On Thursday 18 May 2006 19:54, Gain Paolo Mureddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> My point was that Fedora is not free to distribute the whole logo (text
> + image) due to the fact that the font is not open or free, which seems
> a bit strange for a FLOSS project.
>
We are completely free to redi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I still wonder why a proprietary font was used for the
logo of a project like Fedora
What font is used in a logo really does not impact the choice of other
fonts used in a layout that includes that logo. In fact, it is my
opinion that using a font in a layout that
Hi People!!!
In Brazil we are creating a project education with different focus.
We are making a survey of the available educational tools and Its
applications.
Objective:
1- create one fedora based livecd to promote the inclusion digital in
Brazil.
2 - create one fedora based livecd for ci
I still wonder why a proprietary font was used for the
logo of a project like Fedora
What font is used in a logo really does not impact the choice of other
fonts used in a layout that includes that logo. In fact, it is my
opinion that using a font in a layout that is the _same_ as the font
us
Max Spevack escribió:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
It's been a couple times now that I have sent a request for the Logo
just like what the "current" guidelines indicate, and have never got
back the said e-mail with either further instructions, questions or a
direct rejection
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
It's been a couple times now that I have sent a request for the Logo
just like what the "current" guidelines indicate, and have never got
back the said e-mail with either further instructions, questions or a
direct rejection, only silence... And i
For CD Arts and covers, take a look here:http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/CDArtCheers,Rodrigo MenezesGain Paolo Mureddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: Patrick W. Barnes escribió:> The guidelines are still under construction. If you haven't gotten > authorization, it could be that your request
Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
Patrick W. Barnes escribió:
The original font name is Bryant 2. It is available from Process Type
Foundry.
http://www.processtypefoundry.com/typefaces/bryant2/index.html
And taht's just what I simply don't get... How did the logo using this
font got approved in t
Patrick W. Barnes escribió:
The guidelines are still under construction. If you haven't gotten
authorization, it could be that your request has yet to be reviewed, or that
you have presented a usage case for which a decision has not yet been made.
In order to begin developing your graphics, y
On Thursday 18 May 2006 03:39, Gain Paolo Mureddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It's been a couple times now that I have sent a request for the Logo
> just like what the "current" guidelines indicate, and have never got
> back the said e-mail with either further instructions, questions or a
> direc
Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
*rant to self* I still wonder why a proprietary font was used for the
logo of a project like Fedora *sigh* (sorry, had to get that out of my
chest).
Fortunately, we have big images with the logo and is trivial to trace
them (Inkscape, potrace, autotrace, etc.) and
It's been a couple times now that I have sent a request for the Logo
just like what the "current" guidelines indicate, and have never got
back the said e-mail with either further instructions, questions or a
direct rejection, only silence... And i can't help but wonder, what's
the status of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
