On 12/2/06, Gian Paolo Mureddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I still think that "just Fedora" works great, or maybe Fedora GNU/Linux
(yeah, I know, the GNU part... And sounds so much like Debian). At any
rate, why would the distribution have to change? Yes, Extras and Core
merged, but that does not
On 12/1/06, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday, 1 Dec 2006, Tejas Dinkar wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Chris Negus sent out 0.6K bytes to say:
>> Great! I was just hoping for Linux in the official name. Separate
>> distribution releases is good too.
>
> Having `Linux` in the Name is a baa
On Friday, 1 Dec 2006, Tejas Dinkar wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Chris Negus sent out 0.6K bytes to say:
>> Great! I was just hoping for Linux in the official name. Separate
>> distribution releases is good too.
>
> Having `Linux` in the Name is a baad idea.
>
> It gets the GNU guys on o
I still think that "just Fedora" works great, or maybe Fedora GNU/Linux
(yeah, I know, the GNU part... And sounds so much like Debian). At any
rate, why would the distribution have to change? Yes, Extras and Core
merged, but that does not mean that all packages will be available in
the distribu
On 12/1/06, Diego Búrigo Zacarão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm disagreement to names [debian/ubuntu]-likes. :P
I think that we must have our own way to nominate the Fedora Releases.
Something different... ;)
Maybe:
* Fedora Sever Linux 7
* Fedora GDesktop Linux 7
* Fedora KDesktop Linux 7
* Fed
I'm disagreement to names [debian/ubuntu]-likes. :P
I think that we must have our own way to nominate the Fedora Releases.
Something different... ;)
Maybe:
* Fedora Sever Linux 7
* Fedora GDesktop Linux 7
* Fedora KDesktop Linux 7
* Fedora XFDesktop Linux 7
or something like that... but not the
Tejas Dinkar wrote:
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006, Rahul Sundaram sent out 0.8K bytes to say:
We can't realistically do this. After a few releases, it would be very
difficult to remember the order of releases.
How does debian/ubuntu name stuff?
Ubuntu has release versions based on schedules and codena
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006, Rahul Sundaram sent out 0.8K bytes to say:
> We can't realistically do this. After a few releases, it would be very
> difficult to remember the order of releases.
How does debian/ubuntu name stuff?
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https
Tejas Dinkar wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Greg Dekoenigsberg sent out 2.3K bytes to say:
And maybe I buy that for Y and Z... but not for X. Because people will
say "I want Fedora Linux", and that's not going to be a sufficient answer,
because "Fedora Linux" will just be too damned big.
Why do
Le Ven 1 décembre 2006 01:19, Chris Negus a écrit :
> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:37 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Personally I'd like to name the distribution releases with "Linux", so
>> you get
>> Fedora Desktop Linux 7 (Naugahyde), Fedora Server Linux 7 (Naugahyde),
>> etc...
>>
>> A book that c
On 11/30/06, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fedora Promise
And of course... if Fedora Promise is used as a name, we can have
loads of fun complaining about when package maintainers make a mistake
and push a package build which..breaks the Promise. Aren't names with
3 or 4 contextual m
11 matches
Mail list logo
