Am Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:12:17 -0500
schrieb Adam Miller :
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Sebastian
> Vahl wrote:
>
> > x86_64 images (around 40 megs). The slighlty different package list
> > couldn't explain this (i.e. atlas-sse (i686) vs. atlas (x86_64) is
> > the only important difference).
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Sebastian
Vahl wrote:
> x86_64 images (around 40 megs). The slighlty different package list couldn't
> explain this (i.e. atlas-sse (i686) vs. atlas (x86_64) is the only important
> difference).
> So I've compared the sizes of the installed packages (rpm -qa --qf "
Am Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:16:07 -0500
schrieb Bruno Wolff III :
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 14:37:00 +0200,
> Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> >
> > Does anybody has an explanation for this?
> > Or can somebody try to create a x86_64 version for comparison (with
> > livecd- creator and spins-kickstarts from
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 14:37:00 +0200,
Sebastian Vahl wrote:
>
> Does anybody has an explanation for this?
> Or can somebody try to create a x86_64 version for comparison (with livecd-
> creator and spins-kickstarts from git)?
It might be multilib related. For example if you pull in wine you
Hi,
my KDE live images are showing a big size difference between the i686 and the
x86_64 images (around 40 megs). The slighlty different package list couldn't
explain this (i.e. atlas-sse (i686) vs. atlas (x86_64) is the only important
difference).
So I've compared the sizes of the installed pa
