Hi,
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/05/hats_off_for_fe.html
"It's not about which window manager to use, or even the code itself,
since the vast majority of what's in any given Linux distribution is all
the same code. It's about the choices made by the folks who package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten Wade escribió:
> On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:53 -0500, Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
>
>> If anything about Fedora I do not agree with (keep in mind I'm a
>> die-hard-supporter and fan of the distribution) is precisely the name.
>> Not because of anyt
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:53 -0500, Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
> If anything about Fedora I do not agree with (keep in mind I'm a
> die-hard-supporter and fan of the distribution) is precisely the name.
> Not because of anything else, but because Red Hat *deliberately*
> depleted the word of meaning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten Wade escribió:
>
> I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for
> Ambassadors. That is something that is hard to make a rule. For
> example, I attend Bay Area Linux events as an Ambassador and as a Red
> Hat associ
uss this again?
> >>
> >>> Trust me, i have recent and respectfull sources who said they think
> >>> like
> >>> i do.
> >>
> >> I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for
> >> Ambassadors
;>> like
>>> i do.
>>
>> I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for
>> Ambassadors.
>
> As for as I know, it's not only red hats but hats in general.
>
> "... that we not connect hats, red in colo
maybe have to discuss this again.
Sorry, why is that a reason to discuss this again?
Trust me, i have recent and respectfull sources who said they think like
i do.
I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for
Ambassadors.
As for as I know, it's n
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:55 +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
> > Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit :
>
> > Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL
> > and Fedora
>
> This is why i said we maybe ha
have you guys ever considered something like transferes?
This company sells the same type of product that places like Cafe Press
use. http://www.dharmatrading.com/transfers/
They even have the blank shirts and such at
http://www.dharmatrading.com/clothing/
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juan Rodriguez escribió:
> As an Ambassador for Fedora here in Mexico, I'd definitely be
> interested in buying 'batches' of stuff to redistribute. I checked
> at Red Hat, and their shipping costs avg around 59 dlls, so its out
> of my budget.
> --
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 12:23 +0200 schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen:
> Can this probably endless discussion please stop now or be taken offline?
>
^^
well spoken my dutch friend!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fed
Can this probably endless discussion please stop now or be taken offline?
Thank you,
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 12:40 +0300, Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> And 1 more thing,
> Cannonical is Ubuntu
> Novel is Suse
> RedHat is NOT Fedora
>
>
> Bogo
I was wondering if you could back up slogans like that with something
substantial. Wit
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 12:02 +0300, Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stefan Held wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 11:41 +0300 schrieb Bogomil
"Bogo" Shopov:
> >
> >> Because Fedo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And 1 more thing,
Cannonical is Ubuntu
Novel is Suse
RedHat is NOT Fedora
Bogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGZS+BvnZHkQPM91ARAqrtAJ9KoT3k13F3FC3L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Held wrote:
Hi ,
> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 12:02 +0300 schrieb Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov:
>
>> Action, my friend actions.
>
> ?
>
>> Suse (not OpenSuse) ans Ubuntu depends a lot of theirs company sponsors, but
>> NOT Fedora.
>
> Have you
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 12:02 +0300 schrieb Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov:
> Action, my friend actions.
?
> Suse (not OpenSuse) ans Ubuntu depends a lot of theirs company sponsors, but
> NOT Fedora.
Have you ever seen the amount of money RH spends to run Fedora? Would
you like to take care of th
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 12:02 +0300, Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stefan Held wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 11:41 +0300 schrieb Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov:
> >
> >> Because Fedora is community driven distro. Ubuntu and suse are NOT
> >> com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Held wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 11:41 +0300 schrieb Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov:
>
>> Because Fedora is community driven distro. Ubuntu and suse are NOT
>> community driven
>
> LOL.
Action, my friend actions. Suse (not OpenSuse) ans Ubunt
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
> Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit :
> Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL
> and Fedora
This is why i said we maybe have to discuss this again.
Trust me, i have recent and respectfull s
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 11:41 +0300 schrieb Bogomil "Bogo" Shopov:
> Because Fedora is community driven distro. Ubuntu and suse are NOT
> community driven
LOL.
Please. Stop doing that.
> Bogo
http://en.opensuse.org/Project_overview
The openSUSE project is a community program sponsored b
Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit :
>
> Why is this such a bad thing for anybody?
Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL
and Fedora
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Held wrote:
> Am Montag, den 04.06.2007, 13:10 -0700 schrieb Thomas Chung:
>
>> As an Ambassador, please refer to "Do not wear a big red hat" in our
>> Fedora Ambassador Conduct page[1].
>>
>> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Condu
Am Montag, den 04.06.2007, 13:10 -0700 schrieb Thomas Chung:
> As an Ambassador, please refer to "Do not wear a big red hat" in our
> Fedora Ambassador Conduct page[1].
