On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
>> I have just upgraded from F11 to F12, and now when I mount a samba
>> partition with command
>>
>> mount -t cifs -o iocharset=iso8859-1,user="xxx",rw //xxx /mnt/mydir
>>
>> I do not hav
Around 07:27pm on Thursday, November 26, 2009 (UK time), Paul Smith scrawled:
> I have just upgraded from F11 to F12, and now when I mount a samba
> partition with command
>
> mount -t cifs -o iocharset=iso8859-1,user="xxx",rw //xxx /mnt/mydir
>
> I do not hav
Dear All,
I have just upgraded from F11 to F12, and now when I mount a samba
partition with command
mount -t cifs -o iocharset=iso8859-1,user="xxx",rw //xxx /mnt/mydir
I do not have writing permissions on the mounted directory.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
fedora-list ma
xpress myself quite well.
Is there any other solution for this problem where it isn´t necessary
to re-export the shares?
2009/11/12 Rick Stevens :
> On 11/12/2009 11:41 AM, Bruno Galindro da Costa wrote:
>>
>> Hi yall,
>>
>> Is it possible to clear the nfs cache permissi
On 11/12/2009 11:41 AM, Bruno Galindro da Costa wrote:
Hi yall,
Is it possible to clear the nfs cache permissions? I´m asking this
because I´ve made a NFS share with client access restrictions and the
users that have no more permissions, can still access the share.
The share has the following
Hi yall,
Is it possible to clear the nfs cache permissions? I´m asking this
because I´ve made a NFS share with client access restrictions and the
users that have no more permissions, can still access the share.
The share has the following permissions (2770):
drwxrws--- 5 nobody vmail 1024
Tim:
>> Also, how have you got SELinux set?
Tom Horsley:
> Nah, selinux gets turned off first thing.
I'd recommend using it with any public services. And even on private
networks, where you might have rogue clients.
But I have to ask, did you actually disable it, or just put it into
permissive
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:53:58 -0400
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> 4. Then, in the zone definitions in the named.conf file, you need to point
> to
> the subdirectory with something like:
> file "dynamic/lcl.db";
> rather than:
> file "lcl.db";
Yep, I was beginning to suspect that was the
permission denied
>
> I'm not sure what directory it is trying to write those
> in, but I found and chmodded a few more directories
> and haven't seen one of those messages since.
>
> Should directory permissions be adjusted in one or more
> of the rpms to take these thin
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:10:11 +0930
Tim wrote:
> Also, how have you got SELinux set?
Nah, selinux gets turned off first thing.
I didn't have the /var/named/chroot/var/named/data
directory, but I created it, and I still see it
writing .jnl files in /var/named/chroot/var/named
Maybe I just have a
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:21 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I recently enabled dynamic DNS for the virtual machines I've
> been installing and named started getting errors (running
> as chroot) trying to write .jnl files to the /var/named
> directory under the chroot. Fixing the directory to
> be root:
irectories
and haven't seen one of those messages since.
Should directory permissions be adjusted in one or more
of the rpms to take these things into account?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
G
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Robert L Cochran
wrote:
> While trying to fix a problem where users of the Fedora version of Wordpress
> are unable to upload images using the Wordpress screens and code, I spent a
> lot of time modifying file and directory permissions in
> /usr/sha
While trying to fix a problem where users of the Fedora version of
Wordpress are unable to upload images using the Wordpress screens and
code, I spent a lot of time modifying file and directory permissions in
/usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/*, trying various combinations
of user-group
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/10/2009 11:19 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> I think what is happening is this: gedit has been instrumented to
>> preserve the security.selinux attribute on files. This works fine when
>> SELinux is enabled, as SELinux applies a set of permission checks on
>> setting
nux which I don't need.
>>>
>>> As a result many files have permissions which include a dot at the end,
>>> e.g.:
>>>
>>> -rw-rw-r--.
