On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Ambrogio wrote:
Hi all,
I use yum list in a script to have everytime I need a list of package
available.
Some packages, that have long names, are displayed in 2 rows, so scripts
are more hard to be coded.
There is an option to have a more simple list of packages, less rea
Ambrogio wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 02/02/2009 alle 08.32 +, g ha scritto:
>> not 'on the monitor', but how you are set to display to monitor.
> How can I check this?
i may be wrong, but i believe in kde4, it is thru 'options'.
'options'. my bad. my thinking was crossing up with settings of fir
Ambrogio wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 02/02/2009 alle 08.32 +, g ha scritto:
>> not 'on the monitor', but how you are set to display to monitor.
> How can I check this?
currently, i am operating under scientific linux 5.4 for internet and
with f8 for 'offline' use.
i am not fully into f10, as i a
Il giorno lun, 02/02/2009 alle 08.32 +, g ha scritto:
> not 'on the monitor', but how you are set to display to monitor.
How can I check this?
> maybe. tho you may find that '80 char' is a 'default standard'.
I know this can be a standard, but I think that if one send output to a
non terminal
** in addition to my reply of Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:47:06 + **
excuse delay in sending this. i had more pressing obligations to attend to.
Ambrogio wrote:
> My monitor is 1900x800
> My konsole is set to be 196x40
should be wide enough to handle output. i would not think that a programm
a man can say in a few words, what i takes a child with a knife to do.
kafba, 'free s... licker'.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at
g bellsouth.net> writes:
> Ambrogio wrote:
>
>> I can't imagine why the limit should be set to 20 or to 80.
>
> who knows what reasoning is in thinking of yum developers?
>
> at least yum is better than rpm with rpm files. :)
>
>> I don't know how to change it, but I think that if output is s
On 02/01/2009 01:20 PM, Ambrogio wrote:
Il giorno dom, 01/02/2009 alle 13.02 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
So it *is* a bug. This is just not reasonable behaviour, and furthermore
is at odds with many other Linux tools which either a) notice when
stdout is not a terminal, or b) have a
Il giorno dom, 01/02/2009 alle 13.02 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
> So it *is* a bug. This is just not reasonable behaviour, and furthermore
> is at odds with many other Linux tools which either a) notice when
> stdout is not a terminal, or b) have a command-line option to prevent
> t
Ambrogio wrote:
> I can't imagine why the limit should be set to 20 or to 80.
who knows what reasoning is in thinking of yum developers?
at least yum is better than rpm with rpm files. :)
> I don't know how to change it, but I think that if output is sent to
> nonterminal devices, (like files o
On 02/01/2009 11:45 AM, Ambrogio wrote:
Il giorno sab, 31/01/2009 alle 14.23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
I did the same experiment with the same result. What I don't understand
is why this is a problem. If you're piping the output of "yum list" to
something else for further processin
Il giorno sab, 31/01/2009 alle 14.23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
> I did the same experiment with the same result. What I don't understand
> is why this is a problem. If you're piping the output of "yum list" to
> something else for further processing, you're getting one line of
> ou
Il giorno sab, 31/01/2009 alle 21.09 +, g ha scritto:
hmmm
I can't understand...
Why I have to set someting in terminals if I want to run the command as
a script.
> what size are your 'xterms'?
> [i have konsole set to open 80 x 25, right/left click to resize as needed]
So...
My monitor is 190
Ambrogio wrote:
> Well, I'm doing some tests and the output is very strange for me...
i can imagine.
lets get 'strange' out of way, and do some 'clarification and understanding'.
what size screen is your monitor?
[i have 18" viewable, boot w/ 'vga=794', display = 1280x1024]
what size are your
Ambrogio wrote:
I use yum list in a script to have everytime I need a list of package
available.
Some packages, that have long names, are displayed in 2 rows, so scripts
are more hard to be coded.
There is an option to have a more simple list of packages, less readable
by umans, but more reada
On 01/31/2009 12:47 PM, Ambrogio wrote:
Il giorno sab, 31/01/2009 alle 14.03 +, g ha scritto:
this is true. he did not say where he is running script. virtual vs xterm.
Well,
I'm doing some tests and the output is very strange for me...
On the same terminal (kterminal) in a very big windo
Il giorno sab, 31/01/2009 alle 14.03 +, g ha scritto:
> this is true. he did not say where he is running script. virtual vs xterm.
Well,
I'm doing some tests and the output is very strange for me...
On the same terminal (kterminal) in a very big window, if I run yum list
available I obtain a
Il giorno sab, 31/01/2009 alle 08.40 -0600, Aaron Konstam ha scritto:
> Have you tried:
> rpm -qa
Yes, but it's for packages installed, and not available
Bye
Ambrogio
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guideline
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 10:55 +0100, Ambrogio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I use yum list in a script to have everytime I need a list of package
> available.
>
> Some packages, that have long names, are displayed in 2 rows, so scripts
> are more hard to be coded.
>
> There is an option to have a more simp
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On 01/31/2009 08:03 AM, g wrote:
>> Ambrogio wrote:
>>
>>> There is an option to have a more simple list of packages, less readable
>>> by umans, but more readable by computer?
>> consider wider viewing window?
>
> He said it was a script.
this is true. he did not sa
On 01/31/2009 08:03 AM, g wrote:
Ambrogio wrote:
There is an option to have a more simple list of packages, less readable
by umans, but more readable by computer?
consider wider viewing window?
He said it was a script. The viewing window should be irrelevant.
However it looks like yum is f
Ambrogio wrote:
> There is an option to have a more simple list of packages, less readable
> by umans, but more readable by computer?
consider wider viewing window?
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give lin
Hi all,
I use yum list in a script to have everytime I need a list of package
available.
Some packages, that have long names, are displayed in 2 rows, so scripts
are more hard to be coded.
There is an option to have a more simple list of packages, less readable
by umans, but more readable by com
23 matches
Mail list logo