>
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Conduct
I think this has to be discussed again. RedHat Employees can not wear
Hi,
you could ask Gerold Kassube, he has a bunch of unsold Fedora caps from
Linuxtag. Inner-european shipping is much cheaper.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GeroldKassube
cu romal
Jonathan Roberts schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I have no idea if this is the best list to send this question to, but
> y
On 6/4/07, Gian Paolo Mureddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram escribió:
> Yep. Shipping costs are bit insane. We have been looking for
> alternatives.
>
> Rahul
>
I wonder how much would it be for shipping down to Mexico... I'll
prolly in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram escribió:
> Yep. Shipping costs are bit insane. We have been looking for
> alternatives.
>
> Rahul
>
I wonder how much would it be for shipping down to Mexico... I'll
prolly investigate later, I'd be most interested in the "batch" gear
Hey all,
Thomas Chung wrote:
On 6/4/07, Dimitris Glezos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we have an update on that?
If not, maybe it's something the European team could (would want to)
tackle?
-d
Hi Dimitris,
We do have an *unofficial* site where Fedora Ambassadors can order
T-shrits and Caps
On 6/4/07, Dimitris Glezos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we have an update on that?
If not, maybe it's something the European team could (would want to) tackle?
-d
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED], GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
Hi Dimitris,
We do have an *unoff
Thomas Chung wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Benjamin Lewis wrote:
>> > I don't know if I am correct or not, but I have always been under the
>> > impression Red Hat don't want us to associate hats with Fedora (in
>>
Dimitris Glezos wrote:
O/H Rahul Sundaram έγραψε:
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Thanks Thomas and Rahul!
Shucks though...$50 when shipped to the UK - a little bit too much for
me to spend on a hat :(
I'll kick back and dream!
Yep. Shipping costs are bit insane. We have been looking for alternativ
Do we have an update on that?
If not, maybe it's something the European team could (would want to) tackle?
There are bound to be companies all around the world that do custom
printing to order aren't there? goodstorm style...
Jon
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@red
O/H Rahul Sundaram έγραψε:
> Jonathan Roberts wrote:
>> Thanks Thomas and Rahul!
>>
>> Shucks though...$50 when shipped to the UK - a little bit too much for
>> me to spend on a hat :(
>>
>> I'll kick back and dream!
>>
>
> Yep. Shipping costs are bit insane. We have been looking for alternatives.
On 6/4/07, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> I don't know if I am correct or not, but I have always been under the
> impression Red Hat don't want us to associate hats with Fedora (in spite
> of the name)
This is a hat with a logo stamped
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Thanks Thomas and Rahul!
Shucks though...$50 when shipped to the UK - a little bit too much for
me to spend on a hat :(
I'll kick back and dream!
Yep. Shipping costs are bit insane. We have been looking for alternatives.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
F
Thanks Thomas and Rahul!
Shucks though...$50 when shipped to the UK - a little bit too much for
me to spend on a hat :(
I'll kick back and dream!
Jon
On 04/06/07, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have no idea if this is the best list to send th
Benjamin Lewis wrote:
I don't know if I am correct or not, but I have always been under the
impression Red Hat don't want us to associate hats with Fedora (in spite
of the name)
This is a hat with a logo stamped on it. Not a blue hat or anything.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list ma
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Hi all,
I have no idea if this is the best list to send this question to, but
you'll point me elsewhere if not right!?
I just watched the F7 promo...the baseball hat with the Fedora logo on
looked awesome! Where/how can I get one?! Fedora clothing would be
cool, with suc
I don't know if I am correct or not, but I have always been under the
impression Red Hat don't want us to associate hats with Fedora (in spite
of the name)
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have no idea if this is the best list to send this question to, but
> you&#x
On 6/4/07, Jonathan Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have no idea if this is the best list to send this question to, but
you'll point me elsewhere if not right!?
I just watched the F7 promo...the baseball hat with the Fedora logo on
looked awesome! Where/how can I get one?! Fedora c
Hi all,
I have no idea if this is the best list to send this question to, but
you'll point me elsewhere if not right!?
I just watched the F7 promo...the baseball hat with the Fedora logo on
looked awesome! Where/how can I get one?! Fedora clothing would be
cool, with such an amazing logo :D
I k
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Paul Stauffer sent out 0.6K bytes to say:
> I assume you are referring to fedoraforum.org, which has no affiliation with
> the Fedora Project, and is free to use whatever graphics they feel they can
> legally get away with.
I don't think that is _stricly_ true.
http://forums.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:38:25PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also: Did someone say; "No hats!"? There is a blue hat in the header of
> the forum page.
I assume you are referring to fedoraforum.org, which has no affiliation with
the Fedora Project, and is free to use whatev
43 matches
Mail list logo