>>>
>>> This causes havoc with many applications, i.e. gedit complains it cannot
>>> mak
Stephen Smalley wrote the following on 09/10/2009 02:57 PM:
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 07:58 +0200, Sean Carlos wrote:
At one point I performed a new Fedora install and restored my personal
files before disabling SELinux which I don't need.
As a result many files have permissions which incl
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 10:58 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/10/2009 01:58 AM, Sean Carlos wrote:
> >
> > At one point I performed a new Fedora install and restored my personal
> > files before disabling SELinux which I don't need.
> >
> > As a re
On 09/10/2009 01:58 AM, Sean Carlos wrote:
>
> At one point I performed a new Fedora install and restored my personal
> files before disabling SELinux which I don't need.
>
> As a result many files have permissions which include a dot at the end,
> e.g.:
>
> -rw-r
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 07:58 +0200, Sean Carlos wrote:
> At one point I performed a new Fedora install and restored my personal
> files before disabling SELinux which I don't need.
>
> As a result many files have permissions which include a dot at the end,
> e.g.:
>
At one point I performed a new Fedora install and restored my personal
files before disabling SELinux which I don't need.
As a result many files have permissions which include a dot at the end,
e.g.:
-rw-rw-r--.
This causes havoc with many applications, i.e. gedit complains it c
El sáb, 05-09-2009 a las 12:52 -0400, Robert L Cochran escribió:
> I installed the Fedora package of wordpress and promptly created a user
> account for myself and tried to upload a photo to my first post. The
> upload keeps failing due to permissions problems. Wordpress wants to
>
I installed the Fedora package of wordpress and promptly created a user
account for myself and tried to upload a photo to my first post. The
upload keeps failing due to permissions problems. Wordpress wants to
upload (via php scripts) to
/usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09.
I
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:25:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 02:22 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
>> Looking at file permissions, I see there is a . at the end of the
>> permissions. As in
>>
>>
>> [r...@phoenix ~]# ls -l somefile
>
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 02:22 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
> Looking at file permissions, I see there is a . at the end of the
> permissions. As in
>
>
> [r...@phoenix ~]# ls -l somefile
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-07-14 22:20 somefile
>
> ^
>
Looking at file permissions, I see there is a . at the end of the
permissions. As in
[r...@phoenix ~]# ls -l somefile
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-07-14 22:20 somefile
^
here
That's new to me. What does it mean? Where is it documented?
--
fedora-list mailing
Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 17:10 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
/etc/fstab on the client box9:
192.168.1.48:/home/NFS-files/mnt/homenfs defaults,rw,user
0 0
192.168.1.48:/media/SimpleDrive/data/ /mnt/home nfs
defaults,rw,user0 0
As C
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 17:10 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> /etc/fstab on the client box9:
>
> 192.168.1.48:/home/NFS-files/mnt/homenfs defaults,rw,user
> 0 0
> 192.168.1.48:/media/SimpleDrive/data/ /mnt/home nfs
> defaults,rw,user0 0
As Craig said,
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:02:32 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I used /mnt/home since that was what was used in an example that I
> followed first time around. It seemed ok to me since /mnt has
> nothing in it. What would be a better choice?
I use /mnt/ for mounting nfs shares, and for mount
Craig White wrote:
you definitely should not have " targeted for the
same mount point (/mnt/home) - that is a problem. Also, it is tricky to
do 'user' mounts because users would necessarily have write permissions.
So I would suggest that as root, you not only fix /etc/fstab o
anyone tell me how to enable user "bobg" to access the nfs server on
> >>>> my box48?
> >>>>
> >>>> At the rate I'm going I will have all the permissions set to 777, will
> >>>> need a new install to get them back where they ought
Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
2009/7/4 Bob Goodwin :
Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
2009/7/4 Bob Goodwin :
Can anyone tell me how to enable user "bobg" to access the nfs server on
my box48?
