Re: Fedora Electronics Lab - Linux For You Current Issue

2008-01-20 Thread Chitlesh GOORAH
On Jan 18, 2008 2:30 PM, Mirjam Wäckerlin wrote: > I think it's in the current issue of the sister magazine "Electronics > for you" ... Hai there thanks Mirjam. Yes indeed it from Electronics For You (EFY) magazine 2008 Jan I just got a mail (see below) this morning related to that article. as

Re: Fedora Electronics Lab - Linux For You Current Issue

2008-01-20 Thread Mirjam Wäckerlin
Hey there, I just bought an online subscription for the EFY online magazine.. Now I have the definite proof that the article (about four pages) is about FEL - yay! :). It's here (only for subscribers): http://www.efymagonline.com/showme.asp?id=2014&title=A%20Complete%20Lab%20of%20Electronics%20Too

Fedora 9 name

2008-01-20 Thread Satyajit Ranjeev
Hi all, I do agree with a lot of others about the names regarding the new fedora release. How about we have an option wherein we add names we like and others can vote on the names or add their choice. The final one probably could be the one with the most number of votes. Satyajit signature.asc

Re: Fedora 9 name

2008-01-20 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:49:01 +0530 Satyajit Ranjeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do agree with a lot of others about the names regarding the new > fedora release. How about we have an option wherein we add names we > like and others can vote on the names or add their choice. The final > one prob

Re: Fedora 9 name

2008-01-20 Thread Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 for include more names in the list! Satyajit Ranjeev escreveu: | Hi all, | | I do agree with a lot of others about the names regarding the new fedora | release. How about we have an option wherein we add names we like and | others can vote on the

Re: Res: Fedora 9

2008-01-20 Thread Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Juan Camilo Prada escreveu: | | | On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 05:55 -0800, Henrique de Castro wrote: |> Here in Brazil (and I bet that in all Latin countries) the choice of |> this codenames have caused a negative reaction even in the more |> enthusiast