicts with file

kmod-nvidia yum update problem

2009-05-05 Thread Steve
I get this error when trying to update kmod-nvidia package: Test Transaction Errors: file /lib/modules/2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia.ko from install of kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64-173.14.15-1.fc9.12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kmod-nvidia

Re: kmod-nvidia and rpmfusion problem

2009-04-22 Thread Tim
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 18:58 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > Try clearing your cache (yum clean all) and trying again Before throwing out all, try "yum clean metadata". Usually, that's all that's needed to deal with an out-of-whack repo. "yum clean all" throws away all your downloaded and cached pack

Re: kmod-nvidia and rpmfusion problem

2009-04-21 Thread Gary Waters
Gary Waters wrote: I'm trying to install the kmod-nvidia driver. I typed "yum install kmod-nvidia" and got swamped by errors such as this: Downloading Packages: (1/4): kmod-nvidia-180.29-1.fc10.2.x86_64.rpm | 24 kB

Re: kmod-nvidia and rpmfusion problem

2009-04-21 Thread Chris Tyler
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 18:47 -0400, Gary Waters wrote: > I'm trying to install the kmod-nvidia driver. I typed "yum install > kmod-nvidia" and got swamped by errors such as this: > > Downloading Packages: > (1/4): kmod-nvidia-180.29-1.fc10.2.x86_64.rpm &g

kmod-nvidia and rpmfusion problem

2009-04-21 Thread Gary Waters
I'm trying to install the kmod-nvidia driver. I typed "yum install kmod-nvidia" and got swamped by errors such as this: Downloading Packages: (1/4): kmod-nvidia-180.29-1.fc10.2.x86_64.rpm  |  24 kB

Re: nvidia driver, kmod-nvidia-PAE question

2009-04-05 Thread Antonio Olivares
--- On Sun, 4/5/09, Mail Lists wrote: > From: Mail Lists > Subject: Re: nvidia driver, kmod-nvidia-PAE question > To: olivares14...@yahoo.com, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice > for using Fedora." > Date: Sunday, April 5, 2009, 3:22 PM > On

Re: nvidia driver, kmod-nvidia-PAE question

2009-04-05 Thread Mail Lists
On 04/05/2009 02:57 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > Dear fellow Fedora users, > > I was having trouble playing DVD's with Fedora on a Quad Core machine, and I > decided to install the nvidia driver from rpmfusion and it has cured the > problem :), thanks to those guys for the work they do. >

nvidia driver, kmod-nvidia-PAE question

2009-04-05 Thread Antonio Olivares
ill I have to # yum install kmod-nvidia-PAE again versus the new kernel, or will the update to the new kernel automagcially fix the driver against the new kernel. I really don't understand the kmod and/or dkms part of the drivers. I have seen similar things for the modems like the 11c110

Re: Resolved: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-06 Thread Joe Kazura
Just wondering ... are you using the following yum plug-in: yum-fastestmirror.noarch : Yum plugin which chooses fastest repository from a mirrorlist Joe On Mar 5, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Linuxguy123 wrote: The kmod-nvidia package for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

Re: Resolved: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-05 Thread Rick Stevens
Linuxguy123 wrote: The kmod-nvidia package for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10 mysteriously showed up on my update list this morning. I have no idea why it took this long to appear. I didn't make any changes to my system. Whatever happened, this problem is resolved. Your mirrors pro

Resolved: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-05 Thread Linuxguy123
The kmod-nvidia package for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10 mysteriously showed up on my update list this morning. I have no idea why it took this long to appear. I didn't make any changes to my system. Whatever happened, this problem is resolved. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-04 Thread Michael Eager
Linuxguy123 wrote: The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that. Its still missing. I make this post in case the powers that be don't realize its missing. Thanks for listening. I also did not

Re: What are these yum plugins for ? (kmod-nvidia related)

2009-03-04 Thread Axel Thimm
bling them one by one. Edit > > > > > > /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/*.conf > > > > > > and set > > > > > > enabled=0 > > > > > > to disable the plugin(s) and try again. > > > > or use yum --disableplugin=[plugin] > > I disabled

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:03:00 -0700 Linuxguy123 wrote: > I disabled all my yum plugins. I still do not have access to the > kmod-nvidia package for this kernel. Any ideas ? How do I fix this ? Are you sure you have the correct repository enabled? (Note: Installed != Enabled) -- ME

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-04 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 06:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Linuxguy123 wrote: > > I just ran yum update and it didn't install the new kmod-nvidia module. > > I ran yum list kmod-nvidia* and the new package isn't there. The new > > kmod-nvidia module is still not

Re: What are these yum plugins for ? (kmod-nvidia related)

2009-03-04 Thread Linuxguy123
t; and set > > > > enabled=0 > > > > to disable the plugin(s) and try again. > > or use yum --disableplugin=[plugin] I disabled all of them. No kmod-nvidia packages become available. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: What are these yum plugins for ? (kmod-nvidia related)