At the rate I'm going I will have all the permissions set to 777, will
need a new inst
2009/7/4 Bob Goodwin :
> Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/4 Bob Goodwin :
>>
>>>
>>> Can anyone tell me how to enable user "bobg" to access the nfs server on
>>> my box48?
>>>
>>> At the rate I'm going I will have a
Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
2009/7/4 Bob Goodwin :
Can anyone tell me how to enable user "bobg" to access the nfs server on my
box48?
At the rate I'm going I will have all the permissions set to 777, will need
a new install to get them back where they ought to be.
[b...@box9 ~
2009/7/4 Bob Goodwin :
> Can anyone tell me how to enable user "bobg" to access the nfs server on my
> box48?
>
> At the rate I'm going I will have all the permissions set to 777, will need
> a new install to get them back where they ought to be.
>
> [b.
Can anyone tell me how to enable user "bobg" to access the nfs server on
my box48?
At the rate I'm going I will have all the permissions set to 777, will
need a new install to get them back where they ought to be.
[b...@box9 ~]$ ll -al /mnt/home
ls: cannot access /mnt/h
William Case wrote:
> I have a program that I suspect has a permissions bug.
It could be an SELinux-related problem.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.
2009/5/15 William Case :
> Hi;
>
> Don't waste time on explaining how permissions work. I have got that
> right down to the kernel level.
>
> I have a program that I suspect has a permissions bug. I have checked
> dmesg and nothing is said about a permissions proble
Hi Rick and thanks;
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 11:24 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > Don't waste time on explaining how permissions work. I have got that
> > right down to the kernel level.
> >
> > I have a program t
William Case wrote:
Hi;
Don't waste time on explaining how permissions work. I have got that
right down to the kernel level.
I have a program that I suspect has a permissions bug. I have checked
dmesg and nothing is said about a permissions problem. Can I count on
dmesg ALWAYS being
Hi;
Don't waste time on explaining how permissions work. I have got that
right down to the kernel level.
I have a program that I suspect has a permissions bug. I have checked
dmesg and nothing is said about a permissions problem. Can I count on
dmesg ALWAYS being right. Or, is there an
Note that I added a rule in 50-default.perms for /dev/usdbdev* and now
the device gets set to be owned by my local user account properly.
I'm sure there's another solution though. :-)
Ray
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
I'm running in XFCE (I boot in run-level 3 and start it with startxfce)
and when I plug in my USB camera (Canon A720), the /dev/usbdev* devices
all are set up owned by root.root with 660 permissions. This means I
can't use the device as my local user account.
I haven't yet gone
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I've just set up a new FC9 system with Samba and I'm having a problem
>
> I've set security to share, and then set up the following share
Is SELinux enabled? Have you checked for SELinux errors? Have you
reviewed the SELinux Samba booleans? I think they were in
system-conf
Gary Stainburn wrote:
I've set security to share, and then set up the following share
[reef]
comment = Reef shared folder
path = /user/remote/reef
writeable = yes
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
guest only = yes
valid users = gary
f
I've just set up a new FC9 system with Samba and I'm having a problem
I've set security to share, and then set up the following share
[reef]
comment = Reef shared folder
path = /user/remote/reef
writeable = yes
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
guest
http://rafb.net/p/CY7p2S91.html and sample code at
http://rafb.net/p/OmEu0t95.html in hope it might be of use. When
sleep(...) hit, the device file was already away. After a
ftdi_usb_find_all(...) it is still there.
>
> ...
> As for the permissions... look at configuration PolicyK
boards I have on hand.
>
> Is there anything I'm missing?
As for the permissions... look at configuration PolicyKit to change
the authorizations for serial modems
GUI in Gnome is in the menu: System->Preferences->System->Authorizations
look for the hal device access for seri
device. LibUSB's
usb_strerror() reports "could not set config 1: Operation not
permitted", LibFTDI's ftdi_get_error_string() reports "inappropriate
permissions on device!". Executing with root rights works. The failure
occurs on ftdi_usb_open
Neither chmodding nor chowni
RGH wrote:
I know vaguely how to do this, but can't find the right file: What do I
need to change so that the permissions on /dev/fw* aren't just root and
ordinary users can access e.g. the video camera? Same question for
/dev/video*.
