On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 23:29 -0400, William Case wrote:
Hi Patrick;
As I said I am now satisfied that a conflict between some entity called
'network' or NM is the cause of my problems. So some of this discussion
is a bit moot.
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 20:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Ok, can I give it a try to help clear things up? Not that I am an expert on
the subject, but hopefully... :-) Somebody please correct me if I get
something wrong here.
When we speak of network, there are several layers at work here.
First, there is hardware. Cables, network cards at their
Thanks for your time and thoughtful explanation Marko;
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 20:49 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Ok, can I give it a try to help clear things up? Not that I am an expert on
the subject, but hopefully... :-) Somebody please correct me if I get
something wrong here.
[BIG SNIP]
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 17:57 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 17:10 -0400, William Case wrote:
Thank you Matthew. That was why I was double checking.
[snip]
To ensure that the network service does not run at boot, run 'chkconfig
network off' as root. If the network service
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 18:41 -0400, William Case wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 17:57 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 17:10 -0400, William Case wrote:
Thank you Matthew. That was why I was double checking.
[snip]
To ensure that the network service does not run at boot,
William Case wrote:
So why can't I get rid of 'network' entirely? I understand that
'network' is not an application to be removed, but something is sticking
it in the list of services. With NetworkManager running, 'network' is
not a service I need. So why confuse the issue?
It is handy
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 18:41 -0400, William Case wrote:
So why can't I get rid of 'network' entirely? I understand that
'network' is not an application to be removed, but something is
sticking it in the list of services. With NetworkManager running,
'network' is not a service I need. So why
Hi Patrick;
As I said I am now satisfied that a conflict between some entity called
'network' or NM is the cause of my problems. So some of this discussion
is a bit moot.
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 20:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 18:41 -0400, William Case wrote:
So
