Hi
A very positive review but there a number of small niggles mentioned
which I hope to respond a bit later.
Digg It:
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Impressions_of_Fedora_8
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20071119#review
"It was also the first time in years that I used a Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The conference was held with great success.
There was a great integration between the participating countries. Our
stand was very busy and also a lot of public participation in talks.
We are already planning the next event for 2008.
Photos:
Hi
German:
http://www.pro-linux.de/berichte/fedora8.html
French:
http://www.frlinux.net/?section=distributions&article=204
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
"Hi
http://distrogue.blogspot.com/2007/11/fedora-8-what-did-they-do.html
"I tried out Fedora 8 Test 3. It was atrocious. :-) It was slow,
bloated, laggy, ugly, and had bad hardware detection. But something huge
happened between the test and the final release, because Fedora 8
absolutely rock
man, 19 11 2007 kl. 20:30 +0530, skrev Rahul Sundaram:
> "Hi
>
>
> http://distrogue.blogspot.com/2007/11/fedora-8-what-did-they-do.html
>
> "I tried out Fedora 8 Test 3. It was atrocious. :-) It was slow,
> bloated, laggy, ugly, and had bad hardware detection. But something huge
> happened be
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Hi all,
A while ago some people suggested that it would be good to do some
marketing work for the stuff that goes on around Fedora the
distribution, like the web space of Fedora People...
Anybody had any thoughts on what would be a good approach to go with
this? Seeing a
John Poelstra wrote:
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Hi all,
A while ago some people suggested that it would be good to do some
marketing work for the stuff that goes on around Fedora the
distribution, like the web space of Fedora People...
Anybody had any thoughts on what would be a good approach to
