Hi,
Someone should write a response. Feel free to brainstorm here.
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20080519mode=67#news
Fedora 9 was released last week. As many users have discovered since
then, the latest version of Red Hat's community distribution is a rather
adventurous mix of
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
Someone should write a response. Feel free to brainstorm here.
Dear Distrowatch, you're completely correct in your analysis.
I mean, aren't they? I'm not sure what kind of response is required.
--g
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
Someone should write a response. Feel free to brainstorm here.
Dear Distrowatch, you're completely correct in your analysis.
I mean, aren't they? I'm not sure what kind of response is required.
. If you are a
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 19:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
Someone should write a response. Feel free to brainstorm here.
Dear Distrowatch, you're completely correct in your analysis.
I mean, aren't they?
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
. If you are a Fedora fan, but would prefer your Linux desktop to have
fewer experimental software packages, you might want to postpone the
upgrade for a month or two, or investigate one of the distributions with
a policy of shipping stable and
Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
It doesnt really implies that, it only means that fedora is bleeding
edge, which doesnt mean we dont test our packages.
We have to disagree on what that means. There are good reason for us
providing a pre-release of Xorg for example. Those choices can still be
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Absolutely. We make a pretty big effort on testing what we ship however and
that should still be recognized.
.
Recognized? Sure. But we *cannot* simply sit back and rest on our
laurels of producing a quality
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
. If you are a Fedora fan, but would prefer your Linux desktop to have
fewer experimental software packages, you might want to postpone the upgrade
for a month or two, or investigate one of the
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Side note about this... Does anyone know if we have a public list of what
our test matrix is? I'd be happy to test and sign off on some things but
I don't know what we do to test.
Sure thing -
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
Side note about this... Does anyone know if we have a public list of what
our test matrix is? I'd be happy to test and sign off on some things but
I don't know what we do to test.
Jon Stanley. Paging Jon Stanley. :)
I don't think we have one.
I
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Side note about this... Does anyone know if we have a public list of what
our test matrix is? I'd be happy to test and sign off on some things but
I don't know what we do to
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
Side note about this... Does anyone know if we have a public list of what
our test matrix is? I'd be happy to test and sign off on some things but
I don't know what we do to test.
Jon Stanley. Paging
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Greg DeKoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TreeTestingTemplate
As with a lot of things on the wiki, this is out of date :( We're
going with the matrices that have spots for folks to put their names,
etc.
--
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Side note about this... Does anyone know if we have a public list of what
our test matrix is? I'd be happy to test and sign
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Greg DeKoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look, we're getting *really* favorable coverage for F9. I expect that
coverage will continue. I think this is a case of taking criticism
graciously, admitting our imperfections, and working to do better next time.
15 matches
Mail list logo
