Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 10:14 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:25 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >
> > While we are at the topic already: This fact was badly communicated.
> > There seems to be a whole lot of confusion about the current Fedora
>
edhat.com?
> >
> The schedule page already shows the current release schedule. The next
> schedule is undecided at this point
And that's part of the problem IMHO.
CU
thl
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >>>>Developers have been
> >>>>communicating that this release cycle was only for FC5 for quite a wh
ttp://fedora.redhat.com/About/schedule/
would suffice IMHO. A long term plan would even be better.
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
malig
gewesen sein kann, da FC4 auch schon später raus kam"
---
Roughly translated:
---
I read there: "For Fedora Core 6, we should be going back to the more
regular 6-ish months." Thus rather less surely. Let's wait what
follows, particularly since that cannot have been uni
Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 15:31 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 05:23 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >>[...]
> >>A few comments for more information. The switch to a prolonged
> >>development cycle fo
archives of fedora-maintainers or fedora-devel -- I tried to find
it, but gave up after 10 minutes
[*2] -- Gnome releases every 6 month. RHEL releases round about every 18
Months, so a Fedora release every 6 month would probably fit with the
goals for Red Hat, too.
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL
uot; to the name of these lists:
fedora-desktop-list
fedora-tools-list
fedora-config-list
No, this is not important, but it avoids confusion for the users. With
"devel" in the name it's obvious that this is for devel discussions.
Yes, there will still be people that don't get it
Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2005, 17:25 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >Could someone tell the author that this is not correct? This argument is
> >so old and still wrong -- someone with a deep knowledge on the subject
> >should write down the truth* into the wiki so we can point people to it.
> >
>
Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2005, 16:42 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Orielly Linux Desktop Pocket Guide has a freely available chapter on
> Linux distributions with a breif introduction to Fedora and a comparison
> with a few others. Take a look at it.
>
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/linuxdesk
hough. :-P
Side note: We also need a better Web-Site navigation IMHO -- a sidebar
similar to the one on http://fedora.redhat.com/ (or something like that)
would be very helpful. Even I sometimes can't find information in the
wiki even if I know they are there somewhere.
Just my 2 cent.
www.fedorausers.org/ and are there
technically things planed to get this a multi-language site from the
start? Do wee need that web-page if we have the faq in the wiki?
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 21.09.2005, 20:17 +0530 sc
ir own localized
fedora-wiki already, for example
http://fedorawiki.de
/me runs, because I'm *not* volunteering to help getting this realized
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