Cheers,
rh
Hi,
You could look /etc/udev/rules.
I know vaguely how to do this, but can't find the right file: What do I
need to change so that the permissions on /dev/fw* aren't just root and
ordinary users can access e.g. the video camera? Same question for
/dev/video*.
Cheers,
rh
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@red
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 00:29 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
> There is a configuration file that is used to set the permissions
> of a list of files to the user, when that user logs in.
> Things like the audio files, possibly X11.
>
> I cant remember the name of that file, can someone
There is a configuration file that is used to set the permissions
of a list of files to the user, when that user logs in.
Things like the audio files, possibly X11.
I cant remember the name of that file, can someone help?
--
Reg.Clemens
I modified the /etc/pam.d/gdm to allow the root gui login by commenting the
user != root, and that worked, but have a strange result.
Running Systems Administration Services runs the system-config-services
program, but nothing changes.
Starting program from a terminal window also results in no
un into the
>> problem that udev I think is constantly rewriting the permissions for
>> /dev/snd
>> I've made a group audio and I've added myself to it and recursively
>> changed the group of /dev/snd/*, but next time I boot I have to do it
>> again.
>&g
Original Message
Subject: Sound card permissions
From: James Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
Date: 11/17/2008 09:28 AM
How can I make udev make /dev/snd/* group audio always?
You will need to brush
Hi,
I'm trying to run mpd and icecast under my own username but run into the
problem that udev I think is constantly rewriting the permissions for
/dev/snd
I've made a group audio and I've added myself to it and recursively
changed the group of /dev/snd/*, but next time I boot
Hi,
I'm trying to run mpd and icecast under my own username but run into the
problem that udev I think is constantly rewriting the permissions for
/dev/snd
I've made a group audio and I've added myself to it and recursively
changed the group of /dev/snd/*, but next time I boot
Rick Stevens wrote:
Nice to hear...or is it a change in GVFS?
No, FUSE hasn't changed. The GVFS filesystem remains private to the
user who mounted it.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://f
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
If -name is the first predicate, and you prune matches, find will not
need to stat() the directory entry:
Sorry, won't work for GVFS filesystem mountpoints. As soon as the
non-owner touches the inode, the error occurs.
...
Rick Stevens wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
If -name is the first predicate, and you prune matches, find will not
need to stat() the directory entry:
Sorry, won't work for GVFS filesystem mountpoints. As soon as the
non-owner touches the inode, the error occurs.
...
Note that test was on F
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
You need to tell find what to do with files not named .gvfs:
find /users/tburns -name .gvfs -prune -o -print
Will not work. As soon as the non-owner of .gvfs does a stat on the
directory, the error will be spit out. find must
Rick Stevens wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
You need to tell find what to do with files not named .gvfs:
find /users/tburns -name .gvfs -prune -o -print
Will not work. As soon as the non-owner of .gvfs does a stat on the
directory, the error will be spit out. find must "stat()" any item
it fi
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Dave Burns wrote:
man page on find -prune was not clear to me, but I tried all combos I
can think of, nothing works as I'd wish:
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo find /users/tburns -name .gvfs -prune
find: /users/tburns/.gvfs: Permission denied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo f
Dave Burns wrote:
man page on find -prune was not clear to me, but I tried all combos I
can think of, nothing works as I'd wish:
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo find /users/tburns -name .gvfs -prune
find: /users/tburns/.gvfs: Permission denied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo find /users/tburns -prun
Dave Burns wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you just skip the .gvfs items specifically, by name, with -prune?
man page on find -prune was not clear to me, but I tried all combos I
can think of, nothing works as I'd wish:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sud
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you just skip the .gvfs items specifically, by name, with -prune?
man page on find -prune was not clear to me, but I tried all combos I
can think of, nothing works as I'd wish:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo find /users/tburns
Gordon Messmer wrote:
... If you've ever seen find return results from a
directory that it wasn't told to search when using -xdev or -mount, then
that would be a bug. I've never seen find misbehave in that way, though.
