Yes, we did discuss in one of the meetings a few weeks ago.
No, I don't know of an update. I'll ask around.
Cheers.
In the mean time I'd like to suggest that we set up a wordpress.com
blog and use that to begin writing content that would appear on
news.fp.o.
I know we'll get there
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy project or a
Fedora LTS.
The brazilian government, one of the
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy project or a
Fedora LTS.
The
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy project or a
Fedora LTS.
There is a Fedora LTS. It's called
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:42 -0300, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the project, particularly the creation
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy project or a
Fedora LTS.
Ola Rodrigo
El vie, 10-10-2008 a las 10:51 -0300, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira
escribió:
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to
+1
--
Kam
http://kamsalisbury.com
GPG key: FAF1751E
-Original Message-
From: Steven Moix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora
Date: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:27 am
Size: 974 bytes
To: For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:51 -0300, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
So, we are working here to recommend Red Hat and CENTOS ??
That's the question, Ubuntu has a LTS, Fedora don't! That's the main
problem of the Fedora Project.
Today, we have many users! With this idea to recommend Centos
I am hesitant to use the word reccommend concerning a specific operating
system. Educate is a better word when the focus is about choice.
Everyone is different and likewise their solutions to technology problems will
be different. it should be our first goal, when discussing Linux, to educate
Kam escreveu:
+1
--
Kam
http://kamsalisbury.com
GPG key: FAF1751E
-Original Message-
From: Steven Moix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora
Date: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:27 am
Size: 974 bytes
To: For discussions about marketing and expanding
On Ven, 10 Ottobre 2008 4:27 pm, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
because is impossible to migrate every year to other Fedora Release.
With the short time support is impossible to work and use Fedora.
I don't understand the problem...for LTS there is RHEL ;-)
I Like this slogan:
Fedora is
Andrea Modesto Rossi escreveu:
I don't understand the problem...for LTS there is RHEL ;-)
I Like this slogan:
Fedora is the best of today, RHEL is the best of the following seven
years.
Best Regards,
Ok. Put this message on the Fedora Official website.
For me, it's a bad argument and
Andrea Modesto Rossi escreveu:
I don't understand the problem...for LTS there is RHEL ;-)
I Like this slogan:
Fedora is the best of today, RHEL is the best of the following seven
years.
Best Regards,
Ok. Put this message on the Fedora Official website.
For me, it's a bad argument and
SERPRO (Brazilian Government IT Department) has more than 9.000 desktops
running Fedora (in all brazilian states) and now is migrating to Ubuntu,
because is impossible to migrate every year to other Fedora Release.
With the short time support is impossible to work and use Fedora.
If I have to
+1
Luis Felipe Marzagao/Yahoo escreveu:
I think Fedora is great distro, which is why I´m involved with it (of
course...).
But sometimes it's *really* disappointing to see how people in Fedora
always seem to resit changes... So what there's RHEL and CentOS? So what
the Fedora purpose is to
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Steven Moix wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:42 -0300, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
Or maybe you didn't really understand the goal of the Fedora Project.
Once again, Fedora is not about conquering the desktop / server market.
It's about developping / building / creating / innovating / revolutionning
the future of the desktop / server FOSS
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1 This
is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy project or a
Fedora LTS.
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
Andrea Modesto Rossi escreveu:
I don't understand the problem...for LTS there is RHEL ;-)
I Like this slogan:
Fedora is the best of today, RHEL is the best of the following seven
years.
Best Regards,
Ok. Put this message on the Fedora Official website.
I know what is Fedora and I understand the GOAL of the project, i'm here
since 2005.
Try to think about this in terms of free software, not distro v distro.
For me, I use and contribute to Fedora because I care about freedom,
want to help drive freedom forward and believe Fedora is the best
Reopen the Legacy project would be great!
But, we need to use the same infra and repositories of Fedora Project.
That's the problem IMHO.
If the Legacy project will be a official project i can work HARD to
recruit people to work in LATAM.
So, that's is the question. Can we maintain Fedora
Jonathan Roberts escreveu:
I know what is Fedora and I understand the GOAL of the project, i'm here
since 2005.
Try to think about this in terms of free software, not distro v distro.
For me, I use and contribute to Fedora because I care about freedom,
want to help drive freedom forward
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
Or maybe you didn't really understand the goal of the Fedora Project.
Once again, Fedora is not about conquering the desktop / server market.
