>>sam.sharpe wrote:
>>
>>> There is however, no guarantee that akmod will generate a working
>>> module
>>
>>I'm sure experts on this group aren't afraid the lesser bit by what you
>>say here, but I find that rpmfusion does a really good job of making
>>sure everything just works. And they do it in
>sam.sharpe wrote:
>
>> There is however, no guarantee that akmod will generate a working
>> module
>
>I'm sure experts on this group aren't afraid the lesser bit by what you
>say here, but I find that rpmfusion does a really good job of making
>sure everything just works. And they do it in a very
sam.sharpe wrote:
> There is however, no guarantee that akmod will generate a working
> module
I'm sure experts on this group aren't afraid the lesser bit by what you
say here, but I find that rpmfusion does a really good job of making sure
everything just works. And they do it in a very timely m
gil...@altern.org wrote:
>Phil Meyer wrote:
>> The akmod tools will rebuild the kernel module(s) for you
>> on the boot of the new kernel.
>
> Really? I thought it involved some extra manip. Here's my last kmod
> upgrade:
>
>Aug 06 14:34:22 Updated:
>xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-185.18.31-1.fc11.x86_64
On 08/06/2009 01:11 PM, Michael Hannon wrote:
Hi, folks. I just wanted to say a few (more) words about the kmod-nvidia
issue that I raised yesterday.
First, I apologize for hijacking a previous thread. I was just trying to grab
the address of the list. The deeper ramifications didn't occur to
Hi, folks. I just wanted to say a few (more) words about the kmod-nvidia
issue that I raised yesterday.
First, I apologize for hijacking a previous thread. I was just trying to grab
the address of the list. The deeper ramifications didn't occur to me at the
time.
Second, as several people hav