2009-03-04 Thread suvayu ali
2009/3/4 Axel Thimm : > Neither should the other plugins do, but at the very end you will only > know for sure if you start disabling them one by one. Edit > > /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/*.conf > > and set > > enabled=0 > > to disable the plugin(s) and try again. or use yum --disableplugin=[plugin] --

Re: What are these yum plugins for ? (kmod-nvidia related)

2009-03-04 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:47:54AM -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: > What are the following yum plugins for ? > > downloadonly, kmdl, priorities, refresh-packagekit > > Could any of them interfere with my ability to "see" (ie yum list) the > most recent kmod-nvidia pack

What are these yum plugins for ? (kmod-nvidia related)

2009-03-04 Thread Linuxguy123
What are the following yum plugins for ? downloadonly, kmdl, priorities, refresh-packagekit Could any of them interfere with my ability to "see" (ie yum list) the most recent kmod-nvidia package ? Thanks LG -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscr

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-04 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 06:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Linuxguy123 wrote: > > I just ran yum update and it didn't install the new kmod-nvidia module. > > I ran yum list kmod-nvidia* and the new package isn't there. The new > > kmod-nvidia module is still not

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Linuxguy123 wrote: > I just ran yum update and it didn't install the new kmod-nvidia module. > I ran yum list kmod-nvidia* and the new package isn't there. The new > kmod-nvidia module is still not available on whatever mirror my computer > connects to. I'll try again

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Claude Jones
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 23:56:45 Linuxguy123 wrote: > What is up with that ? real live people have to do that work - it doesn't always get done when you want it - they don't consult you on that question but, I'll tell you a secret - install the akmod package for your kernel, and you'll never ha

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 21:37 -0600, Ron Siven wrote: > Linuxguy123 wrote: > > The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. > > > > Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that. > > Its still missing. > > > > I

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Ron Siven
Linuxguy123 wrote: The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that. Its still missing. I make this post in case the powers that be don't realize its missing. Thanks for listening. Linuxguy123

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Christopher A. Williams
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 17:23 -0600, Ron Siven wrote: > Linuxguy123 wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:15 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:07 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: > >> > >>> The kmod-nvidia package

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Ron Siven
Linuxguy123 wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:15 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:07 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that. Its

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Rick Stevens
Linuxguy123 wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:15 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:07 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that. Its still

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:15 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:07 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: > > The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. > > > > Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that.

Re: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Christopher A. Williams
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:07 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: > The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. > > Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that. > Its still missing. > > I make this post in case the powers that be don

kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-03 Thread Linuxguy123
The kmod-nvidia package is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10. Yes, I know it is based on proprietary code. Lets not get into that. Its still missing. I make this post in case the powers that be don't realize its missing. Thanks for listening. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora

Re: F10: Nvidia Gforce FX5200 is no more supported by kmod-nvidia

2008-11-26 Thread Lonni J Friedman
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Joachim Backes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > can somebody explain why Nvidia gforce fx5200 video cards are no more > supported by kmod-nvidia: i can install kmod.nvidia from livna in F10, but a > boot into level 5 fails. > &

Re: F10: Nvidia Gforce FX5200 is no more supported by kmod-nvidia

2008-11-26 Thread Steve Berg
> Hi, > > can somebody explain why Nvidia gforce fx5200 video cards are no more > supported by kmod-nvidia: i can install kmod.nvidia from livna in F10, > but a boot into level 5 fails. > > During boot, there is a recommendation: install a driver from NVIDIA. > > Wh

F10: Nvidia Gforce FX5200 is no more supported by kmod-nvidia

2008-11-26 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, can somebody explain why Nvidia gforce fx5200 video cards are no more supported by kmod-nvidia: i can install kmod.nvidia from livna in F10, but a boot into level 5 fails. During boot, there is a recommendation: install a driver from NVIDIA. Why no more by livna? Regards -- Joachim

Re: livna: could we have kmod-nvidia-2.6.26.6-49 for f8 ?

2008-10-25 Thread Linuxguy123
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 18:22 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 25.10.2008 15:35, Linuxguy123 wrote: > > I am running the latest stable kernel for my Fedora 8 installation. > > > > $ uname -a > > Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.26.6-49.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 15:59:36 > > EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 G

Re: livna: could we have kmod-nvidia-2.6.26.6-49 for f8 ?

2008-10-25 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 25.10.2008 15:35, Linuxguy123 wrote: I am running the latest stable kernel for my Fedora 8 installation. $ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.26.6-49.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 15:59:36 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I would like an nvidia driver for this kernel. It doesn't seem to be a

livna: could we have kmod-nvidia-2.6.26.6-49 for f8 ?

2008-10-25 Thread Linuxguy123
I am running the latest stable kernel for my Fedora 8 installation. $ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.26.6-49.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Oct 17 15:59:36 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I would like an nvidia driver for this kernel. It doesn't seem to be available. $ yum list kmod-nvidia-2