seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 16:11 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
My concern is this is a normal occurence (needing a chroot)
Yes and no
sure looks like we'd need to make sure:
yum, mock and rpm all know how to set this up given how it would impact
chroot creation.
If we do so,
Eric Paris wrote:
So I've spent a fair bit of time the last 2 weeks trying to get
livecd-creator and an selinux enforcing machine to play nicely together.
It doesn't look like much, but from the point of view of the livecd
creator I think the following patch is all we need. Working with
rawhide
Daniel J Walsh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Well I think we need to do a couple of these to figure out the common
requirements.
I envision mock to be quite different then livecd. I think we need to
full the mock chroot to think SELinux is disabled and to do no labeling
in the chroot. This
Eric Paris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
So I've spent a fair bit of time the last 2 weeks trying to get
livecd-creator and an selinux enforcing machine to play nicely together.
It doesn't look like much, but from the point of view of the livecd
creator I think the following patch is all we need.
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 16:11 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
My concern is this is a normal occurence (needing a chroot)
Yes and no
sure looks like we'd need to make sure:
yum, mock and rpm all know how to set this up given how it would impact
chroot creation.
We may want to drop this back
