On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 12:28 +, g wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> > (Basically, UTC
> > is London time with no DST adjustment, give or take a few ticks...).
>
> for me, here in cst, i have never had a problem of thinking - 6 hours f
Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 15:37 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> I thought I was the only one running Windows on GMT?
>
> And you found that works? Some time ago I looked at pages about putting
> your hardware clock on GMT, and making Windows work with that like Linux
> does. There was a lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> (Basically, UTC
> is London time with no DST adjustment, give or take a few ticks...).
for me, here in cst, i have never had a problem of thinking - 6 hours for
local time and - 5 for dst. once you do it for a while, it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Denniston wrote:
> OK, you made me look :)
well, getting blamed for something is a part of my life now.
as for problems of gmt/utc and dst, i am trying to remember if we used dst
with gmt when i was usaf. been to long.
we did have 2 clocks in
Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 15:37 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I thought I was the only one running Windows on GMT?
And you found that works? Some time ago I looked at pages about putting
your hardware clock on GMT, and making Windows work with that like Linux
does. There was a lot
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 15:37 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I thought I was the only one running Windows on GMT?
And you found that works? Some time ago I looked at pages about putting
your hardware clock on GMT, and making Windows work with that like Linux
does. There was a lot of information about
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:31 +, g wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Todd Denniston wrote:
>
> > If the machine is always running Unix/Linux, then UTC is usually better. If
> > you are also running MSWIN then you either need to use LOCAL or find the
> > tweak
>
Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> I thought I was the only one running Windows on GMT? It doesn't matter
> since it really gets booted.
>
> Bob
>
Nope - I still have a couple of things I need Windows for that will
not work under Wine. (Mainly my eBook reader and Motorola Phone
Tools.) Todd Denniston alrea
g wrote, On 08/25/2008 03:31 PM:
Todd Denniston wrote:
If the machine is always running Unix/Linux, then UTC is usually better. If
you are also running MSWIN then you either need to use LOCAL or find the tweak
someone posted ~1 week ago, that you can do to windows so it treats the
hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> what is there to tweak if you just tell msbsos that time zone
>> is london, england?
>>
>> time + 0 is time + 0.
>
> I thought I was the only one running Windows on GMT? It doesn't matter
> since it really gets booted.
my re
g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Denniston wrote:
If the machine is always running Unix/Linux, then UTC is usually better. If
you are also running MSWIN then you either need to use LOCAL or find the tweak
someone posted ~1 week ago, that you can do to windows so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Denniston wrote:
> If the machine is always running Unix/Linux, then UTC is usually better. If
> you are also running MSWIN then you either need to use LOCAL or find the
> tweak
> someone posted ~1 week ago, that you can do to windows so it t
Craig White wrote, On 08/25/2008 01:53 AM:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 22:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
crap...the clock moves ahead 7 hours when I boot Fedora ;-( that is my
offset from GMT
I need someone to toss me a bone here...
Craig
Have you checked /etc/sysconfig/c
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:33:14 -0700
Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> crap...the clock moves ahead 7 hours when I boot Fedora ;-( that is my
> offset from GMT
That sounds like fedora is the one that doesn't think the system clock
is UTC. Try running system-config-date (as root) and see if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:52:24 +
> g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> (1)scientific wild-assed guess
>> as apposed to???
>
> A regular wild-assed guess, of course.
lol.
yea.
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fence
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:52:24 +
g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (1)scientific wild-assed guess
>
> as apposed to???
A regular wild-assed guess, of course.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscrib
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 22:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > crap...the clock moves ahead 7 hours when I boot Fedora ;-( that is my
> > offset from GMT
> >
> > I need someone to toss me a bone here...
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> Have you checked /etc/sysconfig/clock?
does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Cox wrote:
> (1)scientific wild-assed guess
as apposed to???
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html.gz
'The Linux Documenta
Craig White wrote:
crap...the clock moves ahead 7 hours when I boot Fedora ;-( that is my
offset from GMT
I need someone to toss me a bone here...
Craig
Another stupid question: Is your TZ variable being set somewhere?
--Russell
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To u
Craig White wrote:
crap...the clock moves ahead 7 hours when I boot Fedora ;-( that is my
offset from GMT
I need someone to toss me a bone here...
Craig
Have you checked /etc/sysconfig/clock? How about /etc/adjtime?
--Russell
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsub
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:33:14 -0700
Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> crap...the clock moves ahead 7 hours when I boot Fedora ;-( that is my
> offset from GMT
>
> I need someone to toss me a bone here...
How about a SWAG: (1)
ntpd issue?
***
(1)scientific wild-assed guess
--
MELVILLE
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:03 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 20:59 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> > > this probably would have been clearer...
> > >
> > > # diff -s /etc/localtime /mnt/ubuntu/etc/localtime
> > > Files /etc/localtime and /mnt/ubuntu/etc/localt
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 20:59 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > this probably would have been clearer...
> >
> > # diff -s /etc/localtime /mnt/ubuntu/etc/localtime
> > Files /etc/localtime and /mnt/ubuntu/etc/localtime are identical
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> Are the times differe
Craig White wrote:
this probably would have been clearer...
# diff -s /etc/localtime /mnt/ubuntu/etc/localtime
Files /etc/localtime and /mnt/ubuntu/etc/localtime are identical
Craig
Are the times different in the hardware clock?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubs
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 03:45 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:37 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:33:58 -0700
> > Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible that one of them uses UTC and the other doesn't and how
> > > do I verify/change so
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:37 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:33:58 -0700
> Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is it possible that one of them uses UTC and the other doesn't and how
> > do I verify/change so I don't have to reset the clock each time I
> > switch?
>
> What
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:33:58 -0700
Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible that one of them uses UTC and the other doesn't and how
> do I verify/change so I don't have to reset the clock each time I
> switch?
What's your local time in relation to UTC? If one of them says that's w
I am dual booting Fedora 9 and Ubuntu 8 - it seems as though my clock
settings are different though I thought I used the same settings on both
and /etc/localtime seems to be the same on both.
Is it possible that one of them uses UTC and the other doesn't and how
do I verify/change so I don't have
28 matches
Mail list logo
