Chad Bloem wrote:
Fedora,
I was looking at the Fedora WIKI page and I stumbled across the
information regarding the need for a mascot. It mentioned that they
wanted an animal design wrapped into the current icon. I slapped
together an idea. Máirín Duffy was kind enough to suggest Inkscape (ha
Dimitris Glezos wrote:
I saw this today:
http://people.mozilla.com/~jscott/devcp/latest/
It's a stats dashboard, showing a high level picture of the project
growth, which versions are used out there etc. Basically it's
something like smolt, but targeted to users/marketing, more like our
own m
On Feb 8, 2008 12:07 PM, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> What do folks think about this idea?
>>
>> fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a separate
>> domain would be more focused towards uses of the project's output,
>>
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What do folks think about this idea?
fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a separate
domain would be more focused towards uses of the project's output,
Fedora the linux distro itself?
would something l
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
It's a stats dashboard, showing a high level picture of the project
growth, which versions are used out there etc. Basically it's
something like smolt, but targeted to users/marketing, more like our
own manually-created fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistic
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
I'm not afraid of dividing traffic, I'm afraid of shallow traffic...
people who hit an entry point and lose interest quickly because the
page has the wrong information and get bored... or too much
information and they get lost.
So all this "website" talk
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 11:24 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Any interest in knocking out some answers to the following questions?
>
> > (1) Who is our target audience?
> > (2) What are the goals of our target audience?
> > (3) What are our goals?
>
Im starting to think that my replays are not b
Máirín Duffy wrote:
ubuntu has:
ubuntuforums.org
fridge.ubuntu.com
shop.canonical.com
wiki.ubuntu.com
a separate domain for almost every 'spin' - kubuntu.org, edubuntu.org, etc.
let's not forget launchpad.net too.
~m
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
http
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:55:34 +0100
Elio Tondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> would something like fedoralinux.org work?
> >
> > Or usefedora.org or getfedora.org. Sure.
> >
> > I like the idea of a purely user-focused website.
>
> +1
>
> I would prefer fedoralinux.org.
I would have some
getfedora.org +1
2008/2/8, Elio Tondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> >
> >> What do folks think about this idea?
> >>
> >> fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a separate
> >> domain would be more focused tow
Elio Tondo wrote:
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What do folks think about this idea?
fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a separate
domain would be more focused towards uses of the project's output,
Fedora the linux distro itself?
On Feb 8, 2008 9:02 AM, John Poelstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely! Turning off yum-updatesd is part of my rebuild script for
> new installs for the reason you've stated. I hate it :)
So... can we have a heartbeat process that isn't tied to update questing?
-jef
--
Fedora-marketing
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 9:02 AM, John Poelstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutely! Turning off yum-updatesd is part of my rebuild script for
new installs for the reason you've stated. I hate it :)
So... can we have a heartbeat process that isn't tied to upda
Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 1:32 PM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For some historical background, the fpo site was such a link farm (or
landing page, either one is bad I think) with six links on it. It didn't
work well and the domain was eventually changed to point directly
>From: Max Spevack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: separate fpo domain? (was Re: making the website better)
>To: For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base
>
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Rahul is right -- an in
I think it'd be possible to divide the current fp.o url into the
specific parts, it would just include 1 more click. Perhaps on the root
domain, we sort of wipe it clean and provide 3 major links: "For
Developers", "For Users", "For Community Members" or whatever audiences
we've determined. The
Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 12:42 PM, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the problem we want to solve... too much information to dissiminate.
Yes, we have a lot of information to disseminate to largely different
audiences. I agree with that point.
Putting this informati
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 12:07 PM, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What do folks think about this idea?
fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a
separate domain would be more focused towards
As i said in another post, I'm working on adding a news section to
fp.org, so i would like to know what you people think it would be good
to add as a feeder. I already though about fedora weekly news. So is
there any other fedora-related news/article/whatever feed??
--
Fedora-marketing-list maili
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
I'm not afraid of dividing traffic, I'm afraid of shallow traffic...
people who hit an entry point and lose interest quickly because the
page has the wrong information and get bored... or too much
information and they get lost.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What do folks think about this idea?
fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a separate domain
would be more focused towards uses of the project's output, Fedora the linux
distro itself?
would something like fedoralinux.org work?
Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
As i said in another post, I'm working on adding a news section to
fp.org, so i would like to know what you people think it would be good
to add as a feeder. I already though about fedora weekly news. So is
there any other fedora-related news/article/whatever feed??
You
On Feb 8, 2008 12:42 PM, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the problem we want to solve... too much information to dissiminate.
Yes, we have a lot of information to disseminate to largely different
audiences. I agree with that point.
Putting this information at different domain na
What do folks think about this idea?
fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a separate
domain would be more focused towards uses of the project's output,
Fedora the linux distro itself?
would something like fedoralinux.org work?
Or are we barking up the wrong tree?