Well, there you go: it works as expected now.
I should know better; "Tes
Joe Smith wrote:
Dave Burns wrote:
...
Not sure if it is a bug in find or gvfs, but -xdev and -mount do not
help with this problem.
I've never seen these options work, ever. I sure would like to know why,
or what I'm doing wrong, it would be handy to be able to use them.
That depends on wha
Dave Burns wrote:
...
Not sure if it is a bug in find or gvfs, but -xdev and -mount do not
help with this problem.
I've never seen these options work, ever. I sure would like to know why,
or what I'm doing wrong, it would be handy to be able to use them.
Can you just skip the .gvfs items spe
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 09:43 -1000, Dave Burns wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I usually throw in the -mount option to find on general principles to keep
> > it from walking into isos or nfs mounts that might be in arbitrary places
> > and explic
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I usually throw in the -mount option to find on general principles to keep
> it from walking into isos or nfs mounts that might be in arbitrary places
> and explicitly list the mount points I want if it has to span them.
No
s not
open.) Corruption? How can it be that root is denied? I wonder what
would happen if I deleted .gvfs and recreated it manually with
identical permissions?
% mount|grep gvfs
gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/poc/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon
(rw,nosuid,nodev,user=poc)
IOW .gvfs is a mount point for the
Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:34:01 -1000
Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I will probably just make a kludgey workaround - pipe error
messages to /dev/null - always fun.
My brother just sent me this email:
QUOTE:
My problem (OK - maybe just one of my problems) is tha
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does anyone know how this works and what the real solution is? (Is there a
>> real solution?)
>
> Yeah, is there any gnome setting that lets you turn gv
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how this works and what the real solution is? (Is there a
> real solution?)
Yeah, is there any gnome setting that lets you turn gvfs off or make
it act reasonable?
Dave
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-li
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:34:01 -1000
Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I will probably just make a kludgey workaround - pipe error
> messages to /dev/null - always fun.
My brother just sent me this email:
QUOTE:
My problem (OK - maybe just one of my problems) is that I can't
figure
The problem is the mount permissions/capabilities of the mount point. Try
> re-mounting with 'rw, exec, suid,' and you will probably find that 'find'
> finds what you would like found (sorry!... Could not resist).
So you're saying Rick is wrong - the callbacks are availab
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 23:17 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:10:28 -0400
> > From: Todd Denniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: OT: find command permissions: how to exc
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:10:28 -0400
From: Todd Denniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT: find command permissions: how to exclude dir?
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora."
Message-ID: &
t?
I created an identical directory with identical permissions, root and
find have no problem with that one. I think the key was mentioned by
Todd - 'the callbacks and such used when referencing it only exist in
the owner's Gnome instance.'
That was me (Rick).
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:43:09 -1000
Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... bro has no suggestion for a workaround?
>From the message he sent me the other day when he resolved the issue on his
computer:
QUOTE:
turns out that it was mounted under something...when I unmounted
directory, I cou
point?
I created an identical directory with identical permissions, root and
find have no problem with that one. I think the key was mentioned by
Todd - 'the callbacks and such used when referencing it only exist in
the owner's Gnome instance.' Which I take it to mean, when find (as
roo
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:27:32 -1000
Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a cron job that runs 'find /' as root, keeps blowing up when
> encountering ~/.gvfs in my home dir. Permissions are set like so:
My brother ran into this issue just the other day. I just a
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Rick Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Burns wrote:
>> at least give me a hint what to do or what to google for.