It's about developping / building / creating / innovating /
revolutionning
Seems to me, a new project has to be established.
After Fedora 10 is released, let's find Fedora Programmers willing to tweak
Fedora some more, rename it something else but add a LTS at the end for long
term support, then release that into the public arena. If those who need
RHEL support, can
With the economy on the brink of recession, LINUX could save the day for
everyone needing a reliable Operating System! We need to reach out to
Windoze/Mac Users who haven't taken the plunge yet.
What can we do to lure them in?
Markus McLaughlin
linuxglobe.wordpress.com
Hudson, MA
--
Yes, it´s pretty clear... Of course we can do whatever we want If I
want to open the Space Monkeys Fedora project I could.. But that´s not
the point here.
We are talking about wheter or not the Fedora board is willing to
sponsor this idea.
Since we saw the creation of CentOS, I assume
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrea Modesto Rossi escreveu:
I don't understand the problem...for LTS there is RHEL ;-)
I Like this slogan:
Fedora is the best of today, RHEL is the best of the following seven
years.
Best Regards,
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 11:57 -0300, Luis Felipe Marzagao/Yahoo wrote:
But sometimes it's *really* disappointing to see how people in Fedora
always seem to resit changes... So what there's RHEL and CentOS? So what
the Fedora purpose is to be a lab?!
Why can´t it be changed?
What are *YOU*
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:52:11 -0300, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but we can BE BETTER, only adding more 1 year of updates to the
packages!! With this improvement on the project the number of
users/collaborators will increase!!
It's good for fedora, for red hat,
2008/10/10 Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Guys!
Read this bad news:
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1
This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Luis Felipe Marzagao/Yahoo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it´s pretty clear... Of course we can do whatever we want If I want
to open the Space Monkeys Fedora project I could.. But that´s not the
point here.
We are talking about wheter or not the Fedora
Luis Felipe Marzagao/Yahoo wrote:
Yes, it´s pretty clear... Of course we can do whatever we want If I
want to open the Space Monkeys Fedora project I could.. But that´s not
the point here.
You will have to call it something else otherwise it would be a
trademark violation ;-)
We are
Rahul Sundaram escreveu:
Luis Felipe Marzagao/Yahoo wrote:
Yes, it´s pretty clear... Of course we can do whatever we want If
I want to open the Space Monkeys Fedora project I could.. But that´s
not the point here.
You will have to call it something else otherwise it would be a
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
In 2009 my main goal at the Fedora Project in latin america will be
recruit people to the packaging project.
Very nice.
Increasing the number of people involved in this project we will can
think in the Legacy project more efficiently.
True, increasing the
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
In 2009 my main goal at the Fedora Project in latin america will be
recruit people to the packaging project.
Very nice.
+1 Count me in, Man
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 13:48 -0300, Luis Felipe Marzagao/Yahoo wrote:
Anyway, my point is such idea should be at Fedora goals. Everything that
drivers people away from Fedora should be considered, re-thought and,
maybe, re-implemented.
Rule number one of demagoguery: you CANNOT please
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Steven Moix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real and simple answer to this LTS problem would be for RedHat to offer
RHEL workstation for free (yes, the killed product), without support. The
maintenance effort has already been made for RHEL and you are not losing
I agree with Steven, something has to be done, or else Ubuntu takes over,
period!
Markus
linuxglobe.wordpress.com
Hudson, MA
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 08:22:24PM -0400, Markus McLaughlin wrote:
I agree with Steven, something has to be done, or else Ubuntu takes over,
period!
We don't have a clue what you're agreeing to. It's generally considered
mailing list etiquette to both
1) if you subscribe to list digests,
I have read a couple of news regarding this topic. I found clear leave
RHEL favouring a free distro. I was crystal clear to me using only one
distro makes things easy. What I fail to find in the news is a
technical reason to drop all RHEL and make standar Fedora, as they
should be good at with the
Hi,
I'm relatively new, and I have been only using fedora for about 4
years. All these years I have used fedora, I had fun. In the beginning I
was excited a new version released every 6 months. I moved into systems
administration and realized the need of a very stable system. Recent
Satyajit Ranjeev wrote:
Its just an idea, what about having a long term support for just the
even releases or a yearly release of an official fedora spin just
catering to servers.
A spin catering for servers is easy to do but without a longer lifecycle
does it make sense?
43 matches
Mail list logo
