Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/ubuntu_linux_a_threat_to_mac_o.html
...
Are we missing something? or how should I put am I missing something?
Is ubuntu that much better than fedora? If it is why is it? I know its
a personal opinion but what specifically ab
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
In my opinion Ubuntu is more targeted towards the new users, it has
many functions "dumbed" down for users, even if these
"simplifications" come at the cost of security (sudo, anyone?), and it
has also a large userbase because of this.
I wouldnt call sudo by default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wiriadisastra escribió:
> http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/ubuntu_linux_a_threat_to_mac_o.html
>
>
>
> I'm sure you will find this an interesting read. One of the things
> that I found quite interesting is that apple seems to be alive a
Apple today is not the Apple of 2004 or early, Apple now can be
considered more Microsoft like than *nix like. I agree with those that
considered to use Ubuntu instead of Apple Operating System but i think
that Mac Os X and Ubuntu are different: the first one is a multimedia
station, the second on
Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/ubuntu_linux_a_threat_to_mac_o.html
I'm sure you will find this an interesting read. One of the things that
I found quite interesting is that apple seems to be alive and well.
I personally don't know anyone that run apple comp
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/ubuntu_linux_a_threat_to_mac_o.html
I'm sure you will find this an interesting read. One of the things that
I found quite interesting is that apple seems to be alive and well.
I personally don't know anyone that run apple computers so I was
surprised by
