any really good arguments in the article above... why a power
user, gamer or newbie would want to choose fedora instead debian (the
headline claims best linux distro but in the end it seems to be a
fedora vs debian thingie)
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
:D
http://www.techradar.com/news/software
@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
the way it is now though it looks very professional and polished.
(sure a subjective taste question)
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
interested.
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
#fedora-nightlife on irc.freenode.net is open :D
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
#fedora-nightlife on irc.freenode.net is open for business
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
a production server with fedora then fine... there are enough
alternatives better suited for the task. just proposing that fedora
should be yet another distribution that moves very slowly (there are
enough of those available) isnt very productive.
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
That is the problem! Year
. with
distcc...) wouldnt it be still based on fedora from a pure technical
point of view?
How would i be able to call that live cd then?
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
-jef
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing
2006/4/20, Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:03 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
but just a question... what if i add a single package that isnt yet in
extras nor core... am i not allowed to call it based on fedora with
only minor changes that are documented in a clean way
proprietary packages, from another which includes free
packages that are not in Fedora or Fedora Extras?
Thanks,
Andre
well that was exactly my question... what terms are legal... i am
neither a lawyer nor do i want to consult one at this point :).
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
Fedora-marketing
2006/4/20, Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:19 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
but its still derived from fedora isnt it? distcc is hanging idle in
bugzilla for ages :)
someone finish the review.
No, because (as Max forgot to mention) the Based on Fedora must
2006/3/21, Filip Tsachev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-jef
sample flyer
Interested in learning about Fedora Linux?
Are you a HOT chick?
Then contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for personal lessons on using Fedora
/sample flyer
spaleta
That almost killed me :D. Seriously Jef, start publishing those
11 matches
Mail list logo
