On 03/06/07, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 22:47 -0700, Thomas Chung wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The article comes from here.
> >
> > http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/16894
> >
> > "Fedora 7, a.k.a. "Moonshine," releas
On 6/2/07, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The article comes from here.
http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/16894
"Fedora 7, a.k.a. "Moonshine," released on May 31, is an odd duck. On
the one hand, it's hugely popular. If you need to be convinced of that,
take a look at the number of
On 03/06/07, Thomas Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/2/07, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The article comes from here.
>
> http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/16894
>
> "Fedora 7, a.k.a. "Moonshine," released on May 31, is an odd duck. On
> the one hand, it's hugely popular. If
Just my two cents' worth ($0.02):
There will always be people who will not like Fedora's position on leaving
the encumbered bits out of the distribution.
To quote from the article:
"Much of this can arguably be laid to rest at the feet of Fedora's
decision to stay
completely within the bounds o
Le dimanche 03 juin 2007 à 14:06 +0300, John Babich a écrit :
> Just my two cents' worth ($0.02):
>
> There will always be people who will not like Fedora's position on leaving
> the encumbered bits out of the distribution.
However we could spin it a lot better. "Fedora does not propose
proprieta
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 13:17 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> However we could spin it a lot better. "Fedora does not propose
> proprietary software it can't provide user support for" or "Fedora
> protects its users from lawsuits" sounds a lots better than "Red Hat
> does not want to be sued" or "Fed
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 23:38 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> In the second Big Point Against Fedora is this (mis)statement:
> "Fedora doesn't even include support for read-only access to NTFS
> partitions."
> Uh, I thought we had that one resolved and did offer ro access to NTFS?
> Certainly put it int
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
On 03/06/07, Thomas Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/2/07, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The article comes from here.
>
> http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/16894
>
> "Fedora 7, a.k.a. "Moonshine," released on May 31, is an odd duck. On
> the one hand,
The additional aspect that should be added is the fact that those who
redistribute Fedora or otherwise bundle it also benefit from that
added indemnification consideration, which is a very significant aspect.
--
Bryan J Smith - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://thebs413.blogspot.com
Sent via B
Le dimanche 03 juin 2007 à 10:19 -0400, Bryan J. Smith a écrit :
> On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 13:17 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > However we could spin it a lot better. "Fedora does not propose
> > proprietary software it can't provide user support for" or "Fedora
> > protects its users from lawsuit
Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 08:16 +, Karlie Robinson wrote:
>> We've started gathering the how-to info at http://Respins.org
>
> Would you like to join in the effort upstream? [...]
+1, really
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketin
Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Here's one concept for that promo:
>
> http://linuxgrrl.com/misc/spin-promo.png
>
Ohw do I like this one! I had a good laugh when I first saw it and I'm
liking it more and more each time I show it to anyone.
How about a variant based on really pimping the distro?
Jeroen
I disagree. In fact, home users are far more picky than business users.
You can have 2 different statements that are mutually exclusive appeal
to different home users whereas businesses tend to focus on the same.
--
Bryan J Smith - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://thebs413.blogspot.com
Sent v
13 matches
Mail list logo
