Hi,
http://www.linux.com/feature/135102
Digg It:
http://digg.com/linux_unix/New_Fedora_9_makes_waves_by_emphasizing_contributors
"The Fedora distribution has a reputation for innovation, and the new
Fedora 9, released today, is no exception. With features that range from
easy filesystem enc
that do not wish
> to become contributors. The two main "issues" seem to be:
> * Excessive bureaucracy (I somewhat agree).
> * CLA.
And I've been around Debian as a maintainer long enough to hear similar
complaints of its system. And part of Debian's system is a "Demo
have not. I take your word for it. And yes, the
GPL might be seen as a "draconian" license for that very matter. I'm
just saying what I've seen, read and heard from people that do not wish
to become contributors. The two main "issues" seem to be:
* Excessive bureauc
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 23:24 -0500, Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
> Another common issue seems to be the CLA, some
> really see it as an evil requirement... like they'd be renouncing the
> right to claim something their own (I certainly don't understand it that
> way, but it could easily be misinterp
Rahul Sundaram escribió:
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
Couldn't agree more... Fedora seems to have too much "bureaucracy"
for contributors to, well, contribute. Some might say that it is
standard bureaucracy, but still quite cumbersome at times. Not that
it is difficult,
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
Couldn't agree more... Fedora seems to have too much "bureaucracy" for
contributors to, well, contribute. Some might say that it is standard
bureaucracy, but still quite cumbersome at times. Not that it is
difficult, just messy and cumbersome at tim
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 11/7/06, Rahul Sundaram < hidden > wrote:
Ideologically that divisiveness between Linux users is bad. Practically,
none of the distributions have enough market enough to be worth it
compared to Windows or even better people who havent used computers yet.
I was not tal
On 11/7/06, Rahul Sundaram < hidden > wrote:
Ideologically that divisiveness between Linux users is bad. Practically,
none of the distributions have enough market enough to be worth it
compared to Windows or even better people who havent used computers yet.
I was not talking about division, but
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Hello there,
Like many of you have seen in many mailing lists, suse/opensuse users
and contributors are disgusted.
Here, these users/contributors are mostly pro-kde, it's normal because
it's suse. However some/these contributors are in search of another
Maxime Carron wrote:
Some KDE users have left Fedora, because fedora was including a too old
KDE.
The second point is : KDE is 1 block on fedora. Just few big packages.
KDE-base, KDE-network, includes most of the basic applications
(konqueror, kopete, konversation, ...)
KDE makes releases as al
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 11:36 -0600, Chris Negus wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 08:13 +, Karlie Robinson wrote:
> > did you all see this about suse?
> >
> > Microsoft backs Novell's Linux platform
> > http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/11/03/microsoft.novell.ap/index.html
>
> If this is the first t
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 08:13 +, Karlie Robinson wrote:
> did you all see this about suse?
>
> Microsoft backs Novell's Linux platform
> http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/11/03/microsoft.novell.ap/index.html
If this is the first time seeing this, you should check out Red Hat's
responses here:
htt
did you all see this about suse?
Microsoft backs Novell's Linux platform
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/11/03/microsoft.novell.ap/index.html
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Thomas Canniot wrote:
Le samedi 04 novembre 2006 à 21:29 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Maxime Carron wrote:
Some KDE users have left Fedora, because fedora was including a too old
KDE.
Can you be more specific? What version of Fedora didnt include the
latest KDE at that time?
The second p
On 11/4/06, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maxime Carron wrote:
> Some KDE users have left Fedora, because fedora was including a too old
> KDE.
Can you be more specific? What version of Fedora didnt include the
latest KDE at that time?
> The second point is : KDE is 1 block on fedor
Le samedi 04 novembre 2006 à 21:29 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Maxime Carron wrote:
> > Some KDE users have left Fedora, because fedora was including a too old
> > KDE.
>
> Can you be more specific? What version of Fedora didnt include the
> latest KDE at that time?
>
> > The second point
Maxime Carron wrote:
Some KDE users have left Fedora, because fedora was including a too old
KDE.
Can you be more specific? What version of Fedora didnt include the
latest KDE at that time?
The second point is : KDE is 1 block on fedora. Just few big packages.
KDE-base, KDE-network, include
suse users
> and contributors are disgusted.
>
> Here, these users/contributors are mostly pro-kde, it's normal because
> it's suse. However some/these contributors are in search of another
> distro who supports KDE.
>
> Since Fedora Project already started working on Unleas
Hello there,
Like many of you have seen in many mailing lists, suse/opensuse users
and contributors are disgusted.
Here, these users/contributors are mostly pro-kde, it's normal because
it's suse. However some/these contributors are in search of another
distro who supports KDE.
Si
wiki completely.
The Account System is already able to generate lists of contributors in a
particular group, but those lists currently yield too much information to
publish openly and are rendered without any style. We're making progress
towards an Account System rewrite, and this is certai
On 7/2/06, Damien Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas, if you have the time, could explain to me the process for generate a
list with the fedora account system? I would like apply this for all Fedora
Project, without ambassador.
Personally, I feel the list should be maintained by each proj
Thomas, if you have the time, could explain to me the process for generate a list with the fedora account system? I would like apply this for all Fedora Project, without ambassador.2006/7/2, Thomas Chung <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:On 7/2/06, Rahul Sundaram <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I think we should d
On 7/2/06, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should derive this list automatically from the account system
rather than try and maintain it manually in the wiki.
Rahul
Yes, we should use Fedora Account System.
I'm already in the process of doing so for Fedora Ambassadors.
htt
Damien Durand wrote:
I think of making a similar thing, I'll create the wiki pages about this.
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Contributors
I think we should derive this list automatically from the account system
rather than try and maintain it manually in the wiki.
Rahul
--
F
m.org/showthread.php?p=562114#post562114
)> brings in the point that we dont have a list of contributors easily> accessible. Any ideas on how to tackle this?>> RahulIn the thread, he's referring to
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/staff-core.htmlWe ha
On 7/1/06, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This thread
(http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=562114#post562114)
brings in the point that we dont have a list of contributors easily
accessible. Any ideas on how to tackle this?
Rahul
In the thread, he's referr
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> This thread
> (http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=562114#post562114)
> brings in the point that we dont have a list of contributors easily
> accessible. Any ideas on how to tackle this?
A list shouldn't
Hi
This thread
(http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=562114#post562114)
brings in the point that we dont have a list of contributors easily
accessible. Any ideas on how to tackle this?
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 12:54 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote:
> Please take the time to at least visit
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/MarketingGroup and make sure
> that your name is present. If not, please add it. If you do not yet
> have write access to the wiki, let us know and we'll get
I have largely redone the Marketing section of the wiki. We have
several new pages, a different layout on some existing content, and a
bunch of cleaning up. I encourage everyone to take a look, try things
out, and make any changes they feel are necessary.
Please take the time to at least visit
h
30 matches
Mail list logo
