Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Steve Repo
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Murphy wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:08 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: >> >>> Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between GigE ports on my data >>> servers. >>> >>> >> >> Should the bond0 be controlled by NM or

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Chris Snook
Frank Murphy wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:08 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between GigE ports on my data servers. Should the bond0 be controlled by NM or network? Network. Here's the bonding configuration (eth1 and eth2) on my F8 test box. You'll

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Chris Snook
Mark Haney wrote: Steve Repo wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Frank Murphy wrote: Is this included in fedora 8. http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding Tried yum info */ifenslave Frank Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between Gig

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Mark Haney
Steve Repo wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Frank Murphy wrote: Is this included in fedora 8. http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding Tried yum info */ifenslave Frank Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between GigE ports on my data

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Mark Haney
Frank Murphy wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:08 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between GigE ports on my data servers. Should the bond0 be controlled by NM or network? Frank Since I never use NM on my servers (rarely do I load X on them) I always use

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 20:46:13 +0530, Steve Repo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does bonding really use both interfaces for data transfer or use the > second interface only if the first one is maxed out? I believe it is supposed to make it look like one layer 2 connection. I would expect pack

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Steve Repo
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Murphy wrote: >> >> Is this included in fedora 8. >> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding >> >> Tried yum info */ifenslave >> >> Frank >> >> > > Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between GigE ports on my

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:08 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between GigE ports on my data > servers. > > Should the bond0 be controlled by NM or network? Frank > -- gpg id EB547226 Revoked Forgot Password :( aMSN: Frankly3D http://www.frankly3d.com --

Re: nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Mark Haney
Frank Murphy wrote: Is this included in fedora 8. http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding Tried yum info */ifenslave Frank Yeah it's included, I use it all the time between GigE ports on my data servers. -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Han

nic bonding Fedora 8

2008-09-23 Thread Frank Murphy
Is this included in fedora 8. http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding Tried yum info */ifenslave Frank -- gpg id EB547226 Revoked Forgot Password :( aMSN: Frankly3D http://www.frankly3d.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-list mailing list f