>
> .gvfs is a virtual filesystem and doesn't follow normal filesystem
> semantics (witness the fact the size of it is zero).
So... It is not a
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote, On 10/29/2008 07:04 PM:
(Does anyone else think .gvfs is a PITA?)
+1
And wondering how much grief it is going to cause me while administrating an
NFS|AFS|SMB server for home directories that I need to back up.
I suppose I have a little while before RHEL gets infec
No Joy.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might try the -mount (or -xdev) options to 'find', but that will
> also restrict you from crossing into other mounted filesystems.
sudo find /users/tburns/ -xdev|grep gvfs
find: /users/tburns/.gvfs: Pe
Dave Burns wrote:
I have a cron job that runs 'find /' as root, keeps blowing up when
encountering ~/.gvfs in my home dir. Permissions are set like so:
ls -la ~/.gvfs
total 4
dr-x-- 2 tburns isys0 2008-10-13 07:43 .
drwxr-xr-x 73 tburns root 4096 2008-10-24 11:49 ..
As ow
on? How can it be that root is denied? I wonder what
> would happen if I deleted .gvfs and recreated it manually with
> identical permissions?
% mount|grep gvfs
gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/poc/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon
(rw,nosuid,nodev,user=poc)
IOW .gvfs is a mount point for the FUS
I have a cron job that runs 'find /' as root, keeps blowing up when
encountering ~/.gvfs in my home dir. Permissions are set like so:
ls -la ~/.gvfs
total 4
dr-x-- 2 tburns isys0 2008-10-13 07:43 .
drwxr-xr-x 73 tburns root 4096 2008-10-24 11:49 ..
As owner of dir, no prob
for
all the system accounts as well. Also, I think that the command was
something like:
cat /etc/passwd | mksmbpasswd.sh >> /etc/samba/smbpasswd
because I don't think the output of mksmbpasswd is in the correct
for for smbpasswd. (I could be wrong.)
> Now trying to use 'smbpasswd -
gt; >>>
> >>> I want to setup a series of about a dozen folders that each have a
> >>> Samba share associated with them. Then I would like to place all of
> >>> those inside another folder that a super user can access and
> >>> conse
iated with them. Then I would like to place all of
>>> those inside another folder that a super user can access and
>>> consequently all of the lower ranking shared folders below.
>>>
>
>
>> What are the permissions of the base folder?
>
> I'
dn't
worry about that for now.
It wasn't the problem though as I can still only seem to share home
directories.
I just shared a home directory and then changed the path in smb.conf to
point to another directory that I had copied permissions from the
original. Now my client machine says the
7;t. I thought I could create the
> > super user and samba share his/her folder then create the sub folders
> > and samba share them. I then thought it would be a simple case of
> > setting the folder permissions to suit the required users but this
> > doesn't work. Th
hought it would be a simple case of setting the
> folder permissions to suit the required users but this doesn't work. There
> is obviously a bit more to it.
>
> Anyone spare a few minutes to point me in the right direction on...?
>
> 1. How to give samba access to a folder th
g and the results have clearly shown that what I
expected to be the case certainly isn't. I thought I could create the
super user and samba share his/her folder then create the sub folders and
samba share them. I then thought it would be a simple case of setting the
folder permissions t
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> Mike McCarty wrote:
>>> Having root access only gives one effective ownership, not effective
>>> permission. Being root gives one the same privileges the owner would
>>> have.
>>>
>> It gets more interesting when you have fuse mounted file systems
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
Having root access only gives one effective ownership, not effective
permission. Being root gives one the same privileges the owner would
have.
It gets more interesting when you have fuse mounted file systems. I
have an encrypted file system as us
Mike McCarty wrote:
>
> Having root access only gives one effective ownership, not effective
> permission. Being root gives one the same privileges the owner would
> have.
>
It gets more interesting when you have fuse mounted file systems. I
have an encrypted file system as user mikkel, and root
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
