Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:06:18 +
psmith wrote:
hi kevin, i don't mean to rush you but are you any nearer to having
these built for F10?
Sorry for the delay... been busy of late. ;(
I will try and get something setup this week.
tia
phil
kevin
no
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:06:18 +
psmith wrote:
>
> hi kevin, i don't mean to rush you but are you any nearer to having
> these built for F10?
Sorry for the delay... been busy of late. ;(
I will try and get something setup this week.
> tia
> phil
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:42:25 +
phil wrote:
kevin is it major surgery to build xfce 4.6 in F10? as i've
literally >>>just finished downloading the full source tarball, (and the
graphical >>>installer in case i came up against to much problems lol)
and if it's >>>goin
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:05:52 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> F10 shouldn't be too bad.
>
> I do have a local repo here, but I haven't updated it yet to the 4.6.0
> final packages. Also, I haven't tried to rebuild all the plugins for
> F10.
>
> I can update that and let you know where the repo is if you w
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:42:25 +
phil wrote:
kevin is it major surgery to build xfce 4.6 in F10? as i've literally
just finished downloading the full source tarball, (and the graphical
installer in case i came up against to much problems lol) and if it's
going to be a ma
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> I can update that and let you know where the repo is if you want to
> test them?
>
>> phil
>
> kevin
>
I would also be willing to test.
FRank
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guideli
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:42:25 +
phil wrote:
> kevin is it major surgery to build xfce 4.6 in F10? as i've literally
> just finished downloading the full source tarball, (and the graphical
> installer in case i came up against to much problems lol) and if it's
> going to be a major hassle i'
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:53:51 -0500
Dave Feustel wrote:
xfce 4.6.0 has been announced, but it is a rather complicated package
to build and install. Will xfce 4.6.0 be available as a Fedora 9
package?
Pretty unlikely. I'm not sure all the dependencies are available there,
an
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:53:51 -0500
Dave Feustel wrote:
> xfce 4.6.0 has been announced, but it is a rather complicated package
> to build and install. Will xfce 4.6.0 be available as a Fedora 9
> package?
Pretty unlikely. I'm not sure all the dependencies are available there,
and its a pretty in
xfce 4.6.0 has been announced, but it is a rather complicated package
to build and install. Will xfce 4.6.0 be available as a Fedora 9 package?
Thanks.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedor
10 matches
Mail list logo