~m
E
On 08/02/2008, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd volunteer a few dozen KK doughnuts to anyone who can take a lead
> role in channeling the energy on fedora-list into a steady rising
> pressure of activism, engineered to explode on release day. I hate
> people, so I know it won't be me.
On Feb 8, 2008 12:23 PM, Juan Camilo Prada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As i said in another post, I'm working on adding a news section to
> fp.org, so i would like to know what you people think it would be good
> to add as a feeder. I already though about fedora weekly news. So is
> there any othe
Jeff Spaleta said the following on 02/07/2008 11:21 PM Pacific Time:
I also personally think people are still turning off yum-updatesd out
of ingrained habit.
yum-updatesd is the closest thing to what mozilla has in terms of a
heartbeat. Unfortunately yum-updatesd continues to get in the way of
On Feb 8, 2008 8:25 AM, Jeffrey Tadlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By bringing people into the Fedora community through a main landing
> page it should also make messaging to the community a little easier,
> as we would have one main place to put that special banner announcing
> the upcoming FudC
Any interest in knocking out some answers to the following questions?
> (1) Who is our target audience?
> (2) What are the goals of our target audience?
> (3) What are our goals?
Máirín Duffy wrote:
- Who is the audience for these pages? Who is NOT the audience for these
pages?
1- Windows and
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 8:25 AM, Jeffrey Tadlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By bringing people into the Fedora community through a main landing
page it should also make messaging to the community a little easier,
as we would have one main place to put that special banner announcing
th
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 04:04 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
> > As i said in another post, I'm working on adding a news section to
> > fp.org, so i would like to know what you people think it would be good
> > to add as a feeder. I already though about fedora weekly news. S
Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 11:24 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Any interest in knocking out some answers to the following questions?
> (1) Who is our target audience?
> (2) What are the goals of our target audience?
> (3) What are our goals?
Im starting to think that my r
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Elio Tondo wrote:
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What do folks think about this idea?
fedoraproject.org being the website for the PROJECT, while a
separate domain would be more focused towards uses of the project's
output, Fedora th
Michael Beckwith wrote:
I think it'd be possible to divide the current fp.o url into the
specific parts, it would just include 1 more click. Perhaps on the root
domain, we sort of wipe it clean and provide 3 major links: "For
Developers", "For Users", "For Community Members" or whatever audien
On Feb 8, 2008 11:04 AM, Jonathan Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short list:
>
> 1) Digg (or submit to whatever your favorite news site is - Karsten's
> suggestion of one item a week from the bits that crop up on
> f-marketing-l seems like it would be quite a good start)
Can't we just drop t
On Feb 8, 2008 1:32 PM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some historical background, the fpo site was such a link farm (or
> landing page, either one is bad I think) with six links on it. It didn't
> work well and the domain was eventually changed to point directly to the
> wiki. See:
Hey Juan,
Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
BTW, Máirín, i'd like to know if i might have access to the designs you
made for the Spins website. I want to work a bit about making the spins
more noticeable. Also I'm already working on fp.org by adding a news
section with the Fedora weekly news RSS.
So I
On Feb 8, 2008 9:32 AM, Greg DeKoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should be easy to get into F9 if we decide to do it -- but you're looking
> at a board-level decision, I think. Fortunately, Jeff, you're on the
> board. Also, you're extremely persuasive. Threaten a robotic telescope
> fili
On Feb 8, 2008 2:39 PM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh I didn't mean to say you were, sorry about that. I meant to show them
> as an example of what I think people are thinking when you're talking
> about a central point of contact.
No wonder people thought I was nuts then!
> I d
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 19:39 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hey Juan,
>
> Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
> > BTW, Máirín, i'd like to know if i might have access to the designs you
> > made for the Spins website. I want to work a bit about making the spins
> > more noticeable. Also I'm already working on
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 8:32 AM, Dimitris Glezos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like something we'd like to have as well for Fedora?
What I want...what I really really want is a very simple heartbeat
that is on for all fedora clients by default.. that does NOT get in
the way o
Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
As i said in another post, I'm working on adding a news section to
fp.org, so i would like to know what you people think it would be good
to add as a feeder. I already though about fedora weekly news. So is
there any other fedora-related news/article/whatever feed??
Oh
On Feb 8, 2008 4:31 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about smolt only submitting the hardware data if the user chooses to
> do so, and otherwise just getting it's uuid in the database, instead of
> letting the user disable it entirely?
Smolt right now isn't a heartbeat... i
Hi folks,
I've updated the posters using the color suggestions from John Adams and
the text Paul Frields gave me in my blog [1] (with one minor mod) and
some layout suggestions from Robin Norwood in IRC (the original design
had the infinity sign flattened, it's readjusted to resemble its
posi
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 19:39 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> So I saw your RSS stuff - awesome work!
>
> Here are the spins mocks with SVG source:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Spins
>
> ~m
>
I played with the mocks a little bit and i got something to show, the
post is already in the
45 matches
Mail list logo
